swisscast
01-20-2012, 03:05 PM
New to casting I think I’ve learned a lot at this forum and I’d like to share some of my humble results with you. This is my first post and English is not my native language, so I apologize in advance for any gross errors made (and not corrected by the spell checker ;)). Having a metallurgical background I’ve always wanted to cast my own bullets, but lacked the time and equipment to do so. Last year I’ve finally invested in some basic equipment and started my first project in 9mm Luger.
I was looking for a low cost load working in my SIG 210, SIG 220 and Uzi Pistols. Reliability had top priority with reasonable accuracy as a second. Contrary to popular belief not all Swiss are top shots ;-). In my case I’m the factor limiting performance and not the pistols or loads used. I’ve chosen the Lee molds #90309, #90238 and #90303 for this test. Casting was done with scrap wheel weights. The water dropped bullets showed a HBN of 19 after a couple of days of age hardening. As cast bullet diameter and weight were the following:
• Lee #90309 (.356 / 125gr RN): .357 / 130gr
• Lee #90238 (.356 / 124gr TC): .356 / 126gr
• Lee #90303 (.358 / 158 RF): .359 /162gr
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b830b5ea4.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3526)
Sizing down to .356 (probably too small as I think now) was done with a Lee sizer, a thin layer of LLA applied before and after using the “plastic bag method” described in numerous posts here. I’ve slugged the barrels of my pistols obtaining the following results:
• SIG 210: .358 (mirror surface bore)
• SIG 220: .357 (smooth surface bore)
• Uzi Pistol: .356 (rough surface bore)
For reloading I’ve used S&B cases and CCI small pistol primers. For propellant I’ve chosen Alliant Unique since I later want to load cast .45 ACP, 7.5x55 Swiss and 12ga 00 Buck / 1oz Lee Slugs as well with the same powder (any Unique pet loads for these calibers are welcomed).
Assuming them to be on the safe side – based on what I’ve found in the literature – and after dry testing uncharged samples for “feedability” in my guns the following loads were prepared for testing:
• Lee #90309 (.356 / 125gr RN): 4.0gr Unique, 1.15” OAL
• Lee #90238 (.356 / 124gr TC): 4.4gr Unique, 1.15” OAL
• Lee #90303 (.358 / 158 RF): 3.6gr Unique, 1.12” OAL
• Lee #90303 (.358 / 158 RF): 3. 2gr Unique, 1.09” OAL
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b6e831e46.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3522)
Testing was done at 10 yards, 2x5 shots of each load fairly rapidly to test reliability, followed by five more carefully aimed shots, with the following results:
• Lee #90309, 4.0gr Unique, 1.15” OAL: worked flawlessly in all three guns
• Lee #90238, 4.4gr Unique, 1.15” OAL: worked flawlessly in the SIG 220 and Uzi, 2 out of 15 failures to close the SIG 210 slide completely
• Lee #90303, 3.6gr Unique, 1.12” OAL: worked flawlessly in the SIG 220 and Uzi, fails consistently to close the SIG 210 slide completely
• Lee #90303, 3. 2gr Unique, 1.09” OAL: worked flawlessly in all three guns
None of the cases showed any signs of overpressure on the primers. The cases are clean, without any sooth on the outside. Felt recoil was not different from 125gr FMJ factory rounds. The handloads were however producing considerably more smoke, probably due to the LLA and/or Unique propellant. “Precision” achieved by me was the same for all loads – minute of beer coaster at 10 yards – that’s what I’m usually capable of with factory rounds. Below the pictures with the 5 shots 158RF/3. 2gr Unique/1.09” OAL load:
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b6ff523fa.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3523) http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b70ea19e5.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3524) http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b72058d4f.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3525)
Cleaning after 50 cast rounds showed no leading at all in the SIG 220, a little bit of lead in the SIG 210 and streaks of lead in the Uzi barrel. In fact I’m writing this post while cleaning the Uzi barrel and waiting for the solvent to do its job...
I’ll continue work on the 158RF/3. 2gr Unique/1.09” OAL load, since it seems to work properly, uses the least amount of powder (I’m tight ;-)), makes nice holes in paper and looks somehow mean. The next samples will be sized to .357 and .358 in order to solve the leading problem in the Uzi. I’ll try to do a test at 25 yards next time with some kind of rest to get more significant results and stabilize my shaking hands. In any case I’m very pleased with the results of my first casting test and would like to thank all of you who have contributed their knowledge to get newbies like me started. Of course any comments and suggestions are highly welcomed. Take care!
I was looking for a low cost load working in my SIG 210, SIG 220 and Uzi Pistols. Reliability had top priority with reasonable accuracy as a second. Contrary to popular belief not all Swiss are top shots ;-). In my case I’m the factor limiting performance and not the pistols or loads used. I’ve chosen the Lee molds #90309, #90238 and #90303 for this test. Casting was done with scrap wheel weights. The water dropped bullets showed a HBN of 19 after a couple of days of age hardening. As cast bullet diameter and weight were the following:
• Lee #90309 (.356 / 125gr RN): .357 / 130gr
• Lee #90238 (.356 / 124gr TC): .356 / 126gr
• Lee #90303 (.358 / 158 RF): .359 /162gr
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b830b5ea4.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3526)
Sizing down to .356 (probably too small as I think now) was done with a Lee sizer, a thin layer of LLA applied before and after using the “plastic bag method” described in numerous posts here. I’ve slugged the barrels of my pistols obtaining the following results:
• SIG 210: .358 (mirror surface bore)
• SIG 220: .357 (smooth surface bore)
• Uzi Pistol: .356 (rough surface bore)
For reloading I’ve used S&B cases and CCI small pistol primers. For propellant I’ve chosen Alliant Unique since I later want to load cast .45 ACP, 7.5x55 Swiss and 12ga 00 Buck / 1oz Lee Slugs as well with the same powder (any Unique pet loads for these calibers are welcomed).
Assuming them to be on the safe side – based on what I’ve found in the literature – and after dry testing uncharged samples for “feedability” in my guns the following loads were prepared for testing:
• Lee #90309 (.356 / 125gr RN): 4.0gr Unique, 1.15” OAL
• Lee #90238 (.356 / 124gr TC): 4.4gr Unique, 1.15” OAL
• Lee #90303 (.358 / 158 RF): 3.6gr Unique, 1.12” OAL
• Lee #90303 (.358 / 158 RF): 3. 2gr Unique, 1.09” OAL
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b6e831e46.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3522)
Testing was done at 10 yards, 2x5 shots of each load fairly rapidly to test reliability, followed by five more carefully aimed shots, with the following results:
• Lee #90309, 4.0gr Unique, 1.15” OAL: worked flawlessly in all three guns
• Lee #90238, 4.4gr Unique, 1.15” OAL: worked flawlessly in the SIG 220 and Uzi, 2 out of 15 failures to close the SIG 210 slide completely
• Lee #90303, 3.6gr Unique, 1.12” OAL: worked flawlessly in the SIG 220 and Uzi, fails consistently to close the SIG 210 slide completely
• Lee #90303, 3. 2gr Unique, 1.09” OAL: worked flawlessly in all three guns
None of the cases showed any signs of overpressure on the primers. The cases are clean, without any sooth on the outside. Felt recoil was not different from 125gr FMJ factory rounds. The handloads were however producing considerably more smoke, probably due to the LLA and/or Unique propellant. “Precision” achieved by me was the same for all loads – minute of beer coaster at 10 yards – that’s what I’m usually capable of with factory rounds. Below the pictures with the 5 shots 158RF/3. 2gr Unique/1.09” OAL load:
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b6ff523fa.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3523) http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b70ea19e5.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3524) http://castboolits.gunloads.com/imagehosting/thum_222174f19b72058d4f.jpg (http://castboolits.gunloads.com/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3525)
Cleaning after 50 cast rounds showed no leading at all in the SIG 220, a little bit of lead in the SIG 210 and streaks of lead in the Uzi barrel. In fact I’m writing this post while cleaning the Uzi barrel and waiting for the solvent to do its job...
I’ll continue work on the 158RF/3. 2gr Unique/1.09” OAL load, since it seems to work properly, uses the least amount of powder (I’m tight ;-)), makes nice holes in paper and looks somehow mean. The next samples will be sized to .357 and .358 in order to solve the leading problem in the Uzi. I’ll try to do a test at 25 yards next time with some kind of rest to get more significant results and stabilize my shaking hands. In any case I’m very pleased with the results of my first casting test and would like to thank all of you who have contributed their knowledge to get newbies like me started. Of course any comments and suggestions are highly welcomed. Take care!