Harry O
02-02-2014, 09:23 PM
I have read here the three ways that lube gets from the lube groove to the barrel. It seemed to me that the major factor was the acceleration of the bullet and the viscosity (hardness) of the lube. When the bullet is fired, the lube (due to inertia) moves back and when it hits the back of the lube groove it has no way to go but outward into the barrel. The higher the acceleration, the harder (more viscous) the lube must be. The lower the acceleration, the lube can be less hard.
I use SPG lube for my black powder guns and low-speed smokeless-powder guns (like CAS loads). It has low viscosity and works well. I use NRA 50/50 lube on my higher-velocity pistol and lower-velocity rifle bullets. It works well with .357 Magnum, .30 Carbine, 30-40 Krag and the like. I have never been totally happy with it when it came to medium velocity loads, like the .38 Special, 45LC, 38-40 and the like. So I finally decided to try something. BTW, I have NEVER been happy with the hard "crayon" lube that comes on some of the bullets I have bought.
I took some old, some partial sticks, and already melted pan-lube 50/50 lube, melted it together and added a little mineral oil to reduce the viscosity. I didn't want to go too far, so it took a couple of meltings and adding a little bit more oil until I had something that was between the SPF and 50/50 hadness. I put them on the exact same bullets (358477), sized to the exact same size (0.358"), used the same type and amount of powder (6.2gr of HS-6), loaded in the same brand cases (Federal), with the same primers (Winchester). I shot five 15-shot groups with my K-38 from a rest, like I have done in the past.
The groups sizes were noticeably better than with straight 50/50 lube. Group sizes were 1/4 to 1/3 less than with straight 50/50 lube and were remarkably consistent. Interestingly, I saw something that I had never seen before. The front of the barrel had twice as many star-lube arms as I am used to seeing. All arms were very narrow. All were in the groove, but on each side and very close to the land of the barrel. There was absolutely no leading.
I am going to experiment with some other medium velocity loads. I also want to try this lube on the .357 Magnum. I think in that one it will be no better and might be worse than straight 50/50 lube. We will see, but I am definitely interested in pursuing this. BTW, I have tried some calculations on acceleration without success. Knowing the velocity at the muzzle and the barrel length, it is possible to calculate a constant acceleration. However, from everything I have read, this is not the way gunpowder accelerates the bullet. I also don't have any way to calculate the viscosity, but I can probably rig something up for comparison purposes so I can duplicate what works.
Has anybody else done anything similar to this?
I use SPG lube for my black powder guns and low-speed smokeless-powder guns (like CAS loads). It has low viscosity and works well. I use NRA 50/50 lube on my higher-velocity pistol and lower-velocity rifle bullets. It works well with .357 Magnum, .30 Carbine, 30-40 Krag and the like. I have never been totally happy with it when it came to medium velocity loads, like the .38 Special, 45LC, 38-40 and the like. So I finally decided to try something. BTW, I have NEVER been happy with the hard "crayon" lube that comes on some of the bullets I have bought.
I took some old, some partial sticks, and already melted pan-lube 50/50 lube, melted it together and added a little mineral oil to reduce the viscosity. I didn't want to go too far, so it took a couple of meltings and adding a little bit more oil until I had something that was between the SPF and 50/50 hadness. I put them on the exact same bullets (358477), sized to the exact same size (0.358"), used the same type and amount of powder (6.2gr of HS-6), loaded in the same brand cases (Federal), with the same primers (Winchester). I shot five 15-shot groups with my K-38 from a rest, like I have done in the past.
The groups sizes were noticeably better than with straight 50/50 lube. Group sizes were 1/4 to 1/3 less than with straight 50/50 lube and were remarkably consistent. Interestingly, I saw something that I had never seen before. The front of the barrel had twice as many star-lube arms as I am used to seeing. All arms were very narrow. All were in the groove, but on each side and very close to the land of the barrel. There was absolutely no leading.
I am going to experiment with some other medium velocity loads. I also want to try this lube on the .357 Magnum. I think in that one it will be no better and might be worse than straight 50/50 lube. We will see, but I am definitely interested in pursuing this. BTW, I have tried some calculations on acceleration without success. Knowing the velocity at the muzzle and the barrel length, it is possible to calculate a constant acceleration. However, from everything I have read, this is not the way gunpowder accelerates the bullet. I also don't have any way to calculate the viscosity, but I can probably rig something up for comparison purposes so I can duplicate what works.
Has anybody else done anything similar to this?