44man
08-20-2007, 09:53 AM
I chronographed the annealed checks against the hard checks in my 45-70 BFR and found some real strange stuff. I used the same load for all. My first was with dacron filler over 31 gr's of 4759 and a LP mag primer. It was real bad as far as the chrono goes;
SD 56.9, MAD 37.7, ES 138.1, AVE 1229.4 fps
I had three that had real bad runout and I didn't catch it right off. I didn't flare enough to start the boolit. I marked them just to shoot away. I fixed the other cases. BUT, my first 5 went into 5/8" so I shot the bent ones too. Those three hit low left but went into 7/16"?????? Thats the left target.
The velocity baffled me as it is 325.8 fps slower then a hard check.
I then tried them with no filler and the first shot was only 982 fps and the gun was full of unburned powder. I edited it out. The rest were;
SD 41.5, MAD 29.2, ES 96.5, AVE 1315.1 fps. I should have left the bad shot in. Thats the middle group. I never had this bad with a hard check with no filler before and never seen a difference between filler and none.
I then went to the hard check and got this;
SD 9.1, MAD 6.5, ES 23.8, AVE 1555.2. Still lower then normal that I can't explain except for the temperature outside. I usually get 1632 fps. Recoil was back up there and I was having trouble with the butt on the bags so I got some stringing. Thats the right target.
The only thing I can make of it is the annealed check has less friction and is leaving the bore too fast to burn the powder. I had very tight case tension and a good crimp. How do I ever explain the group I got with 138 fps difference?
SD 56.9, MAD 37.7, ES 138.1, AVE 1229.4 fps
I had three that had real bad runout and I didn't catch it right off. I didn't flare enough to start the boolit. I marked them just to shoot away. I fixed the other cases. BUT, my first 5 went into 5/8" so I shot the bent ones too. Those three hit low left but went into 7/16"?????? Thats the left target.
The velocity baffled me as it is 325.8 fps slower then a hard check.
I then tried them with no filler and the first shot was only 982 fps and the gun was full of unburned powder. I edited it out. The rest were;
SD 41.5, MAD 29.2, ES 96.5, AVE 1315.1 fps. I should have left the bad shot in. Thats the middle group. I never had this bad with a hard check with no filler before and never seen a difference between filler and none.
I then went to the hard check and got this;
SD 9.1, MAD 6.5, ES 23.8, AVE 1555.2. Still lower then normal that I can't explain except for the temperature outside. I usually get 1632 fps. Recoil was back up there and I was having trouble with the butt on the bags so I got some stringing. Thats the right target.
The only thing I can make of it is the annealed check has less friction and is leaving the bore too fast to burn the powder. I had very tight case tension and a good crimp. How do I ever explain the group I got with 138 fps difference?