Snyders JerkyLoad DataMidSouth Shooters SupplyRepackbox
Titan ReloadingLee PrecisionInline FabricationRotoMetals2
Wideners
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Reading the spent bullets...

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Orange Co. CA
    Posts
    183

    Reading the spent bullets...

    This bullet trap is fascinating to a geek like me. I can’t wait each time to dig out the bullets and see what they look like.

    I loaded up 50 rounds of .357 mag with #105, (lot # 71195) last week and launched them downrange today. #105 is supposed to be AA#5 equivalent. I found something interesting when I retrieved the bullets from my (shredded tire) bullet trap. The front driving band was gone because the nose had slumped back, shortening the bullet noticeably. I have never seen this before. I don’t think that this is caused by the shredded tire mulch, because it hasn’t happened with other bullets, and some 358156’s fired at the same time, with different, but top-end loads and similar Bhn didn’t show this. Of course, I could be wrong. I can't remember if I've fired the 358311 into the trap before.
    "A" shows an unfired (but not a prime example) of the 358311. "B - D" shows the fired 358311's.



    There was no leading, but primers were flattened on all but the lowest loads, with striated impressions of the firing pin bushing(?), or whatever that's called stamped on the primer. The lowest load was put together with the bullet crimped above the driving band, which is the only way to get the 1.590" OAL recommended. Brass dropped right out of the cylinder on the lower end loads, and had to be coaxed out with heavier loads.

    .357 magnum R-P nickel plated brass, once fired
    358311 RN 0.359” lubed with Felix lube...wheelweights, Bhn 14-15 on my Cabine Tree gizmo
    CCI 550 magnum primers
    Accurate Arms most recent load data for AA#5, lowest to nearly highest, 8.1 - 8.9 grains
    Ruger Blackhawk (3 screw), bore size 0.357.5”

    Also interesting was the nearly completely collapsed lube grooves, the severely pounded gas check base, and the lead smeared on the gas check of the 358156’s. (E, F & G) These were similar in hardness, and loaded pretty hot with WC820.

    Here are some more retrieved bullets:


    [edit: The 358439 is actually 358430!]

    No slumping on the swc's, but they were fired with .38 Special loads. The 358439 does show a bit of slumping, so maybe it's a round nose phenomenon? (Actually the OAL of the fired boolit is only .002" shorter than an unfired one.)

    I wasn't sure if the 457125's were going to be able to engrave properly in my Trapdoor's generous bore, but spent boolit analysis back in my ballistics lab shows full engraving all along the length of the bullet.

    The biggest pain was a set of brittle Fat 30's that went all the way through the rubber mulch and shattered against the steel plate. They had to be mined to get them separated from the mulch. (Most people would have left them, but I seem to have an obsessive thing going.) On the up side, they were used to win a practice high-power match - Argentine Mauser vs M-14's.

    The 439186 was paper-patched and fired in a rolling block with a very fat .446" bore and they still show rifling.
    Last edited by StanDahl; 02-21-2010 at 05:09 PM.

  2. #2
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,377
    Maybee they are not slumping, but being smeared back?

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    TCFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Missouri Ozarks
    Posts
    1,139
    Stan
    Would it be possible to post a photo of your bullet trap?

    Also the boolit that you have marked as 358439 looks like a round nose.I think a 358439 is a hollow point version of 358429.......Terry

  4. #4
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Orange Co. CA
    Posts
    183
    NSP64: " Maybee they are not slumping, but being smeared back? "

    It could be true. I measured the bullets, and the fired bullets are on average .04" shorter than unfired bullets. This could be from impact with the rubber mulch, except I hadn't seen that even with rifle bullets of the same hardness fired at much faster speed. That made me suspect slumping, but I might have reached that conclusion just because it sounded more interesting than the alternative!

    Quote Originally Posted by TCFAN View Post
    Stan
    Would it be possible to post a photo of your bullet trap?

    Here's what it looked like a while back, before I mounted wheels (just like the ones on the dolly) and wheelbarrow handles. The target frame helps to keep me from shooting the trap accidentally with unfamiliar loads/sight settings. It's also about 6" shorter than shown here - it was just too heavy at 36" long, and I found that even the 525 gr 457125's loaded full blast with 70 grains of FFg weren't hitting the plate in the back.


    Also the boolit that you have marked as 358439 looks like a round nose.I think a 358439 is a hollow point version of 358429.......Terry
    You're right, it's supposed to be 358430 - oops!

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    TCFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Missouri Ozarks
    Posts
    1,139
    Neat I really like that trap. I will have to look into building one myself.How much rubber would one that size hold and where would one go to get it?.Terry

  6. #6
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Orange Co. CA
    Posts
    183
    Holy crumb rubber - I already posted something almost exactly like this once before. (I'm not old enough for a senior moment excuse either.) I got excited about the 'slumped' boolits and forgot about the old one.

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...et+trap&page=8

    This thread was a good one, but it got split up and the one I posted on didn't achieve stickydom.

    My trap holds about 8 bags of rubber mulch, which I got at Lowe's. Check out the thread listed above for more info. There's also an undead, can't ever die sticky version of that thread on bullet traps - it's on "Classics and Stickies".

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    972
    Think maybe your boolits aren't lubed good enough or too snug in the barrel.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    lwknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas where the west begins
    Posts
    3,418
    I think that everything is just perfect. My theory is that the boolits are compacting and squeezing out the lube grooves. The front groove goes first as it spreads lube into the bore and the second would follow if your barrel were long enough. The second groove is held open by hydraulic pressure kinds like in a swaging die.
    When swaging a hollow point , folks use lube in the grooves to keep the grooves from being wiped out .

    Just for grins, try some with lube in the front groove only to see if the rear groove gets squeezed out to fill the void.

    Oh I just looked at the picture again. the leading groove is a crimp groove without any lube in it. so that explains it.
    Last edited by lwknight; 02-21-2010 at 05:59 PM. Reason: Another look
    Sent from my PC with a keyboard and camera on it with internet too.
    Melting Stuff is FUN!
    Shooting stuff is even funner

    L W Knight

  9. #9
    Boolit Master

    jdgabbard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,649
    In example D the nose of the 311 is NOTABLY SHORTER then the others, and C looks to be shorter as well. I think there is more at play then just the grooves...
    JDGabbard's Feedback Thread

    Jdgabbard's very own boolit boxes pattern!

    GOA and FPC have done more in the last decade than your NRA has done in it's entire existence... Support the ones that actually do something for you.

  10. #10
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Orange Co. CA
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by sheepdog View Post
    Think maybe your boolits aren't lubed good enough or too snug in the barrel.
    The bore is 0.3575", give or take .0001, and the bullets are sized to .359" on a Lee push-through before being lubed on an RCBS luber at 0.360", so they are only 0.0015" over groove size. The lube is Felix' World Famous Lube, so that can't possibly be the problem!

  11. #11
    In Remembrance
    montana_charlie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West of Great Falls, Montana
    Posts
    8,414
    Nice little setup for catching bullets.
    I wonder what ever happened to the long box with the cooked rice...
    CM
    Retired...TWICE. Now just raisin' cows and livin' on borrowed time.

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master 303Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    9,078
    Just for grins, try some with lube in the front groove only to see if the rear groove gets squeezed out to fill the void.
    I think lwknight is dead on. I would suggest removing some lube in two opposing spots to see what happens.

    I did see your trap on the other thread but no matter, I had forgotten it. It's flippin' clever! I'm gonna do it too! (With a teensy weensy bit of modification - so's I can use mine in my ... ummm ... suburban back yard! )
    Rest In Peace My Son (01/06/1986 - 14/01/2014)

    ''Assume everything that moves is a human before identifying as otherwise''

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check