RepackboxSnyders JerkyTitan ReloadingWideners
RotoMetals2Inline FabricationLee PrecisionMidSouth Shooters Supply
Load Data
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 327 Federal Magnum Factory vs Reloads in a Ruger LCR 2" Revolver

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy Liberty1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    The Free State of Arizona
    Posts
    392

    327 Federal Magnum Factory vs Reloads in a Ruger LCR 2" Revolver

    327 Federal Magnum 85-grain JHP (Federal factory) out of my 6-shot Ruger Model 5452 1.875" LCR averages 1159.5 feet per second.

    Per Hodgdon, I loaded up those spent cases with a 100-grain Hornady XTP JHP over 6.9 grains (individually weighed) of Hodgdon CFE Pistol (7.0 grains max) and a CCI 500 small pistol primer.

    Velocity: 1249.5 fps. This is faster than a lighter factory 85-gr JHP. I'm nervous.

    They also exhibit flattened primers (which I hear is somewhat normal) and stout recoil, but, worse, did not eject from the cylinder easily. I had to push the ejector rod onto the bench to extract the brass. Does not sound ideal.

    I'm planning on backing off on the load a few tenths.

    Any suggestions?

  2. #2
    Boolit Man Alasgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Wasilla Alaska
    Posts
    88
    Food for thought.
    I shoot 32 s&W long’s in mine. 100 gr bullet traveling slow enough to see them fly over water! Kind of like a 22 short only 32.
    I use them to shoot Halibut off the side of the boat and just for general plinking.

    Not much noise, dont save the brass, bought on line they’re plenty affordable and at 70 my fingers aren’t nimble enough to reload them anyway; or maybe im just too lazy.

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master
    rintinglen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Orange, VA NOW
    Posts
    6,559
    Assuming the cylinder chambers are not scored, that load is too hot for your gun. If you have to pound out the spent cases, that is too much of a good thing. Check the accuracy of your scale, just to be sure you are getting what you think you are, and if so, then back off a good ways. IIRC the start load is down around 6.0 grains and that's where I'd go.

    Now, if the chamber walls are scored, you have a gun problem that will mean a trip back to Ruger.
    _________________________________________________It's not that I can't spell: it is that I can't type.

  4. #4
    Boolit Buddy Liberty1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    The Free State of Arizona
    Posts
    392
    The LCR is brand new, and shot all six without complaint, but the shells did not want to slide out of the cylinder. Not good. The factory ammo slid out just fine.

    Hodgdon starting load for 327 Fed Mag is 5.9 grains of CFE Pistol.

    Max is 7.0 grains CFE Pistol.

    I'll dial it back.

  5. #5
    Boolit Grand Master

    Wayne Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hampton Roads, Virginia
    Posts
    13,690
    Just goes to prove that every gun is different, and we need to keep aware of this when loading near max.
    Wayne the Shrink

    There is no 'right' that requires me to work for you or you to work for me!

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    375RUGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,707
    Good loading practice is to start under the maximum listed charge and "work up", increasing the powder charge as you go, keeping an eye for the tell-tell signs of pressure increases.
    Taking your example of 100g XTP and CFE powder, and assuming that I wanted an accurate load somewhere near max velocity, I would have loaded a cylinder full of 6.4g, 6.6g, 6.8g, 7.0g. I would shoot all 4 to see which is the most accurate. Obvisously eliminating a load if it shows signs of too much pressure. Then I would load 2 or 3 cylinders full of that most accurate load for verification.
    Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -- H.L. Mencken

    The notion that a radical is one who hates his country is naïve and usually idiotic. He is, more likely, one who likes his country more than the rest of us, and is thus more disturbed than the rest of us when he sees it debauched. He is not a bad citizen turning to crime; he is a good citizen driven to despair.― H.L. Mencken

  7. #7
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Council(area),Idaho
    Posts
    27
    Also of note, according to Speer reloading manual, small rifle primers (not magnum) are to be used in .327 magnum.
    NRA Benefactor member

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Western NC
    Posts
    3,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Liberty1776 View Post
    They also exhibit flattened primers (which I hear is somewhat normal)
    Normal? Well, decades ago primers were made with domed cups that did flatten a bit under great pressure but they have long been made with flat cups. Thus, contrary to conventional web wisdom, "flat" primers tell us virtually nothing reliable about chamber pressure.

    (I'll mention that truly flat primers can be excellent indicators of headspace tho; radically flat primers tell us if there's a lot of slop in the chamber fit. But even that's unlikely to matter with rimmed straight wall cases.)

    ...and stout recoil, but, worse, did not eject from the cylinder easily. I had to push the ejector rod onto the bench to extract the brass. Does not sound ideal.
    Ouch; that really ain't ideal.

    Flat primers don't mean much but sticky extraction always tells us a LOT about very high chamber pressures! Cases stick ONLY when the steel chamber expands (balloons) out from the pressure and then contracts back more than the stretchy brass case can expand and contract so the fired cases are then tightly gripped by the chamber walls. If you expand those sticky chambers just a tad more things might start coming from together in your hand. In fact, you may have already jugged your cylinder's chambers.

    I'm planning on backing off on the load a few tenths.

    Any suggestions?
    Yeah; back off. NOW. I'd drop at least five of those tenths and maybe ten of those tenths and - maybe - slowly work my charge back up and settle just below where the sticking returns.

    * Notes to avoid flat primers and over stretched cases:

    > First, forget about FL sizing cases by pushing them into a sizer as far as they can be pushed, that's rarely helpful and leads to early case failures.

    > Next, properly FL size all of your bottle neck cases at their shoulders (I mean size your cases so they actually fit your chamber) and unhappy flattened primers and head separations won't happen.

    > You now know exactly why we are told to "start lower than book max and work up slowly unless/until you reach book max OR until you see early evidences of excessive pressure (like, especially, sticking cases)." Thing is, this reloading stuff is an art, it's not a totally predictable science. The best our reloading book makers can do is tell us the results they got in their guns while using their components on the day they did their tests; theirs' is not ours.

    * IMHO, NO ONE can tell anyone else the maximum safe loads for THEIR GUN with their different components so anyone blithely going directly to a book max load is open to injury.

    * IMHO, anyone needing to weight handgun charges to avoid a KABOOM! is probably working far too close to disaster and is still quite likely to get one.

    * IMHO, if normal loads for a little .32 Magnum doesn't have the desired punch trade it for a .357 or .44 mag. If that's normally too much recoil to comfortably handle, use light (for caliber) bullets
    and load it down. ???

  9. #9
    Boolit Buddy Liberty1776's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    The Free State of Arizona
    Posts
    392
    I'm attempting to duplicate the velocity (1190 fps out of my LCR) of the Federal factory 327 Federal Magnum load with its 85 gr JHP, which appears to be the Hornady XTP. And also experiment with the 100 gr XTP JHP.

    I downloaded from the Hodgdon max.

    I then downloaded a full half grain from the max.

    It's still difficult to extract.

    I'm going to minimum for CFE Pistol.

    May move to a different, less active powder. I thought CFE Pistol would work. May be too much of a good thing.

    May try Universal powder or my Old Reliable, Winchester 231.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	327 federal mag 85 gr XTP hodgdon data .jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	34.0 KB 
ID:	297771

  10. #10
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Western NC
    Posts
    3,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Liberty1776 View Post
    .... I downloaded a full half grain from the max.

    It's still difficult to extract.
    Try a few rounds of factory ammo again, see if they still extract properly.

    Thing is, if you've already jugged your revolver's chambers (permanently swelled the middle with over-loads) then even normal pressures will make cases expand to fit the fat part and that will still make extraction difficult. I once did that with a .44 magnum S&W using 250 Gr. SWC and Unique. The recoil was sharp, both the velocity and accuracy was great but I don't do that anymore!
    Last edited by 1hole; 03-25-2022 at 11:16 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check