RepackboxLoad DataReloading EverythingLee Precision
Titan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersSnyders Jerky
Inline Fabrication RotoMetals2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 48

Thread: CAR or mid length AR

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ARIZONA!
    Posts
    587
    Still doesn't change the fact it could be stamped "purple" and the ATF still calls it a rifle.

    the ATF has no legal description or definition of "carbine" as Mike insinuated to above.

    Even a Transferrable is classed as a rifle, on the 4473 form, when it's clearly on the NFA list and Class 3 taxable.

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,099
    Here's an AR15 pistol:



    Do you see any way to hold it other then as a pistol? No
    To further complicate things the ATF says putting any rifle holding device on it, such as stock or forearm then constitutes it as a short barreled rifle. Of course the military would call that a carbine.

    If it was a pistol the lower will be stamped that way. If it was a rifle the lower will be stamped that way. What are you not understanding.....they do mark them they don't have to color them.

  3. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ARIZONA!
    Posts
    587
    I think you just cleared that up for yourself.

    3 types of firearms to be recorded on a 4473.
    Long gun
    Pistol
    Other.

    No carbine found.

    Ergo, Carbine is not an accepted definition of a firearm in the eyes of the ATF.

    It's a pistol, Long gun or Other.


    I'd have my rear in a sling next audit I put "carbine" on my side of a 4473.

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,099
    That's correct about the ATF and it's for record keeping. It's not in the eyes of the Army. So I reckon if you're in the Army and your superior tells you to go get a carbine and bring it back to him that you would pick up a rifle, right?

    We can take up a petition and request that ATF that we want them to rewrite the 4473 that we want a specific description of or firearms arms on there...such as.....Model 94 Winchester Carbine with 20 inche barrel, Model 94 Winchester Carbien with 16 inch barrel, Model 94 Winchester Rife with 24 inch barrel, Model 94 Winchester Rife with 26 inch barrel. I'm sure they will oblige us.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ARIZONA!
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by StarMetal View Post
    That's correct about the ATF and it's for record keeping. It's not in the eyes of the Army. So I reckon if you're in the Army and your superior tells you to go get a carbine and bring it back to him that you would pick up a rifle, right?

    We can take up a petition and request that ATF that we want them to rewrite the 4473 that we want a specific description of or firearms arms on there...such as.....Model 94 Winchester Carbine with 20 inche barrel, Model 94 Winchester Carbien with 16 inch barrel, Model 94 Winchester Rife with 24 inch barrel, Model 94 Winchester Rife with 26 inch barrel. I'm sure they will oblige us.
    Mike didn't say anything about the Eyes of the army, just the Eyes of the BATFE.

    I know common definition of a carbine is a barrel sub 20". Matters not if it was based on a longer platform.

    an AK is a Carbine.
    An SKS is a rifle.
    An AR platform can be both, depending on barrel length.



    ATF still says all of those are "Long guns"(assuming AR has a provision for mounting a buttstock, if not, that AR is a pistol)

  6. #26
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    aurora,co
    Posts
    4,320
    Quote Originally Posted by Storydude View Post
    Please show me where BATFE makes a distinction between pistol, shotgun, rifle and CARBINE.


    Last time I looked in my Big Blue book, there were 3 classes of firearm.
    Pistol
    Long gun
    Other.

    Pistol is no buttstock, and marked as such.

    Long gun is rifle/shotgun in ANY length beyond 16" for centerfire and 18" for shotgun.

    Other is a bare receiver, NOT made into a firearm as of yet.

    no Carbine designation found.
    sorry, i did not see the spot where i said batf defined a carbine.......
    only accurate rifles are interesting

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ARIZONA!
    Posts
    587
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...9&postcount=16
    First line in this post.

    "You are not the ATF"

    ATF makes no definition of Carbine, so what he calls it is immaterial to what it's defined as.

  8. #28
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    aurora,co
    Posts
    4,320
    Quote Originally Posted by Storydude View Post
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...9&postcount=16
    First line in this post.

    "You are not the ATF"

    ATF makes no definition of Carbine, so what he calls it is immaterial to what it's defined as.
    another person that cannot stay in context........

    lets look again
    we are talking about carbines and rifles....
    the respondents says something is a pistol...an out of context answer to the subject, and now you claim i said.....
    i said he was not the batf...thats all and WENT BACK TO THE SUBJECT...RIFLES AND CARBINES.
    i clearly stated that it was a rifle, but the carbine version.

    THE SUBJECT is one mans aged opinion that only long bbls are rifles and all else is a carbine, thus the m16a2 is a carbine by him, but not by the army, the air force, the navy , the coast guard and the marines, and the nearly everyone else in this modern day.

    it is a moving definiton...he has not moced with the times ,plain and simple.

    mike in co
    only accurate rifles are interesting

  9. #29
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    aurora,co
    Posts
    4,320
    Quote Originally Posted by Storydude View Post
    Still doesn't change the fact it could be stamped "purple" and the ATF still calls it a rifle.

    the ATF has no legal description or definition of "carbine" as Mike insinuated to above.

    Even a Transferrable is classed as a rifle, on the 4473 form, when it's clearly on the NFA list and Class 3 taxable.
    so i should thank you for proving the other guy wrong...there are NO CARBINES....
    ARE YOU WILLING TO PUT YOUR BUTT ON THE LINE AND CLAIM THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CARBINE........?????
    ( or would you rather get back in context and on subject, is the m16a2 a rifle or a carbine ?)


    YOU ARE FUNNY
    again i suggest you stay on topic IN CONTEXT
    only accurate rifles are interesting

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ARIZONA!
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by mike in co View Post
    so i should thank you for proving the other guy wrong...there are NO CARBINES....
    ARE YOU WILLING TO PUT YOUR BUTT ON THE LINE AND CLAIM THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CARBINE........?????
    ( or would you rather get back in context and on subject, is the m16a2 a rifle or a carbine ?)


    YOU ARE FUNNY
    again i suggest you stay on topic IN CONTEXT
    According to the ATF, there IS no such thing as a Carbine.

    It's Long gun, Pistol or Other.

    Are you suggesting I call in a 4473 and say "carbine" when asked what type of firearm it is?

    I already know what that'll tell me.

    "that is not a valid answer. Please repeat firearm type"


    An M16A2 is a rifle. M4 is a "carbine LENGTH" rifle.

    Common vernacular aside, in my business, if the ATF says it's something, that's what it is. Regardless of what the common name for it is.

  11. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,099
    Anything that isn't a pistol or shotgun is a long gun. Carbine is a subcategory of a long gun. Maybe the ATF should change it to only require gun? After all they have more details on it in other blocks and the serial # so they very well know what it is.

  12. #32
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    4,635
    According to the ATF, there IS no such thing as a Carbine.

    It's Long gun, Pistol or Other.
    Does the ATF actually say this? Or is it simply a matter of their not making a distinction between rifles and carbines?
    The AFT is regulatory, not the end all and be all in defining firearms nomenclature.

    Pre to early 20th century a rifle with barrel as long as 22 inches would be a carbine. In France the term Carabin meant any handy rifle regardless of length, a sporting rifle as long as a Pennsylvania rifle would still be a carabin as opposed to the musket and musketoon which later was more nearly carbine length.
    The Gendarme Carbine was any short rifle that was used as a easier to hit with substitute for the handgun. That definition is the one applied to our US M1 .30 Carbine.
    The British considered SMGs to be "Machine Carbines".

    The major user of the M4 Carbine is the US military so their terminology trumps all in that case.
    The M16 Rifle is by civilian sporter terminology a short rifle, 20-22 inch. Before 1903 and for some time afterwards rifles with barrels shorter than 26 inches would be considered as "Short Rifles". Classic example is the Short Magazine Lee Enfield, with short denoting barrel and overall length compared to the standard Lee Enfield. British publications often labeled the 1903 Springfield as a Short Rifle as well, though both are now well within the modern definition of a full length rifle.

    PS
    The shorten tubes of the M4 carbine are responsible for greatly reduced stopping power and wounding effects compared to the M16. This has been the subject of numerous studies run by the military. Its a fact not in doubt.
    The shorter barrels can cut up to 500 fps off the striking velocity at any range the M4 is used.

    I like the handy qualities of the short 16 inch CAR Sporter, I've had the pleasure of firing a prime Colt manufactured example of this little carbine years ago. But its penetration is laughable and theres no wind bucking ability to speak of.
    Carbines of this class are more deadly than a 9mm SMG but a long way from being a good substitute for a battle rifle.


    A 5.56 cartridge with bullet and powders re-engineered practically from the ground up specifically for the 14 inch barrel might allow better efficiency from the M4, and those who own these SBR or AR pistols and handload for them should make the results known.
    Last edited by Multigunner; 06-30-2010 at 04:17 AM. Reason: correcting typo

  13. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ARIZONA!
    Posts
    587
    Quote Originally Posted by StarMetal View Post
    Anything that isn't a pistol or shotgun is a long gun. Carbine is a subcategory of a long gun. Maybe the ATF should change it to only require gun? After all they have more details on it in other blocks and the serial # so they very well know what it is.
    I feel they should go to pre 68 rules, but they don't listen to me.

  14. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,099
    Quote Originally Posted by Storydude View Post
    I feel they should go to pre 68 rules, but they don't listen to me.
    Folding up the ATF would be a good idea. Look at the money the government would save.

  15. #35
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    aurora,co
    Posts
    4,320
    Quote Originally Posted by Storydude View Post
    According to the ATF, there IS no such thing as a Carbine.

    It's Long gun, Pistol or Other.

    Are you suggesting I call in a 4473 and say "carbine" when asked what type of firearm it is?

    I already know what that'll tell me.

    "that is not a valid answer. Please repeat firearm type"


    An M16A2 is a rifle. M4 is a "carbine LENGTH" rifle.

    Common vernacular aside, in my business, if the ATF says it's something, that's what it is. Regardless of what the common name for it is.
    well as long as you are going to stayOFF TOPIC... DUH

    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE ATF....

    WAKE UP
    you are in the past like the other guy.

    again , back on topic, its about his definition of rifle and carbine,....not the BATF..

    READ MY LIPS , it is not about the batf...that only came up when he went OFF TOPIC.
    THE TOPIC IS """" what is a carbine, what is a rifle...as refers to the military m16 with a 20" bbl...that would be an m16a2"""""""."
    end of subject
    notice no reference to any batf.......

    and thank gawd...you answered that very question:

    "An M16A2 is a rifle. M4 is a "carbine LENGTH" rifle."

    its over....you said it...thanks
    mike in co
    only accurate rifles are interesting

  16. #36
    Boolit Master GabbyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    3,870
    Mike the topic is what the OP posted. He was looking to chose between a CAR-16” and a mid length. Mid lengths have 16 or 18 inch barrels. I simply tried to point out that a 20” barrel is plenty short and is in fact a carbine length rifle already. Then I mentioned if you get a 20" with no flash hider it's approximately as short as an 18" with attatchment. All on topic as far as I can tell. I seriously do not care what the Army labels M16's as. We are after all taking about a bunch of politicians and in the case of the AR-15 the Wiz Kids. Before that salesman called the AR whatever they thought would make the sale of Stoner's new thing. Salesmen do not define mechanics any more that Rolling Stones Reporters decide who is a good General.

    A 20” barrel is a carbine length barrel. An 11 ½ inch M4 barrel is a pistol length barrel. You may have an argument point as to weather a 14.5” is a carbine or pistol length as the line is blurred. There has never been an M16 battle rifle issued. I don't care what they call it. I like my AR's very much but they are not battle rifles. They are carbines. Perhaps the best carbine ever made. No amount of BS will change the facat that no 5.56mm is a battle rifle. An AK 47 is also not a battle rifle. Please do not retread how I'm not keeping up with the times. BS is BS. I do not care how many years it goes on for.

    Also I stated quite clear the reason I loath shorty M16's is my hearing loss tinnitis condition. In addition to hearing 48 db ring all the time it makes one more sensitive to the muzzle blast. Again I do not think it's from my shooting sport but rather factory work. Sensitivity to muzzle blast is not psychological it's a physical thing. It actually hurts a tiny bit. Over and over. When one of the LEO's shows up at the range and there are twelve benches but they set up next to you since they are sociable nice guys looking to have a good time. It's hard since I like to talk myself and like them but can't stand the issue blasters they show up with. So I just tough it out. Again the battery powered head phones are great items. But just like shooting prairie dogs all day you are beat to a pulp after an afternoon of that M4 blast. It's kind of like a drug with side effects. Supposedly there are benefits but do they out weigh the side effects. When I read a post from a man trying to decide what length AR barrel to shoot it's my opinion he should go with a full 20”. I've stated reasons why I have that opinion.

  17. #37
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    4,635
    The assault Rifle concept certainly muddied the waters.
    Its like the Karabiner 98a being a Carbine while the identical length Kar 98 is a battle rifle.
    The concept of what makes a rifle is in flux. OAL went out the window with the first Bull Pup conversions of the Lee Enfield and Springfield 1903 rifles. Now some full length barreled rifles are no longer than some pistol carbines.

  18. #38
    Boolit Master


    Ickisrulz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Shawnee, OK
    Posts
    2,950
    For anyone considering building or buying an AR, I would suggest research at
    m4carbine.net

    The guys who frequent there run their guns hard and eat sleep and breath the AR platform. There's lots and lots of good information.

  19. #39
    Boolit Master GabbyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    3,870
    assault rifle would be a good description of an M16. Term is so loaded down with social baggage I shrink from using it.

    30 caliber US M1 Carbine has an 18” barrel. M1 30-06 Battle Rifle it worked next to had a 24" barrel. US Army rejected a shorter barrel version due to muzzle balst. Springfield Armory marketed a Tanker M1 with short barrel back around the 1980's but it was never an issued rifle. Back then the Army had more sense that that.

  20. #40
    Boolit Master

    Moonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Thomasville North Carolina
    Posts
    4,695
    Ok, not to butt in but the original topic was about the position of the gas port, NOT about length of the barrel.

    Carbine length might be better for shooting boolits (higher pressure, more dwell time with fast pistol powders) but mid-length will be easier on the gun and shooter due to reduced bcg velocity from lower pressure/dwell time at the port.

    Guys come on, the fighting is really not necessary.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check