Hang Fire
06-14-2012, 02:55 PM
I was given a box of hand loads done in new Norma brass for 7.62x54, of which five had been fired. The guy told me his Soviet MN 91/30 was so inaccurate with hand loads, he had gotten rid of it.
As I don’t shoot other people’s reloads, I pulled the bullets. The J-word’s miked at .308”, the inside diameter of the fired case necks was .314, so small wonder his MN was inaccurate with the hand loads.
I decided to use the five fired cartridges for a little dry fire practice, but that didn’t pan out. The chamber difference between the rifle they were fired in and my two MN was so great, that no way could they be chambered. (On my M39 Finn, the groove diameter slugged at .311”, on the Tula carbine at .3145”)
To double check, I neck sized a couple of the fired cases, but result was the same, no go. So set up side by side on a flat metal plate and even to the naked eye, the fired case’s shoulders were seen to be stretched much more forward than on unfired cases and some empties fired in my two MN.
As I don’t shoot other people’s reloads, I pulled the bullets. The J-word’s miked at .308”, the inside diameter of the fired case necks was .314, so small wonder his MN was inaccurate with the hand loads.
I decided to use the five fired cartridges for a little dry fire practice, but that didn’t pan out. The chamber difference between the rifle they were fired in and my two MN was so great, that no way could they be chambered. (On my M39 Finn, the groove diameter slugged at .311”, on the Tula carbine at .3145”)
To double check, I neck sized a couple of the fired cases, but result was the same, no go. So set up side by side on a flat metal plate and even to the naked eye, the fired case’s shoulders were seen to be stretched much more forward than on unfired cases and some empties fired in my two MN.