My new to me m-92

[GunnyJohn]

O.K. here we go. Pictures hopefully...

135832135833135834135835

So any way, as to the feed problems I mentioned in my earlier post. I gave the ol girl a quick cleaning and a little oil and found out that if I cycle her quickly and deliberately she seems to feed o.k. Now I just need the wife to wake up so I can step out the front door to the test fire range. I'll let you know how it goes.

[HiVelocity]

Test fire it out the back door, she'll wake up......... lol!

Gunny, most of the 92's, IMHO, have to be levered with authority, if you know what I mean. Now, you have to find a mold to feed your 92. I bought the RD 360-190 for mine. Good Luck with your new 92'.

HV

[rondog]

Nice! I'm currently lusting for a 24" '92 in .45 Colt. But why does the caliber stamping look funny in the first photo? Almost looks restamped?

[VA Jim]

My guess is, it's a 32 wcf rebored and chambered to .357 mag. I've got a 92 in 38 wcf which is a fun one to shoot. I've got the hankering for a repro 92 in 357 or 45. Maybe both:bigsmyl2:

[VA Jim]

My guess is, it's a 32 wcf rebored and chambered to .357 mag. I've got a 92 in 38 wcf which is a fun one to shoot. I've got the hankering for a repro 92 in 357 or 45. Maybe both:bigsmyl2:. Gunny, yours look to be in really good shape. If I found one like it I'd probably have to have it.

[nvbirdman]

Since the 92's were never made in 357 mag. it would have to be either restamped or rebarreled.

[GunnyJohn]

VA Jim you're right it was a 32-20 rebored to a 357 mag, which is fine with me. It is in nice shape made in 1910 according to the ser#.

[JHeath]

No, it is THE original .357 WCF prototype, long-sought proof that Keith and Wesson stole the cartridge design from John Browning.

[TXGunNut]

Oops, guess I was a little late with my clean & lube advice. Congrats on a nice little shooter!