PDA

View Full Version : Specs from my NEW Lyman 358429



Bigslug
10-05-2012, 10:31 PM
I fired up the new mold today - manufacture dated 5/12. Since there's so much discussion of what this mold number originally was, what it morphed into, what it currently is, and what variations have spun off it, I thought it might be helpful to get the numbers from the current Lyman offering out there for any interested parties.

I cast them of what is estimated to be 23-1 range scrap, the air-cooled ingots for which tested at 9.75 BHN. Water-quenched, the boolits are about 13-14 BHN.

OAL of boolit: .729-731" depending on how clean the sprue cut.

Diameter of rear driving band: .358"

Diameter of front driving band: .354"

Depth of lube groove: .025" (diameter of boolit in the lube groove is .308")

Width of lube groove: .095" at the bottom, .130" at the surface

Front of crimp groove to meplat: approximately .370"

I made a couple of dummy rounds with a few .357 cases of varying lengths. When seated to the crimp groove on a case .005 over the standard trim-to length of 1.28", this gave me a COAL of 1.655". If I add rim thickness to the 1.61" cylinder of my GP100, I get 1.6640 - not much room at all, but it WOULD work.

On a Smith 640-1 with a 1.6" cylinder and a Ruger SP101 with a 1.58" cylinder, seating to the crimp groove is not going to work with the case at trim-to length, BUT the dummy I made on a case trimmed to about 1.24" will (though shorter for the Ruger would be better).

I made a third dummy with a 1.28" case with the brass crimped over the front driving band. This gave the shortest COAL at 1.545" and will handily work in all of the above guns. While not as sexy looking as they are when seated at the crimp groove, I did realize one serious advantage of this approach - the front driving band of the boolit is totally protected from any damage that might occur from pocket carry in speed strips or speed loaders.

EDIT: Oh yeah, with this alloy - 164 grains.

Hope that's useful to somebody. :drinks:

GLL
10-06-2012, 12:55 AM
Very good information ! How about a close-up bullet photo if available?

Jerry

MtGun44
10-06-2012, 09:44 AM
Thanks.

Sounds like more evidence that somebody at Lyman is really paying attention and
doing things correctly - as far as the Keith designs. All of the recent 429421 and 358429
molds that I have owned or seen have been flat bottomed lube grooves and
pretty much "looked right".

Bill

theperfessor
10-06-2012, 09:55 AM
Good post. I might be a little concerned about the front driving band diameter at .354", but I'd shoot it before I'd worry TOO much. It would be nice to see Lyman get out a consistently uniform product.

fecmech
10-06-2012, 01:03 PM
Sounds like Lyman shortened them up a bit. My 70's 358429 oal is .746" and 358439 is .748". Front drive bands .356 and .355 respectively. These are both round lube groove bullets.

Bigslug
10-06-2012, 09:01 PM
Good post. I might be a little concerned about the front driving band diameter at .354", but I'd shoot it before I'd worry TOO much. It would be nice to see Lyman get out a consistently uniform product.

I did some heavy pondering over this issue on posts #16 and #24 of this thread: http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?t=166752

Ahh. . .the mysteries of the universe!

Bigslug
10-06-2012, 09:05 PM
Very good information ! How about a close-up bullet photo if available?

Jerry

mmmmm. . .yeah. . .not that far into the 21st century. It's proven far easier for me to type the thousand words than to photobucket the pic of equal value. Sorry.[smilie=b: