PDA

View Full Version : 300 BLK AR Optimized Subsonic Boolit



Dr.Phil
01-07-2014, 01:57 PM
I got into casting my own boolits a few years ago specifically for use with Subsonic 300 BLK.
This forum was a priceless resource for helping me get up and running and enabled me to purchase my first NOE 247 FN WHISPER mould.
Most importantly, I had all the information required to safely make these boolits.

The issue that I have come across is reliable feeding in an AR platform.
I started a thread over at 300 BLK Talk trying to get the 247 NOE Boolit to feed reliably.
http://www.300blktalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=141&t=83966

This thread is not intended to continue the discussion regarding function of the 247 Grain NOE in the AR platform.
It is intended to discuss the feasibility of casting boolits with a long unsupported secant nose.
Several bullet manufactures have developed projectiles with a profile that is optimized so they will feed reliably in a 300 BLK AR.

Here are several examples:
125 Grain SMK:
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/AAC_SMK.jpg
110 Grain Barnes TAC-TX:
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/Barnes_TAC-TX_Small.jpg
Lehigh Defense 194 Maximum Expansion:
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/Lehigh-Defense_194ME.jpg
Lehigh Defense 110 Controlled Chaos:
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/Lehigh-Defense_110CC.jpg
Remington UMC 220 Subsonic:
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/Rem-UMC_220-OTM-SUB.jpg

AAC / Robert Silvers realized early on that for the 300 BLK to perform at the same reliability level in an AR platform as 5.56 NATO, it needed to use projectiles that had the optimal dimensions.
Optimal dimensions being:
- A projectile that was long enough to be magazine length when loaded.
- A projectile that contacted the magazine rib in a manner that mimics the shoulder of 5.56 NATO brass.
- A projectile that is able to withstand the harsh environment of the Direct Impingement Action and Feed Ramps of an AR.
- A projectile that is of the appropriate weight for either Super Sonic or Sub Sonic use.

This leads me to the point of this thread.
Why can't a cast projectile / boolit be utilized to achieve the same results.?

Using the online tool over at Mountain Molds, I designed this boolit:
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-245gr-SUB_MARK1.png
My intention was to design a boolit mould that would function the same as the Remington 220 OTM Subsonic.
It has the same nose length as the 247 Grain NOE (.875") and weighs in at 245 grains.

The Mountain Molds online application will not allow you to order this design since it violates the program's parameters regarding the Meplat.
I apologize if the question / idea I'm posing is "stupid", but if this design is working with solid and jacketed bullets, why wouldn't it work for cast boolits?

Jupiter7
01-07-2014, 02:36 PM
It'll work fine and does. Very similar to the designs member dolomite supafly has done. I own the 31-240E.

http://accuratemolds.com/bullet_detail.php?bullet=31-225B-D.png

This is a cut down version for supersonic
http://accuratemolds.com/bullet_detail.php?bullet=31-180W-D.png

Dr.Phil
01-07-2014, 03:23 PM
Thanks for the info.
I run into DS all the time over at 300 BLK Talk.
His boolit designs are pretty cool.
I know that he was hoping to get a smaller point on the 31-225B-D than what he ended up with.
If I remember correctly, he was limited by the size of the point that Accurate Molds could produce.

If you look at our two designs side by side, I think that my design might feed better.
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/31-225B_Small.pnghttp://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-245gr-SUB_MARK1.png

The primary goal for me is to get as close to 100% subsonic reliability from a cast boolit in the AR Platform as possible.
If there is already a mould out there that does that, even better!

popper
01-07-2014, 04:24 PM
DrPhil - I spent about a month working on my mags to get 150 gr. SPP factory to run in my 308 AR. I found the long pointy nose would get bent (jacketed already)! Actually, even the RD 180 gr. was not reliable. The nose runs into the flat below the M4 ramps. The BCG would move the case til the boolit got shoved back into the case (it would NOT feed). Short story, your meplat must be above the bottom of the feed ramps. Even then a long nosed weak alloy may bend. If you want to PC, get rid of the crimp & lube grooves, cut the non-sized nose down to ~0.298. That will add ~ 8 gr. I use a 31-165B that is very reliable. Loading to full mag length is only needed to get the weight up.

Dr.Phil
01-07-2014, 04:58 PM
Thanks for the input!
Good to know about the Meplat having to be above the bottom of the feed ramps.

As far as not having to be at mag length, I've had problems in the past when 300 BLK loads aren't loaded long.
Even if the bullet is making perfect contact with the magazine ribs, it doesn't take much to get the cartridges to move forward.
That almost always results in a mess in the magazine that results in a stoppage.

My thoughts are to take the dimensions of the 5.56 NATO cartridge and create a 300 BLK specific boolit that matches them as closely as possible.
- From the case mouth, the boolit length would be .882"
- Width of the boolit where it contacts the magazine rib would be .25"
- The boolit would contact the magazine rib .161" out from the case mouth

PalmettoShooter
01-07-2014, 06:53 PM
DrPhil - I spent about a month working on my mags to get 150 gr. SPP factory to run in my 308 AR. I found the long pointy nose would get bent (jacketed already)! Actually, even the RD 180 gr. was not reliable. The nose runs into the flat below the M4 ramps. The BCG would move the case til the boolit got shoved back into the case (it would NOT feed). Short story, your meplat must be above the bottom of the feed ramps. Even then a long nosed weak alloy may bend. If you want to PC, get rid of the crimp & lube grooves, cut the non-sized nose down to ~0.298. That will add ~ 8 gr. I use a 31-165B that is very reliable. Loading to full mag length is only needed to get the weight up.

+1 You're dead on about the meplat. That's a headache and a half for a lot of people and you never think about it until AFTER you get the mold. AR's feed ramps are funny with loading. And Dr.Phil, you'll have a good 300blk subsonic soon enough... The samples of my 200gr projectile are still on sched to go out mid-January.

Joel O.
Palmetto Projectiles

wlc
01-07-2014, 09:07 PM
This is partially off topic, my apologies. With the M-4 feed ramps used in AR's being designed basically for the 5.56 round wouldn't it be beneficial to open them up in some way to accommodate the larger 30 cal bullets/boolits we want to shoot in the 300 blk?

Dr Phil, I like your design. Personally I would want it a bit lighter @+- 220-225 gr but that is just me. I think a lot of it will have to do with finding a mold maker that can accommodate making a "pointy" boolit mold or at least one with a smaller meplat.

Frozone
01-07-2014, 10:48 PM
With the M-4 feed ramps used in AR's being designed basically for the 5.56 round wouldn't it be beneficial to open them up in some way to accommodate the larger 30 cal bullets/boolits we want to shoot in the 300 blk?

I open the ramps in My 300 blks. You don't need to for jacketed, but I have had jams from the sides of the ramps cutting into a cast boolit before I recontoured and polished them.

wlc
01-08-2014, 12:40 AM
I open the ramps in My 300 blks. You don't need to for jacketed, but I have had jams from the sides of the ramps cutting into a cast boolit before I recontoured and polished them.

Dremel operation or by hand?? I've never done it so school me a bit.

Frozone
01-08-2014, 01:07 AM
I used a dremel, but I use them a lot. If you aren't careful, you can do alot of damage in a hurry with one.
I used the small fine chain saw sharpener stone for the rough cut then eased it into smooth with a cylinder shaped cratex.

If you're nervous about the dremel ( and most should be) wrap a nail in emery for a similar effect.

wlc
01-08-2014, 01:51 AM
I hate to keep hi-jacking Dr Phils thread, I'll PM you tomorrow with a couple more questions.

Sorry for the hi-jack. Back to your regularly scheduled forum thread.

Dr.Phil
01-08-2014, 08:30 AM
+1 You're dead on about the meplat. That's a headache and a half for a lot of people and you never think about it until AFTER you get the mold. AR's feed ramps are funny with loading. And Dr.Phil, you'll have a good 300blk subsonic soon enough... The samples of my 200gr projectile are still on sched to go out mid-January.

Joel O.
Palmetto Projectiles
Thanks again for the samples Joel!
I can't wait to test them out.
Hopefully they are just what I'm looking for.

I feel fortunate that I was able to get on the list to receive your samples.
The anticipation is killing me...
I know that you are keeping the design under your hat, but seeing how close it comes to meeting "optimal 300 BLK" criteria will be very interesting!


I hate to keep hi-jacking Dr Phils thread, I'll PM you tomorrow with a couple more questions.

Sorry for the hi-jack. Back to your regularly scheduled forum thread.
No worries...
I have not cut on my feed ramps / barrel extension.
My goal is to try and avoid that if at all possible.
It is nice to hear all the techniques for doing so though.

Dr.Phil
01-08-2014, 10:02 AM
This is partially off topic, my apologies. With the M-4 feed ramps used in AR's being designed basically for the 5.56 round wouldn't it be beneficial to open them up in some way to accommodate the larger 30 cal bullets/boolits we want to shoot in the 300 blk?

Dr Phil, I like your design. Personally I would want it a bit lighter @+- 220-225 gr but that is just me. I think a lot of it will have to do with finding a mold maker that can accommodate making a "pointy" boolit mold or at least one with a smaller meplat.
I agree on the weight, but going heavier allows it to mimic the jacketed bullet performance better.
Additionally, the heavier boolit allows one to use the Forster Hollow Pointing jig to make hunting boolits that are still around the 200 grain mark.

wlc
01-08-2014, 09:46 PM
I agree on the weight, but going heavier allows it to mimic the jacketed bullet performance better.
Additionally, the heavier boolit allows one to use the Forster Hollow Pointing jig to make hunting boolits that are still around the 200 grain mark.

Bolded above: How so? Not trying to be a smart butt, but really would like to learn. My one question is would the additional length of the 250 gr boolit require the use of the 1:7 twist barrels where 220-225 still reliably stabilize in a 1:8? Or is that more an issue in jacketed rounds?

Dr.Phil
01-09-2014, 09:09 AM
The twist rate required to stabilize a bullet is primarily dependent on the length of the bullet at a given velocity.
A cast boolit is more dense than a jacketed bullet and therefore will be shorter for the given weight.
245 - 250 grains is pretty much the cut off for a cast bullet running subsonic velocities in a 1:8 twist barrel.
220 grains is generally considered the cut off weight for a jacketed bullet.

So, with that said, a heavier cast boolit will be longer than a lighter jacketed bullet, but the heavier boolit will be similar in length.
This is what I meant when I made that statement.

Another example using different metals would be comparing solid copper bullets to jacketed ones.
The solids are much lighter than their FMJ counterparts due to this density difference.
And for one final example, the M4 Carbine called for a 1:7 twist barrel.
That was not done to accommodate the new 77 grain OTM projectiles.
It was done to accommodate the 63 grain M856 tracer rounds that accompanied the 62 grain M855.
They are extraordinarily long for their weight and require the 1:7 twist rate.

wlc
01-09-2014, 05:29 PM
Thank you. Makes sense to me now.

Dr.Phil
01-13-2014, 11:24 AM
Here is the latest versions of my "Dream Moulds" for 300 BLK.

Here are the subsonic and super sonic boolits that I would like to get moulds for.
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-230gr-SUB_MARK2.png
230 Grain Subsonic

http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-175gr-SUPER_MARK1.png
175 Grain Supersonic
(If these were powder coated, could them be run without a GC?)

Now if I could only find a manufacture that would be able to make them I'd be all set.
Apparently the big road block for Accurate or Mountain Moulds is Meplat size.
For right now, I think the closest that I can get to my goal is to hope that Joel @ Palmetto Projectiles comes up with the "Magic Boolit". ;)

gds
01-13-2014, 12:36 PM
Dr phil. I think you are on the right track. While my NOE boolits have fed fine in my ARs. I have really wanted a boolit like you describe. Especially one that once powder coated, i would not need to change the seeting depth so much like i have had to do with the NOE. Also like the idea of being able to hollow point it with the forster jig. Which is what i do with the NOE. Or maybe order it as a hollow point mold.

Dr.Phil
01-14-2014, 09:12 AM
While getting this mould made would be awesome, the normal sources for one off moulds are not able to produce one with such a small Meplat.
I have not contacted Sweede @ NOE yet, but if he is able to make a mould similar to my specification, I wonder if there would be enough interest to start a group buy?
With casting for the 300 BLK being as popular as it is, and looking at the popularity of the NOE 247 FN mould, I suspect that there might be enough demand to warrant a group buy.

What say you?
If the interest is there, I will contact NOE and start a Group Buy thread. (If he can make this shape.)
I would focus on the 230 grain subsonic boolit first then look at the 175 supersonic.

Artful
01-14-2014, 09:25 AM
Wonder if it would be possible to have someone create your design down to where their equipment couldn't make the nose any
smaller then create a end mill with the correct contours to continue in a plunge cut to get the last bit out of the cavity?

Jupiter7
01-14-2014, 09:44 AM
It'd be nice to get both cut in the same mold.

Dr.Phil
01-14-2014, 09:55 AM
It'd be nice to get both cut in the same mold.
Since they are both the same shape, I would think that would be possible.
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-230gr-SUB_MARK2.pnghttp://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-175gr-SUPER_MARK1.png
"Artful's" idea of using an endmill to finish up the profile on the mould sounds feasible, but that is out of my lane.

One of the added benefits of the subsonic design is that it will tumble much easier on impact than the 247 NOE FN.
My biggest concern is whether or not the nose would get damaged by the feed ramps while loading.

Greg5278
01-14-2014, 09:58 AM
I would check and see if a Machine Shop with a Ram type EDM machine could help you. maybe get the Mold with a slightly shorter nose that Accurate or MM can produce. The EDM then can make the final Profile Changes. It sort of Dissolves the Metal with an Electric Discharge and water as the conductive Fluid. The nice thing is it will cut any conductive material regardless of Hardness. Carbide no problem, Titanium the same.
Good Luck
Greg

wlc
01-14-2014, 04:04 PM
Dr Phil if you go forward with this I'd definitely be interested.

Artful
01-14-2014, 06:24 PM
Another dumb thought - what if you order it as a hollowpoint and insert a nylon tip into it to get the shape you want?

wlc
01-14-2014, 09:24 PM
Dumb question..... I assume you mean nylon tip as in similar to the tips in a Nosler ballistic tip? Where would one get a supply of these???? Interesting concept. Bet it would help negate nose damage in an AR. I like it.

Artful
01-14-2014, 09:43 PM
There are several threads here by guys who use the ballistic tips on cast and swaged - I'd have to ask them some pointed questions as this tip would have to be a specific shape to get what he wants.

kawasakifreak77
01-14-2014, 09:47 PM
A place called cutting edge makes jwords you can put plastic tips in. They sell extra tips on Midway.com

It would increase the b.c. & maybe it's likelyhood to tumble in flesh?

wlc
01-14-2014, 10:55 PM
Or possibly, if the alloy was soft enough cause some degree of mushrooming......????? This has really piqued my interest. Like I need another "project" on my plate.

StratsMan
01-14-2014, 11:08 PM
I'm no boolit engineer, but I have noticed a pattern in accurate cast boolits: high percentage boolit to barrel contact = best accuracy... That's the length of contact (driving bands + bore ride) / total boolit length... The design shown above as SuperSonic is a very low percentage contact area... looks like 40%, maybe less... Short contact boolit designs like 311414 were notorious for their lack of accuracy and are no longer favored.

On the other hand, high percentage contact boolits like the Loverin (sp?) designs have great reputations for accuracy, though they aren't nearly as pretty... Lead boolits just don't behave like a jacketed bullet, and long skinny points are much more likely to deform during acceleration and set up a wobble in the boolit (as I understand it)..

Personally, I shoot the Accurate 31-235B in my 300AAC because I like the longer ogive better than a shorter design. I've never had a feeding problem in my CMMG barrel. I haven't compared the feed ramps to other 300AAC rifles; it just works, and I think the barrel/ramp has as much (or more) to do with that success than the boolit design.

Artful
01-14-2014, 11:16 PM
Ah, midway
http://www.midwayusa.com/find?sortby=1&itemsperpage=24&newcategorydimensionid=20614

I know the NOE makes pointy boolit molds
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i80/swedenelson/NOE_Bullet_Moulds_301_212Gr_PP.jpg
and
JTknives aka HM˛ has made some sharp round nose
http://www.jtcustomknives.com/calendar/files/1/boolits/312_155_2.jpg

I don't know about
Mp Molds / Mihec molds

Sweetpea
01-14-2014, 11:19 PM
Is this what you're looking for?

http://noebulletmolds.com/NV/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=207

leadman
01-15-2014, 03:19 AM
The Lee design 230-5R-TL is similar in shape to what Dr Phil is posting but with a boat-tail. I tried many approaches to get this to shoot in my 300 Whisper Contender including putting a gas check on the boat tail. The boolit usually leaves oblong holes in the target. My Savage 110 30-06 did the best with these loaded to about 1,900 fps.
I did drill out the base of one of the cavities so am going to try this out hopefully tomorrow.
The most accurate heavy boolit in my 300 whisper is the Lyman 314299 sized to .310". Don't know how it feeds in an AR. I have given out many samples of these to AR owners and requested feedback but so far have not had any. Only been about 2 years now.

Dr.Phil
01-15-2014, 09:03 AM
Is this what you're looking for?

http://noebulletmolds.com/NV/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=207
That is the exact same mould (-the GC) that I currently own and can't get to feed properly.



Another dumb thought - what if you order it as a hollowpoint and insert a nylon tip into it to get the shape you want?
Adding polymer tips is a cool idea.
That is exactly what Barnes did with their wildly popular 110 grain TAC-TX "Black Tip" that was designed for the 300 BLK.
My concern with that is adding cost and the potential for the tips to no longer be available for individual purchase.
(One of the primary objectives is to get an inexpensive cast subsonic boolit that runs as reliably as a 300 BLK specific bullet.)



I'm no boolit engineer, but I have noticed a pattern in accurate cast boolits: high percentage boolit to barrel contact = best accuracy... That's the length of contact (driving bands + bore ride) / total boolit length... The design shown above as SuperSonic is a very low percentage contact area... looks like 40%, maybe less... Short contact boolit designs like 311414 were notorious for their lack of accuracy and are no longer favored.

On the other hand, high percentage contact boolits like the Loverin (sp?) designs have great reputations for accuracy, though they aren't nearly as pretty... Lead boolits just don't behave like a jacketed bullet, and long skinny points are much more likely to deform during acceleration and set up a wobble in the boolit (as I understand it)..

Personally, I shoot the Accurate 31-235B in my 300AAC because I like the longer ogive better than a shorter design. I've never had a feeding problem in my CMMG barrel. I haven't compared the feed ramps to other 300AAC rifles; it just works, and I think the barrel/ramp has as much (or more) to do with that success than the boolit design.
While I would prefer the most accurate boolit possible, I understand that this design would likely not be as stable,
but I would rather have the reliability of a better shape.
If the gun doesn't run reliably, the accuracy of that boolit doesn't matter.
Unfortunately, without actual test data, it is impossible to know what the performance might be.
If you look at the performance of the NOE 247 FN in this video, I would go so far as to say this boolit is too stable for my taste.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ag-dtVjHz4
Much like a fighter jet, I believe that a projectile that is operating just on the edge of stability will perform best terminally.

Artful
01-15-2014, 09:20 AM
Well - there is a thread on here about making your own tips with a hot glue gun.

Dr.Phil
01-15-2014, 10:07 AM
Well - there is a thread on here about making your own tips with a hot glue gun.
I'm going to find that hard to resist.
It will not likely be a practical solution, but I will have to tinker with it.
A mould for hot glue ballistic tips would be killer.

Hopefully I can find the thread you mentioned.
The curiosity is killing me...

wlc
01-17-2014, 05:51 PM
Since they are both the same shape, I would think that would be possible.
http://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-230gr-SUB_MARK2.pnghttp://l8ntactical.com/storage/forum_images/L8N_Boolit-175gr-SUPER_MARK1.png
"Artful's" idea of using an endmill to finish up the profile on the mould sounds feasible, but that is out of my lane.

One of the added benefits of the subsonic design is that it will tumble much easier on impact than the 247 NOE FN.
My biggest concern is whether or not the nose would get damaged by the feed ramps while loading.

I saw a video that "twang n bang" posted on his youtube channel where he shot the NOE 247 grainer into ballistic gel. That thing traveled through 30 some odd inches of gel without tumbling. I do think your design would tumble much better and IF it could be hollow pointed and/or have the nylon tip added you would get actual expansion and not have to rely on the tumbling. Alloy would have to be played with to balance out shootability with softness, but (I'm guessing here as I'm not any kind of eggspurt..:) ) I would think that with the slow velocities we shoot the BLK softer alloy wouldn't pose a huge problem.

As far as the custom mold.... I really hesitate to say this, but LEE could also do it. IIRC they are doing custom stuff again. Don't know what the turn around time would be. They wouldn't be my first choice in this but is one avenue to explore if other vendors can't/won't do it or aren't interested in a one of thing.

Frozone
01-17-2014, 06:13 PM
well for myself I'd rather see one larger lube groove on your design but it is yours so what ever floats your boat.

2 reason for feed problems with the NOE offerings.
I have both the 247 and the 165 grain molds. Neither feed well.

First is the fat ogive at the nose, it likes to hang up on feed ramps. That is is easily fixed with a little ramp re-profiling/polishing.

Second is the bore rider design itself. The sides of the boolit rub on the ribs in the magazine, and the darn thing is nose heavy to start with.
It is impossible to load more than ~10 into a 30 round mag and get the cartridges to pop up in time to catch the bolt.
Fixed that by getting a bunch of cheap plastic mags and taking the ribs out. I found that Tapco are easiest to mod.
However, that rather defeats the idea of the 300 blk.

So here is my idea: (You can't draw it with Mountain Mold's software however)

A semi boreride design out to where the rib in a standard GI mag would be, ~ 5mm. Then a rounded section (think reverse ogive or a lube groove with only the back wall) to get around that.
Then the taper to as sharp a point as practical.

Example: Look at the of the Lyman 311644, now imagine a taper from the 'wasp waist' to the nose.

I cut down a NOE 247gr to show what I have in mind. but I for some reason I can't upload a pix
ftp://206.174.53.227/Images/300blkWW.jpg

wlc
01-17-2014, 07:08 PM
Frozone, that's interesting. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "groove"/wasp waist is where the boolit meets the rib in the mag? I bet that would work well and feed as long as the nose doesn't hit the feed ramps.

Frozone
01-17-2014, 07:11 PM
.... the "groove"/wasp waist is where the boolit meets the rib in the mag?.....

Correct.

I need to pull the boolit and see what it weighs but I bet it's still around 220gr.

< edit I pulled that one - almost exactly 220gr /edit >


Depending on a few things, I think it will tumble easier than the original as well.
Or maybe break in 2. not sure.

yondering
01-17-2014, 11:53 PM
I cut down a NOE 247gr to show what I have in mind. but I for some reason I can't upload a pix
ftp://206.174.53.227/Images/300blkWW.jpg

I like it. I've thought about a stepped bullet like that too, but your pic has me wondering about a bullet with a large lube groove in that location (about .025" deep x .050" long?); the area directly in front of the mag rib could be bore diameter, with a more traditional cast bullet nose. It could be a bore-ride section between the case mouth and that lube groove.


Dr. Phil, good timing on this thread; I've been considering the same issues. In my case, I want a supersonic bullet of 130-150gr, since velocity with the 170-180 range is pretty low from short barrels. I designed this one on the Mountain Molds website the other day, with a long unsupported nose. Of course the nose diameter is limited to about .180" by MM, so the length is dictated by the .250" diameter at the mag rib (actually I did .260" on this one). This would be 150gr as cast, but I'd probably hollow point at least one cavity. It does keep the gas check in the case neck, and I made the lube groove small since I powder coat my bullets and don't need lube.
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c26/zthang43/Bang/molds/300-15020AR20mag-1.jpg

Overton-AR
01-21-2014, 08:01 PM
I am thinking about milling the top of a NOE 311365 (198 grain) mold
down by .250". This would be the top of the mold....aka....bottom of the
boolit. It would leave a single lube groove, crimp groove and 2 driving
bands. I don't know what the end result will weigh, but I am going to
grind down a couple bullets and weigh them to see what it would be.

I really....REALLY want pointed bullets. I cannot stand the flat meplat
on the front of all these designs. If NOE can make a spire point, why
can't everyone else???

Artful
01-21-2014, 09:09 PM
I really....REALLY want pointed bullets. I cannot stand the flat meplat
on the front of all these designs. If NOE can make a spire point, why can't everyone else???

Tooling - check out NOE's Equipment/Shop