The Goose
09-22-2011, 07:37 AM
I am fairly new here and have only posted a few times, although I have lurked for a long time. However, I am fairly active on Norteastshooters.com. Below are two threads that I posted over there that I thought might be relevant to the Black Powder Cartridge forum here:
About 2 years ago I acquired a Pedersoli Quigley model Sharps. It it has a 34" barrel and I replaced the factory sights with a Montana Vintage Arms midrange Soule rear tang sight and a Kelly globe front sight with a spirit level. I got my hands on 20 pieces of brass and locally the only bullet I could find was some 425 gr bullets meant for the 50/70 round, I loaded them up with some smokeless 5744 powder. The results were abysmal. I could barely get on the paper at 50 yards. I was discouraged. I started doing some reading; Paul Mathews, Mike Venturino, Steve Garbe etc and began experimenting with black powder. I also got into bullet casting. I experimented with different powders, bullets, lubes, primers and so on. Always I tried to change only one thing at a time. Sometimes I got dome decent results and other times I was shooting 10" groups at 100 yards. There are just so many variables involved with loading and shooting the BPCR
Yesterday I was at the range and had the best session I have ever had. I may be getting close finally (to what I have no clue). The best bullet I have found so far, for my rifle is a 700 gr. roundnose designed by Dave Higgenbotham of Lone Star Rifle co. in Conroe, Texas, the mold is made by NEI. He calls it his "buffalo bullet" and references loading it over 100 grs of 2F. I cast this bullet from a 20:1 alloy and use SPG lube. It is sized to .512 on a Lyman sizer. The brass is Starline and the primer is Winchester Magnum Large Rifle. I use Swiss 1.5 powder, 95 grs. weighed exactly on a scale for consistency then dropped down a 24" drop tube then a Walters .060 vegetable fiber wad and a slight compression on the load.
Below is one of my targets from yesterday. The single hole to the lower right is a fouling shot from a clean and cold barrel, then 10 consecutive shots with 3 breaths through a blow tube between each shot. (at 100 yards) Not bad for for a 139 year old round loaded with black powder from an equally old rifle design with iron sights.
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Big50001.jpg
The round
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/BigFifty002.jpg
and the rifle
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/BigFifty013.jpg
Second Thread:
Those of you who read my recent post on the .50-90 Sharps know that I finally found a pretty good load for my Pedersoli Quigley Sharps. Of course I cannot leave well enough alone so now I am working on some loads for my other .50-90. This one is a rolling block made by Lonestar Rifle Co. It has a very heavy Green Mountain barrel with the traditional Remington style combination (rough & ready) rear sight and a Beach front sight. Although this rifle weighs a tad over 13 pounds the recoil is absolutely savage. I can see why the old buffalo rifles typically weighed 16 pounds, I cannot imagine firing 100 + rounds a day for extended periods of time with this rifle.
I tried two loads for this monster. Both had the same 700 gr. roundnose bullet cast 20:1 sized to .512 and lubed with SPG. Also Winchester magnum rifle primers and a .060 Walter’s wad with slight compression. One load was 95 grains of Swiss 1 ˝ and the other was 100 grains of Goex 2F. Three breaths through a blow tube between each shot and I swabbed the barrel every 10 shots. I put a total of 60 rounds down range and my shoulder is pounding today. As Mike Venturino put it, the .50-90 is “a thumper at both ends”. Some results are below.
As a side note I have to say, why would anyone in their right mind shoot a .50-90? The .45-70 will do everything the .50-90 can do and more with less recoil, less powder, less lead and a plethora of loading data already available. To make it worse I shoot two of these rifles. I can see why this round was only used briefly and only by professional hide hunters. I suppose the other application, back in the day, would be in Grizzly Bear country. Faced with an enraged charging Grizzly I suspect that no round is too large and recoil would be a very distant secondary concern. Yesterday I was careless on my first shot and the rifle jumped back, the hammer spur punched a hole in my cheek. Lots of blood. Woo hoo!
10 shots with 95 grains of Swiss 1 1/2
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar005-1.jpg
12 shots with Goex 2F
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar011.jpg
The beast at rest
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar004-1.jpg
Another view
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar003-1.jpg
Go ahead, make my day!
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar009.jpg
About 2 years ago I acquired a Pedersoli Quigley model Sharps. It it has a 34" barrel and I replaced the factory sights with a Montana Vintage Arms midrange Soule rear tang sight and a Kelly globe front sight with a spirit level. I got my hands on 20 pieces of brass and locally the only bullet I could find was some 425 gr bullets meant for the 50/70 round, I loaded them up with some smokeless 5744 powder. The results were abysmal. I could barely get on the paper at 50 yards. I was discouraged. I started doing some reading; Paul Mathews, Mike Venturino, Steve Garbe etc and began experimenting with black powder. I also got into bullet casting. I experimented with different powders, bullets, lubes, primers and so on. Always I tried to change only one thing at a time. Sometimes I got dome decent results and other times I was shooting 10" groups at 100 yards. There are just so many variables involved with loading and shooting the BPCR
Yesterday I was at the range and had the best session I have ever had. I may be getting close finally (to what I have no clue). The best bullet I have found so far, for my rifle is a 700 gr. roundnose designed by Dave Higgenbotham of Lone Star Rifle co. in Conroe, Texas, the mold is made by NEI. He calls it his "buffalo bullet" and references loading it over 100 grs of 2F. I cast this bullet from a 20:1 alloy and use SPG lube. It is sized to .512 on a Lyman sizer. The brass is Starline and the primer is Winchester Magnum Large Rifle. I use Swiss 1.5 powder, 95 grs. weighed exactly on a scale for consistency then dropped down a 24" drop tube then a Walters .060 vegetable fiber wad and a slight compression on the load.
Below is one of my targets from yesterday. The single hole to the lower right is a fouling shot from a clean and cold barrel, then 10 consecutive shots with 3 breaths through a blow tube between each shot. (at 100 yards) Not bad for for a 139 year old round loaded with black powder from an equally old rifle design with iron sights.
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Big50001.jpg
The round
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/BigFifty002.jpg
and the rifle
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/BigFifty013.jpg
Second Thread:
Those of you who read my recent post on the .50-90 Sharps know that I finally found a pretty good load for my Pedersoli Quigley Sharps. Of course I cannot leave well enough alone so now I am working on some loads for my other .50-90. This one is a rolling block made by Lonestar Rifle Co. It has a very heavy Green Mountain barrel with the traditional Remington style combination (rough & ready) rear sight and a Beach front sight. Although this rifle weighs a tad over 13 pounds the recoil is absolutely savage. I can see why the old buffalo rifles typically weighed 16 pounds, I cannot imagine firing 100 + rounds a day for extended periods of time with this rifle.
I tried two loads for this monster. Both had the same 700 gr. roundnose bullet cast 20:1 sized to .512 and lubed with SPG. Also Winchester magnum rifle primers and a .060 Walter’s wad with slight compression. One load was 95 grains of Swiss 1 ˝ and the other was 100 grains of Goex 2F. Three breaths through a blow tube between each shot and I swabbed the barrel every 10 shots. I put a total of 60 rounds down range and my shoulder is pounding today. As Mike Venturino put it, the .50-90 is “a thumper at both ends”. Some results are below.
As a side note I have to say, why would anyone in their right mind shoot a .50-90? The .45-70 will do everything the .50-90 can do and more with less recoil, less powder, less lead and a plethora of loading data already available. To make it worse I shoot two of these rifles. I can see why this round was only used briefly and only by professional hide hunters. I suppose the other application, back in the day, would be in Grizzly Bear country. Faced with an enraged charging Grizzly I suspect that no round is too large and recoil would be a very distant secondary concern. Yesterday I was careless on my first shot and the rifle jumped back, the hammer spur punched a hole in my cheek. Lots of blood. Woo hoo!
10 shots with 95 grains of Swiss 1 1/2
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar005-1.jpg
12 shots with Goex 2F
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar011.jpg
The beast at rest
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar004-1.jpg
Another view
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar003-1.jpg
Go ahead, make my day!
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l299/sgoselin/Lonestar009.jpg