milrifle
07-21-2014, 07:46 AM
I was going to try to work up a load in my No. 4 Mk 1 with my new NOE 316299 and IMR 4198. I first did a ladder test and found 25.0, 25.5, 26.0, 26.5, and 27.0 gr loads all 'noded' very close together. So, I loaded up 10 rounds at 26.0. Seven of them went into a nice little group not much larger than 1". One was about 1-1/2" to the right of this group and I may well have pulled that shot. However, two of them, were 2-1/2" higher than the group and maybe 2" apart from each other. I KNOW I didn't do that!
I read up on "Lube purge flyers", but I'm not sure that's what was happening. I was using a fairly soft home made lube called Simple Green or Simple Lube from a recipe I found on this sight. It was rather warm yesterday. In the 90's. Maybe, but I'm not sure.
Another theory is that I had two rounds that were a tad harder to chamber than the others. The bullets are sized .314 and are seated out where the first driving band is just being engraved by the start of the lands in the throat. But like I said, on two rounds, I could feel the camming action of the bolt seemed like it was meeting a slight resistance as I closed it. I'm wondering if those two rounds may have had too much land engagement and allowed higher pressure to build, resulting in higher velocity and higher point of impact. Hindsight is 20/20. I wish that I had been taking notes and shooting over the chrony, and looking at each round rather than just going downrange after firing the 10, but I didn't. I'm definitely going to pursue this load some more, though, as I was very pleased with the grouping of the 7 rounds. Especially given it is just a beat up old milsurp with iron sights. Factory ammo sure don't group like that in this rifle.
So, do you guys think my theory is valid, or do you think something else is going on?
I read up on "Lube purge flyers", but I'm not sure that's what was happening. I was using a fairly soft home made lube called Simple Green or Simple Lube from a recipe I found on this sight. It was rather warm yesterday. In the 90's. Maybe, but I'm not sure.
Another theory is that I had two rounds that were a tad harder to chamber than the others. The bullets are sized .314 and are seated out where the first driving band is just being engraved by the start of the lands in the throat. But like I said, on two rounds, I could feel the camming action of the bolt seemed like it was meeting a slight resistance as I closed it. I'm wondering if those two rounds may have had too much land engagement and allowed higher pressure to build, resulting in higher velocity and higher point of impact. Hindsight is 20/20. I wish that I had been taking notes and shooting over the chrony, and looking at each round rather than just going downrange after firing the 10, but I didn't. I'm definitely going to pursue this load some more, though, as I was very pleased with the grouping of the 7 rounds. Especially given it is just a beat up old milsurp with iron sights. Factory ammo sure don't group like that in this rifle.
So, do you guys think my theory is valid, or do you think something else is going on?