WidenersRepackboxSnyders JerkyInline Fabrication
MidSouth Shooters SupplyLoad DataLee PrecisionRotoMetals2
Titan Reloading
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Epa wants to ban all lead ammo/projectiles

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    METRO DETRIOT
    Posts
    275

    Epa wants to ban all lead ammo/projectiles

    This is something that everyone needs to act on and get the word out.

    http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=94797

    The ramifications would be staggering. The proposed taxes, and other anti gun ammunition bans could be answered in one fell swoop if this were to go through. Please take ten minutes and a dollar in postage to your representatives.

  2. #2
    Moderator Emeritus


    Trey45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dismal Swamp NC
    Posts
    4,436
    We've got no less than 6 threads on this very topic.
    Give us this day our daily lead.

    Sic Semper Tyrannis.

    If you don't want 1984 you're going to need some 1776.
    WWGWD

  3. #3
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    METRO DETRIOT
    Posts
    275
    Sorry, looked around and didn't see them.

  4. #4
    Moderator Emeritus


    Trey45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dismal Swamp NC
    Posts
    4,436
    Give us this day our daily lead.

    Sic Semper Tyrannis.

    If you don't want 1984 you're going to need some 1776.
    WWGWD

  5. #5
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    METRO DETRIOT
    Posts
    275
    I did a search after your first post and saw that. Thanks though, I too am prone to some knee jerking.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    888
    Note the usual "Progressive compliant" headline about the EPA "Surrendering" to the NRA.
    As if the EPAs over reaching was the right thing to do and the evil NRA stopped them. The only thing missing was a quote from some young mother crying about the tradgedy of "lead based" bullets.
    And a few people STILL believe in journalism.
    "Investment" is the new "Throw money at it!"

    Detectives, and Cobras, and Agents!
    Oh my!

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    qajaq59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SC Florida
    Posts
    1,311
    And a few people STILL believe in journalism
    Yup, and some think the earth is flat as well..........
    Qajaq59

    One slow hit is better then 500 quick misses. "It ain't the noise that kills 'em!!!!"

  8. #8
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    63
    The EPA has become the "enforcement" arm of the Libs. We may have won this recent battle, but the war is ongoing. Drilling for oil, air cooled engines (Harley), etc. are also in their sights.

  9. #9
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Olympic Peninsula, Washington
    Posts
    19
    Cross posted from another thread, here is the EPA's response:
    http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/pub...n_Response.pdf

  10. #10
    Moderator Emeritus


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SW Montana
    Posts
    12,505
    [The Montana Gianni] Front sight and squeeze

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master

    MtGun44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    eastern Kansas- suburb of KC
    Posts
    15,023
    As I understand it, the EPA is specifically prohibited from regulating ammunition.

    Bill
    If it was easy, anybody could do it.

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master JIMinPHX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Moving back east now
    Posts
    5,099
    Quote Originally Posted by honus View Post
    air cooled engines (Harley), etc. are also in their sights.
    What's their misguided rationale on that one?
    “an armed society is a polite society.”
    Robert A. Heinlein

    "Idque apud imperitos humanitas vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset."
    Publius Tacitus

  13. #13
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    29˚68’27”N, 99˚12’07”W
    Posts
    14,662
    Quote Originally Posted by JIMinPHX View Post
    What's their misguided rationale on that one?
    High combustion temps of air-cooled engines = increased NoX emissions (same with Diesel engines), and NoX has been the CARB and EPA's nutbag trumpet for the last couple of years, right along with formaldehyde and CO2.

    The popular destruction of the last visages of production in this country are based on such bandwagons. They've outlawed or regulated the harmful stuff, now they are on to inventing new ways to prove the remaining things are harmful, getting the media on the bandwagon with "green" catch-phrases and hate-mongering propaganda, then on to representatives and congressmen, you know the rest.

    Quick, tell all the tree-hugging, whale-saving, tofu-munching, VOLKSWAGON BUS DRIVING, washed-up hippies that, according to their own experts, their air-cooled engines have been destroying the planet for the last fifty years!!!! How do you like THAT?

    Gear

  14. #14
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    409
    The EPA has backed off on this. No fear for the moment. Still thinking about sinkers though.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    qajaq59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SC Florida
    Posts
    1,311
    If you not an NRA member, and you aren't registered to vote, NOW is a good time to do both!!!!!
    Qajaq59

    One slow hit is better then 500 quick misses. "It ain't the noise that kills 'em!!!!"

  16. #16
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    530
    Maybe I am stupid when I question this panic of lead and the talks about its poisonous effects..
    Here in Finland we have one very famous ants nest.. It is a bit to the heavy side, because the ants desided to built it from LEAD SHOTS..
    With my little brains I can not understand how come there is still ants in it and that it actually becomes bigger every year.. If the lead is so harmful and poisonous, how come the ants.. so tiny incects are not harmed in any way..?
    MAYBE.. Because the Lead oxidices when it is in open air..
    It creates its own protective shell that prevents the lead to spread.


    S

  17. #17
    Moderator Emeritus




    Dean D.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NE Washington State
    Posts
    1,992
    Seppos, the problem lies in logic. Whereas your ants are obviously logical thinkers and builders, our liberal eco fanatics are not. Go figure.
    "The worst wheel of the cart makes the most noise." - Benjamin Franklin

    "To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson


  18. #18
    Moderator Emeritus


    Trey45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dismal Swamp NC
    Posts
    4,436
    I learn something new every day. Until just now I had no idea that Finland was the home to SUPER ANTS who are impervious to the perils and evils of lead.





    Dean D, when trying to use logic on libtards, you have to remember it's like a foreign language with them.
    Give us this day our daily lead.

    Sic Semper Tyrannis.

    If you don't want 1984 you're going to need some 1776.
    WWGWD

  19. #19
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    530
    Well.. we are a bit of a rare breed.. as Koskela said in Unknown Soldier.. "I am Koskela from Finland.. I eat Iron and **** chain!"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utRh6...eature=related
    Maybe the ants are a bit same here..

    S
    Last edited by seppos; 08-29-2010 at 02:15 PM.

  20. #20
    Boolit Master captain-03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    614
    Quote Originally Posted by Dframe View Post
    Note the usual "Progressive compliant" headline about the EPA "Surrendering" to the NRA.
    As if the EPAs over reaching was the right thing to do and the evil NRA stopped them. The only thing missing was a quote from some young mother crying about the tradgedy of "lead based" bullets.
    And a few people STILL believe in journalism.
    Well, I do not believe the NRA position on the issue was the reason the EAP rejected it .... Too political of an issue so close to the Nov elections ... the administration can ill afford ANOTHER issue so opposed by many .... This was a political decision, IMHO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check