Animal
11-26-2013, 03:57 PM
I'm new to this rifle and have recently only realized that it is much more accurate than I originally expected it to be. I purchased this rifle as an 'all purpose rifle' for hunting 4 legged critters, defending against 2 legged predators and good old fashioned fun.
It is the only rifle I own and thought that it would be a good platform for just about any niche that would require decent accuracy at 100yds or less. I took it out for the 4th time yesterday for accuracy testing and more honeymooning. I was quiet shocked when I managed a 2 in group at 50yds with iron sights. Maybe this is normal accuracy for the old wasr, but I didn't think this rifle mixed with my shooting experience could obtain a group this tight. I figured center-mass shots between 50-100 yrds would be considered decent; I was wrong. I've underestimated this rifle and my skill to shoot it accurately.
So now I have a problem. Although this is good news, I can't help but wonder if it would ever be necessary to purchase a quality bolt-action rifle. I had planned on getting a Remington 700 chambered in .308 at some point to fit the 100 yard accuracy niche (can't imagine I'd ever need anything for over 100yds, but it is always a bonus). Now that I know my trusty wasr has the potential to fit the bill...
1. Is it justifiable to purchase a bolt-action rifle?
2. Is it safe to say a good optic with good ammo will be just as effective at 100yds?
Each firearm/bow I own fits a nitche. My collection is geared toward survival (in white tail deer country, Georgia), defense against intruders, SHTF defense and personal protection from thugs on the street.
I came across this optic: http://www.atlanticfirearms.com/component/virtuemart/shipping-accessories/posp-4x24-400m-rangefinder-ak-detail.html?Itemid=0
I was totally against spending money on optics for this rifle because of its reputation as "not an accurate rifle", but now I'm wondering if it would be a worthwhile investment over spending big bucks on a Remy 700.
1. I like the fact that it is an optic designed and 'battle proven' for my rifle.
2. I don't want a bunch of TactiCOOL garbage on my baby, I want this rifle to remain in its WASR parameters... not all the Tapco pig make-up.
3. The optic does not interfere with the use of the iron sights.
4. Quick removal and installation
5. The price point seems very justifiable if accuracy is on point at 100yds.
Is anyone familiar with this sight system? and what are your thoughts on it for phasing out my bolt-action rifle niche?
It is the only rifle I own and thought that it would be a good platform for just about any niche that would require decent accuracy at 100yds or less. I took it out for the 4th time yesterday for accuracy testing and more honeymooning. I was quiet shocked when I managed a 2 in group at 50yds with iron sights. Maybe this is normal accuracy for the old wasr, but I didn't think this rifle mixed with my shooting experience could obtain a group this tight. I figured center-mass shots between 50-100 yrds would be considered decent; I was wrong. I've underestimated this rifle and my skill to shoot it accurately.
So now I have a problem. Although this is good news, I can't help but wonder if it would ever be necessary to purchase a quality bolt-action rifle. I had planned on getting a Remington 700 chambered in .308 at some point to fit the 100 yard accuracy niche (can't imagine I'd ever need anything for over 100yds, but it is always a bonus). Now that I know my trusty wasr has the potential to fit the bill...
1. Is it justifiable to purchase a bolt-action rifle?
2. Is it safe to say a good optic with good ammo will be just as effective at 100yds?
Each firearm/bow I own fits a nitche. My collection is geared toward survival (in white tail deer country, Georgia), defense against intruders, SHTF defense and personal protection from thugs on the street.
I came across this optic: http://www.atlanticfirearms.com/component/virtuemart/shipping-accessories/posp-4x24-400m-rangefinder-ak-detail.html?Itemid=0
I was totally against spending money on optics for this rifle because of its reputation as "not an accurate rifle", but now I'm wondering if it would be a worthwhile investment over spending big bucks on a Remy 700.
1. I like the fact that it is an optic designed and 'battle proven' for my rifle.
2. I don't want a bunch of TactiCOOL garbage on my baby, I want this rifle to remain in its WASR parameters... not all the Tapco pig make-up.
3. The optic does not interfere with the use of the iron sights.
4. Quick removal and installation
5. The price point seems very justifiable if accuracy is on point at 100yds.
Is anyone familiar with this sight system? and what are your thoughts on it for phasing out my bolt-action rifle niche?