Thumbcocker
05-05-2015, 08:58 PM
Shot a new model flat top .44 special the other day and noticed lead in the forcing cone. Got to thinking; seems like most of my Ruger single actions have a little lead in the forcing cone after a trip to the range. Exceptions being .44's with full snort h110 loads.
Pulled 4 Rugers out of the safe. One limited run 2000 accusport Bisley 2 new flat top .44 specials and an older Red Hawk. Procedure was run oily patch down bore, oil a .457 pure lead ball and tap through bore. All three SA's had the ball stop dead right at the thread area. The new .44 Specials were the worst the accusport has been shot a lot more and still had detectable resistance. Red Hawk had almost no resistance. To check my technique I slugged an Uberti 1858 cap and ball. No detectable constriction.
All 3 single actions have shot well. The accuspot is VERY accurate as is one of the specials. All will have some amount of lead at the forcing cone unless soot fulls of slow powder are used. Not especially hard to get out but annoying. All loads are with boolits of acww sized .431 and libed with lithibee.
Am I expecting too much of is just the way of the Ruger?
Pulled 4 Rugers out of the safe. One limited run 2000 accusport Bisley 2 new flat top .44 specials and an older Red Hawk. Procedure was run oily patch down bore, oil a .457 pure lead ball and tap through bore. All three SA's had the ball stop dead right at the thread area. The new .44 Specials were the worst the accusport has been shot a lot more and still had detectable resistance. Red Hawk had almost no resistance. To check my technique I slugged an Uberti 1858 cap and ball. No detectable constriction.
All 3 single actions have shot well. The accuspot is VERY accurate as is one of the specials. All will have some amount of lead at the forcing cone unless soot fulls of slow powder are used. Not especially hard to get out but annoying. All loads are with boolits of acww sized .431 and libed with lithibee.
Am I expecting too much of is just the way of the Ruger?