PDA

View Full Version : Initial Success with 360640 and Unique for Variation on FBI Load



Low Budget Shooter
07-01-2013, 11:01 PM
CB Friends,

I've been messing with cast loads for .38 Special for only a few years, and am by no means an expert. But after learning alot from this web forum and other sources, this week I've had a bit of success. In case it can be of help to newbies or give a smile to some old salts, I thought I'd offer this post.

The gun I'm loading for is an old Model 10-5, originally a police gun, that has been back to S&W a few years ago for a new cylinder. I picked it up for a song a few years ago from a nice man who didn't appreciate its qualities. The barrel slugs at .356 and the cylinder throats at .3575.

The mold I'm using is 45 2.1's 360640 hollow point 4-cavity mold made recently by Miha. Once good and hot, the mold casts consistent hollow point bullets at an amazing rate. It casts at about .361" and 149 grains. Sized .3575 and all lubed up with Carnauba Red, the bullet weighs about 151 grains. I made an initial batch out of range scrap, then a batch out of 50:1 (the culls and sprues from an old project using 25:1 mixed half and half with pure lead).

75132

I'm loading with 5.5 grains Unique, which meters consistently through my Lee powder measure using the .71 cavity.

The expansion test consisted of shooting into a bucket full of wet expired church bulletins and sermon notes. (I meant to shoot through some denim, but forgot to take the old jeans out to the shooting spot. It's out in the country, so I almost shucked mine off for the test, but they weren't even my worst pair, so I thought the resulting hole would be hard to explain to our family laundry department and at work the next day.) The 50:1 bullet mushroomed very nicely and penetrated deeply into the wet paper.

75133

The accuracy test consisted of shooting with wrists supported from 12 yards (to be precise---supported on the next-to-top rung of a 6' ladder, cushioned by my shooting hat and an old t-shirt from the cleaning kit). I first tested two other homemade loads of mine, both to see a control group and to get used to the firing setup. These two six-shot groups were about 4" groups. The heavy bullet load was a little high and the light bullet load a bit low of the bullseye. I am no great shot, so I suppose the spread of these groups was about half due to the gun/load combination and half to shooter error.

When I shot the first round of the 360640 test load, I didn't see a hole appear on the paper. I thought, "Oh, drat! My bullets are so bad I've missed entirely!" Then I realized the hole was in the black! I called my sons over to witness my moment of triumph, so there are witnesses. The next two shots also went in the black (I was holding on the center of the bullseye). I should have stopped there, but things were going so well that I fired the rest of the cylinder rather more carelessly that I had been, and ruined the beautiful thing I had going. Still, the group was less than half the size of my other two loads, and right to point of aim. This little bit of shooting would be the worst day of your life for many of you, but it was a big improvement for me, my old gun, and my homemade ammo.

There was very little, almost nothing, in the barrel after firing about 30 rounds, all soft alloys and some very soft. As a matter of fact, the bore looked downright shiny. I looked closely with a bore light and couldn't see any lead deposits.

75134

That's my story of a little initial success with this new bullet, old powder, and old gun. I hope it contributes a little something to this board. And I hope to do some better shooting as I get in some more practice.

Thanks,

Jeff
Low Budget Shooter

Green Lizzard
07-01-2013, 11:37 PM
looks good to me, purdy boolits also

Larry Gibson
07-02-2013, 10:13 AM
Godd load. I also use 5.5 gr Unique under a 40-1 358158HP and it duplicates the ballistics and terminal performance of the FBI and Winchester 150 gr LSWCHP factory +P loads. I also have pressure tested my load and the factory loads and it's right the with them. I've shot lot's of them in my old 5" M15 service revolver. Well done.

Larry Gibson

fecmech
07-02-2013, 10:21 AM
You don't need IMO any of the fancy jacketed stuff in the .38 spl. Soft lead alloys over 5-5.5 unique are very accurate and as effective as the .38 spl gets.

jmort
07-02-2013, 10:39 AM
Love everything about your post. Dedicated Unique user and .38/.357 user. Now if I only had that mold. Those bullets are beautiful.

Ramjet-SS
07-04-2013, 10:29 PM
Jeff,

That looks good and the data seems spot on good work and nice write up. This makes me want to get my hands on that mold. Gotta try some of these in my 686.

Low Budget Shooter
07-05-2013, 03:39 PM
Thanks for the encouraging replies, fellers.

CPL Lou
07-08-2013, 08:43 PM
Love everything about your post. Dedicated Unique user and .38/.357 user. Now if I only had that mold. Those bullets are beautiful.

Miha has extras, PM him.

CPL Lou

StratsMan
07-08-2013, 09:13 PM
LBS,

That has become my go-to boolit for 38's and slow 357's... Tho I may change the alloy for faster 357's... Thanks for the mushroom pic, too... I was wondering how they would look...

TheCelt
07-08-2013, 09:18 PM
Excellent mold review, load report and shootin! A pleasurable read by any measure.....appreciate your work and reporting on it!

Low Budget Shooter
09-30-2013, 11:37 PM
UPDATE: Over the past month, I've read and read trying to find out if adding a little more Unique would still be a safe load. I saw 6.0 grains for a 146 grain bullet mentioned in enough old manuals that I decided 5.9 grains for this bullet would be okay. So I loaded up a few and tried them. Accuracy was even better, and there were no signs of unsafe pressure in the fired cases and primers. LBS

Larry Gibson
10-01-2013, 05:21 PM
That is probably on the ragged edge of "acceptable" +P psi's givien the 146 gr bullet.

Larry Gibson

Low Budget Shooter
10-01-2013, 07:36 PM
Larry, thanks for the comment. I know you've worked alot on this kind of load. Want me to send you some to test?

45 2.1
10-01-2013, 08:10 PM
Nice report.... I hope you enjoy that boolit a lot more.

Low Budget Shooter
10-02-2013, 01:20 PM
Larry, I modified my powder thrower to drop 5.7 grains instead of just 5.5 or 5.9. Thanks for the word of caution. LBS

rintinglen
10-02-2013, 10:56 PM
Reading about your experiences made me get off my duff and cast up a few hundred with my own Mihec 4 banger. I got a bit over 400 in an hour, had 'em silicone sprayed and sized in another 50 minutes, will TL tomorrow and load some up. Thanks for the inspiration.
I have 4 Mihec Cramer style Molds now, and I simply love them. They allow you to cast hollow points nearly as fast as you can conventional boolits and while a bit pricey, they are no more so than standard SAECO molds of equivalent capacity, and a heck of a lot less than the cost of buying another mold and having it converted.

Larry Gibson
10-03-2013, 11:05 AM
Larry, I modified my powder thrower to drop 5.7 grains instead of just 5.5 or 5.9. Thanks for the word of caution. LBS

No problem, the S&W M10 you have will stand up quite well. The PD I worked for had M15s and M10 snubbies and we shot a lot of factory Winchester +Ps through them w/o any problems (I did the firearms instruction and maintenance). I still have my PD 5" M15 as we were allowed to buy them when the PD switched to 4" M15s. It has had a lot of my own 358156HPs over 5.5 gr Unique through it over the last 40 years and is still going strong.

As to sending lead or alloy; I'd not want to embarrass you by sending a better alloy so testing would be the 1st order of business. If you'd send me 300 - 400 lbs of your alloy I should be able to get a good comparison and see if it's worth me sending you some:bigsmyl2:

Larry Gibson

35remington
10-03-2013, 06:48 PM
I'd second the notion to stay away from the near 6 grain load of Unique and call things to a halt at the 5.5 grain vicinity. While it is a K frame, those old wide land Smiths don't have quite the metallurgy of the newer ones. Plus P is enough; Plus P Plus is probably not for fifty year old or older revolvers. Six grains would be in the Plus P Plus category.

My own 4 inch Smith looks just like yours, but the half moon front sight is still unaltered.

35remington
10-03-2013, 06:57 PM
And BTW....pressure signs won't "show up" for 38......until they're way too high. Loads too heavy for even a modest amount of shooting in older .38's won't show pressure signs either.

Ask me about Lee's discontinued sharply pointed truncated cone heavy 166 SWC (Looks like the 105 Lee with a much longer cylindrical section) with its long, deeply seated bearing surface and 2400 powder sometime. One reason I know.

Bohica793
10-03-2013, 11:14 PM
Ask me about Lee's discontinued sharply pointed truncated cone heavy 166 SWC (Looks like the 105 Lee with a much longer cylindrical section) with its long, deeply seated bearing surface and 2400 powder sometime. One reason I know.

Tell me about your experience. I have this mold also and have been loading it with 12.0 grains of 2400 in 357 cases with fair success.

83414

I believe the one in the middle is the one you are referring to. The one on the left is a Lyman 358091 148 grain WC and the one on the right is the Lyman 358429 173 grain SWC.

Low Budget Shooter
10-04-2013, 12:22 AM
35r, you are undoubtedly right, and after my initial excitement I'm calming down and backing off of the Unique a little bit. Thanks for taking the time to share that info. LBS

Djones
10-04-2013, 05:14 AM
LBS,

Great job on the load and your write up!

Thanks for sharing.

novalty
10-04-2013, 06:29 AM
What are these 360640 bullets weighing in at for FN and HP versions?

dubber123
10-04-2013, 08:13 AM
The data for the 146 gr. load you mention was likely for a Speer jacketed bullet, correct? If so, and if the seat depth and bearing surface were similar, I would expect a lubed, lead boolit to produce a good bit less pressure. My first "good" gun was a 10-5, just like yours. In the first year or so of ownership, I fired 30,000+ rounds through it, almost all of which were undoubtedly in the +P or over range. I still have that gun, and it's still as good as when I got it. Keep it well lubed fore and aft of the cylinder pivot points, and it will outlast you.

Low Budget Shooter
10-04-2013, 10:41 AM
Novalty, I haven't cast any solids. My HPs are coming in at 150 grains plus or minus 1 grain.
dubber123, thanks for the info.
LBS

novalty
10-04-2013, 11:16 AM
Thanks for the info LBS. I thought from the GB that the HP's were supposed to cast around 140gr, but didn't see any weigh estimates for the solids. I'm on the hunt for an additional 38 cal mold, and the 360640 is on my radar.

35remington
10-05-2013, 01:54 PM
If these bullets are less the hollow point cavity weight, and they are, they equate to a heavier bullet's seating depth. At a minimum they probably approximate regular 158 SWC seating depth, and 6 grains Unique would be rather much with such a bullet even if hollow pointed and slightly lighter.

Bohica, yes, that one in the middle in your picture is the bullet. I went "down" in data, looking at my Lyman 45 (old I know but I started reloading a while back) and dropped the charge a bit over that recommended for a "somewhat" similar bullet years ago, forgetting about seating depth. 9.5 grains 2400 with that bullet in 38 was more than I should have been using, and it produced startling power yet still easy case ejection from my Smith model 10.

I knocked that off right quick after chronographing it. Noticeably over 1000 fps.

Bohica793
10-05-2013, 03:28 PM
I ran this bullet through the chrono yesterday. On top of 12.0 grains of 2400 in a 357 case it produced 1 inch groups and 1300 fps at 15 yards offhand.

35remington
10-06-2013, 04:12 PM
That makes my point. The deep seating gets a lot of velocity as 12 grains 2400 wouldn't get 1300 with a regular 158 SWC. Does the same thing, only more so, in the smaller 38 case.

Bohica793
10-06-2013, 05:52 PM
That makes my point. The deep seating gets a lot of velocity as 12 grains 2400 wouldn't get 1300 with a regular 158 SWC. Does the same thing, only more so, in the smaller 38 case.

I commonly run a Modern Bond 358-755 155 grain SWC behind 12 grains of 2400 in a 38 special case (too long for a 357 case even seating at the front edge of the driving band). It clocks at 1300fps with no pressures signs on the cases or primers. I also shoot the Lyman 358429 170 grain SWC in the same configuration but have not bothered to chronograph it yet.