RotoMetals2RepackboxSnyders JerkyTitan Reloading
Reloading EverythingWidenersLee PrecisionInline Fabrication
MidSouth Shooters Supply Load Data
Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 257

Thread: Testing hardness with pencils

  1. #121
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Boynton Beach
    Posts
    33
    Great thread, love the tips. Would of never thought of this.

  2. #122
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4
    Update to my post of 12/29/2012

    I found that mixing about 9 lbs of recovered lead with 5.4lbs of linotype and 0.4 lbs tin gave bullets in the range of 2B to B for a "doesn't scratch" test. Used these in 45ACP loads and these didn't lead the barrels at all, while the slightly harder (B to HB) mix above did slightly, using the same powder/wt, etc. I also re-tested some of the recovered lead ingots and found that a 3B pencil didn't scratch. So I guess you can get a range of results with this method.

  3. #123
    Boolit Buddy Kull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    334
    I used this method, as described my Molly and others, to test various alloys I got from Rotometals.

    Rotometals Pure Lead - 6B, actually softer than 6B like someone else reported.
    Rotometals 20/1 - 3B, as expected.
    Rotometals Antimony Lead - 3B, same as 20/1.
    Rotometals Hardball - HB, as expected.

    Some Linotype pieces I just got from a fellow member and cast in to three pound ingots - F, for what it's worth.

    The 20/1 vs Antimony Lead test to me shows it's not a test that can differentiate between 10 and 13 BHN, but it sure can narrow you down to one of four hardness levels. Super soft, soft, medium, and hard......now I want to watch Formula One. Pretty good method all things considered, can't beat it for 10 bucks.

  4. #124
    Boolit Bub ken s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    33
    one last thought. I'm a GIA Gemologist. diamonds etc. the old 'test a diamond if it scratches glass' well...on a MO's scale for gem hardness, diamond is a 10 and glass is a one. now..diamond, being harder WILL scratch glass, but so will GLASS being the same hardness.
    basically, anything harder than the glass including glass will scratch it. so the 'test' is a bust.
    pure lead will scratch pure lead, and so will anything harder.
    so, if you use pure lead, and it scratches the lead you're testing, that should be pure lead...

  5. #125
    Boolit Mold yamavira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    NE England
    Posts
    1
    Any chance of a picture of the ideal point for a test pencil !!.

  6. #126
    Boolit Buddy Kull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by yamavira View Post
    Any chance of a picture of the ideal point for a test pencil !!.
    No point. Just cut off the core at a 90 degree angle. Like you would cut off a piece of pipe.

  7. #127
    Boolit Grand Master



    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Southwestern Ohio
    Posts
    8,456
    Molly was my personal friend. He described the test to me exactly like Kull stated above. Just carefully remove the wood from around the end of a pencil of the appropriate hardness. Then, make certain that the end is right angles to the shank (carefully use a piece of abrasive paper, if necessary). It is important that the edge be sharp...

    FWIW
    Dale53

  8. #128
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    104
    Dunno how I missed this thread but I'm glad I found it. Went out after work and snagged a set of pencils. The two commercial boolits I had agreed with the manufacturers claim at 16 BHN (Dardas) and 20 BHN (lasercast). My alloy showed I was correct thinking it was a tad soft at 10 BHN.
    Thanks to y'all clever folks I can stop guessing!

  9. #129
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    712
    picked some up on ebay for 12 bucks delivered.
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/350744940919...84.m1439.l2649

  10. #130
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    1,286
    Got a set of art (drawing) pencils. At PaT Catan's for five dollars.

    Pure lead ; tested at 4B , 5B and 6B too soft.
    Wheel weights; tested at H . Range Lead HB just a little softer then WW.

    This pure lead; is 100 % pure was given to me years ago we were leading cabinets for medical field so had to be pure.

    Was very easy to tell the difference in just the way if feels, with the pencil core going over the different metal.

  11. #131
    Boolit Buddy TenTea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    406
    Thanks to all who posted here, as this thread has been an exceedingly helpful and interesting read.

    I will begin Staedtler testing forthwith!
    A bear, however hard he tries, grows tubby without exercise.

  12. #132
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    23
    very useful information here. Thanks to everyone.

  13. #133
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    365
    I read several time concerns from people who haven't tried this method about the effect of pressure and method on repeatability.

    What I've observed in doing this is that as I work down in pencil hardness each pencil will scratch the test alloy just as easily as the last pencil did, till I reach the pencil that won't. Then no matter how much pressure or what angle I hold it at, it simply won't gouge the alloy. The pencil crumbles when you attempt to scratch alloy that's harder than the pencil is.

    I've found it's easiest to simply use a pencil sharpener to get a sharp point on the pencil, then I try to gouge it into the surface at an angle, roughly 45 degrees. If it gouges, it gouges, if it doesn't, it crumbles and slides. Simple, and repeatable.

    My results coincide with what others using other pencil methods have posted.

    I tested some pure lead and found it to be softer than 8B.

    Some stick-on WW ingots tested at 5B.

    Clip-on WW ingots tested at HB

    Water dropped clip-on WW bullets with 2% tin tested at 2H.

    I got my pencils at Wal-mart, they were about $7 if I recall. They have the ASTM emblem on the back.

  14. #134
    Boolit Master
    JWFilips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northeastern part of Penn's Woods near Slocum Hollow.
    Posts
    1,920
    I would also like to note:
    I have tried a number of different quality ( or not ) pencils sets & it appears that Staedtler is the more accurate for the purpose.
    I tried others which gave lower readings and also higher readings with known samples of lead & lead alloy.
    The Staedtler's seem to be right on ( & I feel can be trusted) to get you very close to the hardness you are testing.

    Unfortunately I tried to save a buck in the begining and bought the lower price sets but noticed they didn't match what my borrowed Staedtlers were showing. I even went so far as to buy a more expensive brand because the art store was out of Staedtlers They too didn't get me as close Glad I finally got the true testing set. Save yourself some aggravation
    " Associate with men of good quality, if you esteem your own reputation: for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " George Washington

  15. #135
    Boolit Master 40-82 hiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by chasw View Post
    Thanks, Molly and Rob. This is useful information. As I begin to gather data from using my new pencil set on samples from my store of boolit alloys, I am beginning to map out a scale of sorts - call it the Staedtler Scale, after the makers of these fine artist's pencils. So long as one sticks to that widely available brand of pencils and uses the correct technique, results will be similar. Molly observed spacing of about 1-3/4 BHN between some of the grades, perhaps at the softer end of the scale. Here's what I've gathered so far:

    6B = Pure lead, about 5 BHN
    5B
    4B
    3B = 1in20 tin/lead alloy, age softened, about 10 BHN
    2B
    B
    HB = Lyman no 2 alloy, about 15 BHN
    H = Linotype, supposedly about 22 BHN, but that seems high
    2H
    3H
    4H

    I offer this cheap but effective method of testing relative hardness, not particularly to convert pencil numbers to Brinell numbers, but rather as an alternate scale for boolit casters, with reference points to known alloys. If I pick up some scrap lead, or buy alloy from a smelter, I can quickly find out where it lies, relative to those other alloys. For example, my small stock of LaserCast brand commercial lead projectiles tested HB. I never had any luck with them, I've been saving them for the furnace, now I know approximately where they fit in as feedstock.

    The bullets I cast from Lyman no 2 do very well in my rifles, with no leading at all. But methinks that alloy is too hard to maintain a tight seal in my revolver loads. So I'll try some of the 1in20 alloy, maybe with some Lino mixed in to boost it up into the 2B range. - CW
    You are correct in recommending that brand of pencils ONLY to go with your research. Pencil manufacturers readily admit there is no industry standard for pencil hardness. They all use the same relative hardness designation, but they really only mean that one is harder or softer than another along an understandable scale. An "H" pencil from one manufacturer is not the same as from another, unless purely by chance. I ran into this problem in another venue a couple of years ago, and it caused me much frustration until I came upon this information.

    Thanks for the research.

  16. #136
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    14
    I have read the entire thread and have been impressed!

    I was at my local wally and found a set of pencils for $5 bucks. I tried them out on my WW lead and my pure lead and my mystery lead.

    My WW lead came out to a HB, my pure lead came out to a 8B/6B, and the mystery lead came to B. This seems to be consistent to what has been reported so far.

    My WW lead came from a 5 gallon bucket of weights I have collected for years so I know it came from WW. The pure lead came from a 40's ish 20kg calibration weight I found in the trash, lastly the mystery lead came from a race car friend of my that said it was old car weights.

    My question is.. Do these values make sense to what you have all seen, and can anyone make sense of what old car racing weights are?

    Thanks to everyone here!! I have come here many times to get advise as I am new to casting. This is a great place and many thanks to the people that share their experience and information.

  17. #137
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,581
    Think I finally got my hardness/toughness tester figured out. Wish I could use a torque wrench for measurement, but!! Cut an RCBS deprimer pin so it is 0.020" out from the holder. Screw it back into the sizer die I don't use anymore. Put a CB on the press and measure the force to push the pin all the way into the CB, the holder stops so I only go in 0.020". Use a fish scale to measure the force on the handle. Won't calibrate to BHN but will give a relative reference for my alloys and heat treating effects. So far, ~ 20-25 #. I just watch the scale and see what the # is just before it pops. Don't have to file or polish anything, no magnifying glass.
    Edit: Tried a different approach, used a 9mm case in the 9mm die, adjusted the standard pin down 0.020". Tried several CBs, numbers came out the same. Difference in alloy is just different batches.
    alloy #1
    30-30 RD 180 23#
    40SW A 165 22#
    30-30 RD 180 14# Hi-Tek coated, HT 1 hr @ 250F

    alloy #2
    308 A 165 32# powder coated, HT 30 min @ 450F

    Scale is a $20 berkley digital, 50# max. Press is a Lee classic cast.
    Now I can validate different batches & casts. I can get a lot of lead for the >$100 for a tester.
    Last edited by popper; 08-15-2013 at 09:48 AM. Reason: added data
    Whatever!

  18. #138
    Boolit Buddy GunFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    164
    Air cooled ingots from lead pipe cut with 3B.

    Bullets I got severe leading with tested to B
    In the market for a multicavity Mi-Hec 9mm HP mold.

    I presently cast for .380 ACP, 9mm, .38/.357, 30 cal and .45 and 12 Ga slug.
    I am particularly grateful for the help I have gotten from members Red333 and MSRdiver, and OLD Para (who made a crazy mold on my design!!!!!) as well as excellent guides by Recluse for his ideal lube process. I have been experimenting with poly coating too.

    PM me if you know of a very cheap source of birdshot, or an efficient way to make #4 Buck.

  19. #139
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,581
    First letter is for hardness, second is for blackness. I've used the Pentel version as you don't have to cut anything.
    Whatever!

  20. #140
    Vendor Sponsor

    DougGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    just above Raleigh North Carolina
    Posts
    7,403
    I too enjoyed this thread and invested in the Mars Staedtler Lumograph set, about $12 at Staples. I was looking at deciding on two different hardness levels for hunting boolits.

    The boolit is dropped from the Lee C430-310-RF mold, it is their wide flat nose gas check design in .44 caliber. I use the softer one for deer, bear, thin skinned animals and I run it out of the muzzle about 1100f/s or so. The slightly harder alloy I push harder, 1300f/s and it is used for pigs.

    One alloy is 50/50 coww and pure lead, with 2% tin added, it is the softer one that I can scratch with a thumbnail, it is a 3B, or BHN 10.

    The other alloy is straight acww, can't scratch it with a thumbnail, it is a B, or BHN 14.

    I didn't -really- need two specifically different alloys, could have done all my hunting with the acww, it was just something that interested me at the time, and I found the pencils a great aid in this effort.

Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check