Inline FabricationRepackboxLee PrecisionTitan Reloading
MidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersLoad DataRotoMetals2
Snyders Jerky
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Ruger GP 100 lightening

  1. #1
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Beavercreek Ohio
    Posts
    73

    Ruger GP 100 lightening

    I have a Ruger GP 100 SS with a six inch barrel. The grip feels really good to me for one handed bullseye competition shooting but it is nose heavy. If I drilled out the under lug do you think there would be enough weight removed to make a noticeable difference?
    Thanks
    Gene

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    NW Michigan
    Posts
    105
    I don't know if that would help any but if you could trade it for a 4" it might solve your problems. I've got a 4" GP 100 and love it. I think my Smith model 14 might be slightly more accurate tho.
    Bullseyes to you,
    Jack

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,794
    a 5/16 drill run 3 inches deep will remove 1 oz of steel, according to my calculations. Steel is 4.566 oz/cuin. I was considering the same thing, but I found a 6 inch no lug GP100
    “You don’t practice until you get it right. You practice until you can’t get it wrong.” Jason Elam, All-Pro kicker, Denver Broncos

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    4,721
    Add weight to the Butt of the gun first and see if it makes a differance in the balance.

  5. #5
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,620
    Why not just mill off the underlug back to nearly the front of the cylinder pin/ejection rod? I've liked the GP 100 but don't like the wt. for a .357. To me, a .357's main asset is it can be made much lighter than a .44, etc., and that's negated when you carry a heavy gun anyway. I'd really like to have one that's been lightened significantly, but haven't found one in my price range .... yet. Very good guns, but just too heavy for me in my old age!

  6. #6
    Boolit Buddy
    zarrinvz24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Heart of the Lowcountry, SC
    Posts
    454
    I have two 6" Pythons, both are 1963 mfd but one had the barrel replaced at the Colt factory ~ 1968. In plain language this means that the guns are nearly identical and within 1K serials of eachother but one has a solid lug barrel and the other a hollow lug. There is a noticeable difference in the way they handle. The hollow lug points faster; the solid lug feels somewhat front heavy. Between the two I prefer to shoot the solid lug Python, the extra weight up front soaks up more recoil and puts you back on target faster.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master


    fecmech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Buffalo NY area
    Posts
    4,036
    With the stainless gun you have just mill off the lug as previously suggested. Add some judicious file work and you can have a nice barrel like Ruger used to make. When I bought my GP back in the 90's you could get both lugged and unlugged. I bought the unlugged due to the weight issue.
    "Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyrannies.” Aristotle

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check