MidSouth Shooters SupplyRotoMetals2Lee PrecisionRepackbox
Inline FabricationTitan ReloadingLoad DataSnyders Jerky
Wideners
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Clearly, I am the biggest, hardest headed, doofus on the planet ... size matters!!

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sand Coulee, Montana
    Posts
    251

    Clearly, I am the biggest, hardest headed, doofus on the planet ... size matters!!

    Marlin 1894c .357 magnum. Groove diameter = .359

    I have been trying to put together a load for this rifle for about a year ... I was just sure that a .359 boolit would bump up to groove diameter and grab that micro-groove barrel just fine.

    Load: NOE 360 180 WFN GC. Alloy is 50/50 lead/ww. 15.0 gr. Lil' Gun. Distance - 50 yards.

    The 6 rounds that make up the ragged hole are sized .360 (as cast) and the two on the left are sized .359 ... same alloy, boolit, and powder load, same POA.

    Class is now dismissed .......


  2. #2
    Perma-Banned


    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Collegeville, PA
    Posts
    1,908
    it is amazing what .001 can make.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    940
    Don't feel bad. I can't tell you the alloy I wasted trying to figure out what BHN shot better in my barrels. I got schooled in barrel/throat fit a few years ago and am enjoying my cast shooting instead of pulling my hair out trying to mold perfect alloy slugs.
    Fit is king around here.
    Every shot you get in life counts

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Missouri Ozarks
    Posts
    1,240
    Why only two shots for the .359? If you had fired six you may have ended up with a group that looked like the six shot .360 group. Actually the latter's extreme spread is greater than that for the .359.

    I too believe it is best to use a large bullet and forget about 'bumping them up'. Start big enough in the first place and let the gun do the sizing.

  5. #5
    Boolit Grand Master

    MBTcustom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    6,994
    Nah, I win. 15 years doing it wrong, and figuring "you just can't expect much from a cast lead boolit" figure about 10 buckets of COWW and not one blessed one of them was the right size. Uuugggg!
    5-18-2011, you know that sound you heard about midnight? That was the forehead slap heard round the world when I read Molly's thread:
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...nk-so-try-this
    That was the biggest lightbulb moment that I have had on castboolits.com. Of course I felt like a complete idiot, and rightly so, for wasting all that lead, but I'll take that any day. If all my problems were that easy to fix, I'd be a happy man!
    Precision in the wrong place is only a placebo.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master sthwestvictoria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    south west victoria, australia
    Posts
    783
    Quote Originally Posted by goodsteel View Post
    That was the biggest lightbulb moment that I have had on castboolits.com. Of course I felt like a complete idiot, and rightly so, for wasting all that lead, but I'll take that any day. If all my problems were that easy to fix, I'd be a happy man!
    Goodsteel didn't you have another thread with photographs of two projectiles losing rifling engraving?
    I just had a hunt for that thread but could not locate it.

    There is also a good deal of similar debate going on at this thread:
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...2500-FPS/page2

    I agree with BAGTIC that only two shots does not make a group - it may be a smaller group than the .360 if the next shot lands between the two!
    What is more interesting (if they had the same point of aim) is why the .359 is off to the left.
    Last edited by sthwestvictoria; 03-24-2013 at 04:07 PM.
    ars longa, vita brevis

  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sand Coulee, Montana
    Posts
    251
    The two rounds sized .359 were fired as the same POA. If all of them were sized .359 the group would have been much much larger. For comparison, here is a shot of the larger target I was shooting at with the other loads I was testing (14.4 to 15.0 gr of Lil Gun) There is a line drawn from each group to the circle i was using as the POA. All the other loads I was firing were sized .359.



    Thew thread you were looking for is here I think - http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...-alloy-results

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Doc Highwall's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ct
    Posts
    4,615
    MtJerry, now you will have to open your sizing die to .360" or buy one. Think what might happen if you could shoot a bullet that is .361". This is what gets me into trouble when I ask myself "What if", I go either from Hero to Zero or Zero to Hero.

  9. #9
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sand Coulee, Montana
    Posts
    251
    Doc, they drop at .360 so that is simply not an option.

    I was back at the range today and posted these results: http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...eadly-medicine

  10. #10
    Boolit Master
    Doc Highwall's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ct
    Posts
    4,615
    Have you looked at the stickies about lapping a mould? Taking off .0005" per side = .001" should be easy and also have the benefit of dropping the bullets from the cavities with less work.

  11. #11
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sand Coulee, Montana
    Posts
    251
    Doc, I'm thinking that this load will work just fine

  12. #12
    Boolit Buddy Clinebo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    St.Regis, MT
    Posts
    133
    Thanks for posting! I checked out that target. Found the shooting drill that goes with it. I'm a gonna give 'er a whirl. Cast a bunch of 230gr .45 acp and they need testing. Think I'll torture me sum dots!
    NRA Life Member
    NAHC Life Member



    And when the Persian said their arrows would "block out the sun" The Spartans said "Then we will have our battle in the shade!"

  13. #13
    Boolit Master
    TheGrimReaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Fayetteville,TN
    Posts
    913
    Quote Originally Posted by John Allen View Post
    it is amazing what .001 can make.
    That is what I was thinking too.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master sthwestvictoria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    south west victoria, australia
    Posts
    783
    This is direct comparison, I was suprised the difference was not more marked.
    Winchester 1894, Williams sights, 50metres, 150grain Lee FP, GC, pan lube, 19.0grains AR2206H (H4895), CCI primer.
    Apart from sizing, loads the same. Elevation was set lower for the right hand shoot, on different day.
    Left to right is size .309, .311, .311 (I put in two of those to convince you the high shoot on the middle is just a flyer):
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SizingComparison30march2013.jpg 
Views:	188 
Size:	22.1 KB 
ID:	65868
    the .309 group is 2 7/8", the middle 1 1/2" (discounting uppermost flyer) and right 1 1/8" (only 4 shots fired)
    ars longa, vita brevis

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check