PDA

View Full Version : .357 Mag. with Kieth 170 gr. Boolit



Johnw...ski
04-08-2011, 02:37 PM
I am trying to work up a load for some 170 gr. .358 dia. Kieth style flat base boolits. Just got back from the range after trying 12.5 gr. 2400 with CCI 550 primers. The accuracy at 50 yards was terrible. No sign of leading and very clean burning as far as powder residue. The gun was an 8-3/8" model 27. This is a new gun for me but used, around 1980 vintage, so I have no past performance to go back to. I did try some 158 gr. .358 dia. SWC gas check boolits with 14.0 gr. 2400 and CCI 550 primers. The accuracy with te 158 gr. at 50 yds. was ok but not great.

Anyone got any good loads they can share for the 170 gr boolits.

Thanks,

John

subsonic
04-08-2011, 05:15 PM
You must be loading the 170gr boolits in .38 spl cases? Try 12gr of 2400 or AA9 and a 500 primer..... crimp heavily but don't buckle the case. Boolit must be fairly hard, like water dropped WW. This load has worked well for me and a friend in our M28s. Size to fit the throats, probably .357-8" if your gun is like ours. .359" was worse for accuracy.

USSR
04-08-2011, 06:44 PM
I use 13.5gr of 2400 in .357 brass with this bullet. I suggest you do not use magnum primers with 2400 powder. It is not necessary and most people do not use them with 2400.

Don

gon2shoot
04-08-2011, 07:18 PM
I had a S&W that loved the hot loads, couldnt get it where I wanted it without max+ loads. Now I'm not opposed to shooting a hot round, but I traded that one because it gave me no other options.

Ole
04-08-2011, 07:34 PM
15 grains of H110 works well under Lyman 358429 in my T/C with .357 Mag cases.

You have to put a heavy crimp on this bullet to get it to light consistently with the slow powders.

telebasher
04-08-2011, 09:10 PM
Try your A2400 loads with a CCI 500 primer, your accuracy should improve greatly. Elmer said you dont need mag primers with 2400 powder, worked for me just like he said.

David LaPell
04-09-2011, 08:23 AM
The one problem you're likely to encounter is that with normal length .357 brass and the #358429 bullet is that with the N frame revolvers is that the cylinder isn't long enough to accomodate the round with the bullet seated in the crimp groove. You have to crimp the bullet over the forward driving band or trim the brass back. I just use .38 Special +P brass and load it like a hot .38-44 load. Then when I am done I take a black marker and mark the primer so the round doesn't end up in the wrong .38 revolver. (I only use .38 +P brass for these loads anyway.) I always had goof luck with 7.0 grains of Unique with that bullet, in my 5-inch 27-2 had it would cut one little hole at 25 yards.

Bret4207
04-09-2011, 08:40 AM
Can you try .359 boolits? Any sign of your seater sizing the boolit? The 429 has been great for me in my Smiths with similar loads.

ironhead7544
04-09-2011, 08:58 AM
Try IMR4227.

MtGun44
04-09-2011, 09:19 AM
I've had great results with H110, IIRC about 16.3 gr, but PLEASE verify that load, I do not
have my notes available right now and that is from memory. My load is hot but short of
max by a half a grain or more, again, by memory.

Bill

44man
04-09-2011, 09:39 AM
I refuse to use mag primers in the .44 and .45 Colt with 296. I bet the boolits are being driven from the brass before ignition just from primer pressure.
Elmer was right! :Fire:
I had a 27 with an 8-3/8" ribbed barrel long ago and was able to hit 1" targets at 100 yards from prone. I used 2400 and the original 358156 HP with a standard primer. Sorry I can't remember the load.
That gun was a real shooter.
I did have a Bushnell scope on it. I think it was the first ever pistol scope and had to be around 1953 to 1955, too old to remember! :mrgreen:
That is a story in itself. I bought the gun with a 6" barrel and it was nickle plated. Someone gave me a bunch of old .38 loads and I was just loading from my pocket with my .357 loads and the .38's. Bang, pop depending on what was in the chamber. I stopped hitting anything and found one of the old loads never got out of the barrel and the next split the barrel under the muzzle. I sent it to S&W through the mail and had the 8-3/8" ribbed barrel put on, the nickel stripped and S&W bright blue put on.
It cost me $35!
What a wonderful gun it was. :drinks:

fecmech
04-09-2011, 01:35 PM
15 grains of H110 works well under Lyman 358429 in my T/C with .357 Mag cases.

You have to put a heavy crimp on this bullet to get it to light consistently with the slow powders.

+1 on 15/296,H110. Very accurate out of a 6" GP100 and 3 lever guns. I lightly taper crimp on the front drive band to give an OAL of 1.638 which gives me the length I need to fit the GP and that length feeds in all my levers also.

Johnw...ski
04-09-2011, 05:58 PM
Due to load devolpment with my 45-70 BFR revolver I have a large supply of
SR 4759 powder and noticed it listed in my Lyman manual. Does anyone have any experience with that in a .357 Mag.?

John

Johnw...ski
04-13-2011, 10:12 AM
I was looking at another thread which got me to measure the cylinder throats on my model 27 and they are .3570 -.3575 which may or may not be causing my accuracy problem. This gun has never been particularly accurate but better with .38 Special loads than with .357 Magnum loads. I have ordered a reamer to open them up.

The funny thing is my model 14 shoots .38 Special cast boolit loads beautifully with the same throat sizes.

John

Bret4207
04-13-2011, 07:20 PM
Chances are the 14's barrel differs from the 27's and that's why it shoots better even with similar sized throats.

MtGun44
04-13-2011, 07:26 PM
First, how are you measuring your cylinder mouths? If you are sticking a caliper in the hole
and measuring you have a high probablity of getting it wrong for two reasons. First, the
accy of a caliper is inadequate for this measuring job, it is +/- .001. If you measureed .357
it could be .356 or .358 and the tool would be within it's rated tolerance. You need a micrometer
that is rated to .0001" for this measurement, plus you need to drive a slug through the
dismounted cylinder or use gage pins.

I wouldn't open them up unless your groove diameter is large. If you have the relatively
normal .357 groove diameter, you are good to go.

Enco has Fowler brand .0001 mics for around $35 or less, decent brand for a low price.

Bill

David LaPell
04-14-2011, 07:08 AM
A quick way to cheat a little on the chamber mouths is to take a bullet in the diameters of .357 and .358 and to try and drop them through the holes in the cylinder. If they drop through clean with no resistance than the mouths are too small. You're looking for just a little resistance.
I would also recommend trying your load again in .38 Special +P brass. I cannot imagine with your cylinder being long enough to hold that load without it sticking all the way through, and that could be causing a problem. Elmer Keith designed that bullet to be used in a .38-44 revolver. It has never fit in any of my 27-2 revolvers with recessed cylinders without being too long.
Here is my .38-44 Outdoorsman with the 170 grain cast bullet #358429 with 12.5 grains of 2400 at 25 yards, also note that this group was fired one handed from a bench (left arm banged up too much right now to use both).

http://i561.photobucket.com/albums/ss57/Smith29-2/Outdoorsmanmaple.jpg
http://i561.photobucket.com/albums/ss57/Smith29-2/Outdoorsmantgt-1.jpg

BABore
04-14-2011, 10:17 AM
Assuming this is being loaded in 357 Magnum brass, I would up your charge weight incrementally to at least 13.5 grs of 2400 and switch to CCI 500 primers. Magnum primers are not needed or even recommended with 2400 powder. 357's can be fussy on boolit hardness. In mine at least, it seems to prefer a 15 to 20 bhn boolit when driven hard and fast.

subsonic
04-16-2011, 11:52 AM
As seems to be the consensus above:

Use .38SPL cases (+P are better if you can get them, or Starline brand). You don't mention if you are using .357 cases, but if they fit in the gun you would be either trimming the cases to a shorter length (fine) or crimping over the driving band(BAD for accuracy).
Load about 12-12.5gr of 2400 like you are already doing - but use a standard strength, non-magnum primer. I have not had any great success personally with magnum primers and cast boolits.
Make sure boolit is somewhat hard, like water dropped wheel weights.
Make sure boolit won't fall through the end of the cylinder, but isn't way oversize where you are forcing them to chamber.

If that doesn't work reasonably well, it's time to look at the gun, brass and boolits more closely.

What lube is on the boolits?
Are they store bought or did you cast them?
Is your brass worn out and not giving enough case neck tension?
Areyour sizing die and expanding die giving you proper neck tension?
Is your brass trimmed to a somewhat consistent length to create consistent crimps?
Is the gun mechanically sound? Smooth bore, nice crown, decent forcing cone, reasonably tight lockup with bore and cylinders in alignment? Good mainspring strength? (tighten that screw in the front strap about 1 turn and see if it helps)

Just some ideas. Good luck.

Johnw...ski
04-21-2011, 03:20 PM
I started this thread because I wanted to try some 170 gr. boolits in my .357 Mag.
Thinking that the weight of the 170 gr. boolits would limit velocity gas checks would not be neccessary I got some Rim Rock 170 gr. SWC boolits. These are flat base Kieth style boolits. The few that I measured hardness on came in at 22 BHN.

Like many of you know if you have been following this thread I have had no success. I even went ahead and reamed out the cylinder throats to .358 so the bullits would slip through. Yesterday I tried a different powder, 12.5 gr. of SR4759
and the accuracy was terrible. From a rest at 50 yds. they would barely stay on the target which is 22" x 24". I also found signs of leading at the forcing cone and just ahead when I cleaned the gun. I am guessing from load data that the velocities I have been shooting are in the 1150 FPS range. I would have thought that flat base boolits at 22 BHN could handle that but I guess not.

I loaded up some gas checked boolits last night, load #1 was 158 gr. SWC GC from a Lee C358 mold the alloy is unknown but they measured 12.5 BHN, were sized to .358, and were lubed with 50/50 beeswax and alox. A powder charge of
12.9 gr. of 2400 with a CCI 550 primer should be right around 1200 FPS.
Load #2 was another very nice looking Rim Rock boolit, a 170 gr. RNFP GC over
12.7 gr. 2400 and a CCI 550 primer for a velocity that should be around 1150 FPS.

Just for kicks I added my 6" Ruger Blackhawk to the mix when I went to the range today. Well the results were very interesting, the S & W Model 27, 8-3/8", shot either load from a rest at 50 yds. into 3" to 3-1/2" groups. The Ruger did the same. I wouldn't call this exceptional accuracy but it is certainly adequate.

As for the 170 gr. flat base boolits I am sure they will shoot if they are loaded slow enough but the whole point was to have a magnum load.

John

Char-Gar
04-21-2011, 03:40 PM
There is nothing wrong with 3 to 3.5 inch 50 yard groups.

NHlever
04-21-2011, 05:23 PM
For one reason, or another, that boolit the Lyman 358429 either works, or doesn't work for folks, and there doesn't seem to be much in between. The more I read about it, the more I wonder why this is. Up front I have to say that I have many other .358 molds, and haven't used that one, but I sure am curious. The design seems good with lots of bearing surface, and a wide bottom driving band. Elmers designs usually shoot pretty well though in my guns the Thompson designs have always been slightly better. In .357 I like the Lee RF designs pretty well too. Back to the 358429, I wonder if the nose of that boolit is just so long that the front driving band doesn't ever get into the throats of most cylinders before it sticks out the front? It would be interesting to take enough off the front of a few of them so that they could be crimped in the crimp groove in standard .357 mag cases, and see how they shoot. It would give you a larger meplat too. :D

Love Life
04-21-2011, 05:44 PM
There is nothing wrong with 3 to 3.5 inch 50 yard groups.

Unless you are shooting mini animals like the giraff from the Direct TV commercial.

fecmech
04-21-2011, 07:33 PM
The 358429 is a very accurate bullet IMO and also plain base bullets can perform very well at magnum velocities. In the groups below the 2 paper plates were shot at 100 yds with 358429 at 1630 FPS in a Rossi lever gun. The one 10 shot group was 2.75" and the other also 2.75" for 9 shots, I wiffed #10! The revolver targets above are 20 shot groups which are a series of four 5 shot groups where I move the paper behind the main target to catch each individual group along with the total. The left target was shot using just 1 bullet from a 4 cav mold and the other was using a mix of all the bullets from the mold. The average 5 shot group size for the groups was 1.91" and these were chrono'd at about 1250 FPS so you don't need to go slow to get accuracy with PB bullets. Elmer designed a pretty good bullet I think!

Frank
04-21-2011, 08:14 PM
Lyman 358429:

http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-15321267663876_2151_473265

fecmech: What BH are you using with the boolit?

fecmech
04-21-2011, 11:06 PM
I'm guessing you mean BHN?? The revolver groups above were shot with a 50/50 ww/lino bullet. Group averages open up approx 1" with ACWW. The rifle groups were shot with ACWW. The rifles do not seem to need the 50/50 mix as it shoots no better than ACWW in the rifles.

Frank
04-22-2011, 01:35 AM
fecmech:
I'm guessing you mean BHN?? The revolver groups above were shot with a 50/50 ww/lino bullet. Group averages open up approx 1" with ACWW. The rifle groups were shot with ACWW. The rifles do not seem to need the 50/50 mix as it shoots no better than ACWW in the rifles.
I see. So you also tried ACWW's. Did you every try WD anything?

fecmech
04-22-2011, 10:41 AM
fecmech:
I see. So you also tried ACWW's. Did you every try WD anything?

I tried one brief test with some WDWW bullets and they shot no better than the ACWW. I am not sure why that was but did not pursue it. The 50/50 mix works and I have a fair amount of lino. My high volume shooting is .38 spl for Hunters Pistol and .38 level loads in my rifles. I probably shoot slightly less than 1000 rds per year now of mag level handgun loads.

TCLouis
04-22-2011, 01:45 PM
It may just not be that accurate of a gun in the first place. Not all revolvers seem to have the cutting edge accuracy we all expect these days.
I saw were you opened the cylinder throats to .358" what does the barrel slug out to be?
Will it shoot the funny coated bullets any better?

I have found some guns to be very persnickety with the loads they like, some much more than others.

My SRH likes most anything and loves lots of loads. My GP100 is a different story so far.

Oh, how are you "resting the gun for the load developement.

TCLouis
04-22-2011, 02:30 PM
Duplicate post information removed by author

Johnw...ski
04-22-2011, 03:32 PM
It may just not be that accurate of a gun in the first place. Not all revolvers seem to have the cutting edge accuracy we all expect these days.
I saw were you opened the cylinder throats to .358" what does the barrel slug out to be?
Will it shoot the funny coated bullets any better?

I have found some guns to be very persnickety with the loads they like.

My SRH likes most anything and loves lots of loads. My GP100 is a different story so far

Well I did shoot 125 gr. JHP with WW 296 powder, didn't bother looking up the load since there is only one, these shot great and I didn't have any reason to bench rest them. They were left over rounds from another revolver from way back when and I used the last of them up. Like I mentioned earlier I had some 158 gr.
SWC GC that seemed acccurate and again I had no reason to bench rest them for groups.

As for a rest I am using a rifle rest with a v-bag and resting the barrel in the v.
The groups were so bad with the 170 gr. PB boolits it looked like I didn't know how to shoot or wasn't focusing on the front sight. I am a little more experienced than that and have been simultaneously been working on loads for my BFR 45-70
(see 45-70 Revolver thread) and was getting some really nice groups with that so I am sure the problem wasn't me.

I didn't bother slugging the barrel, I know I should, but the boolits I am using are
.358 dia. and are not going to work well if they get sized down before they reach the barrel.

I believe that the plain base boolits were getting the bases damaged, for whatever reason, and then were not leaving the barrel cleanly. The leading I was seeing was not the classic leading that is really stuck to the barrel. It was more like some lead shards that could be removed with a patch while cleaning.

Anyway I am reasonably happy with the level of accuracy I have acheived (3" to
3-1/2" at 50 yds.) and I can still play with loads if I want to try improving the groups. I'll just take the easy way out and use gas checked boolits. This is not a gun I expect to use a lot anyway. Now, I am having so much fun with the 45-70 revolver, I expect to shoot that one a lot, but thats another story.

John

leadman
04-23-2011, 03:10 AM
Alliant says to use standard primers, not magnum with 2400. Yes, it does make a difference in my S&W 27-2.
The barrel dimensions could be less than ideal so should be checked. Also run a tight fitting patch in the bore to check for a barrel restriction where it is screwed into the frame.

I have shot that boolit into gallon milk jugs at 100 yards consistently when plinking. Sold the mold and bought a Saeco 180gr RFN and less hassle and better accurracy.