Very interesting post. See I do recover too. I lose a lot to expansion and break up, but some eventually are worth while to view. And I don't see what you see.
Why? Well you wonder why I consider wear? Let me give you an example.
Two 44 loads in two guns with a 240 grain bullet: In one gun bullet travel until impact with the rifling is roughly .750". (My S&W) This includes the cone length. The second gun has only a slightly elongated cone that alters this distance to 1.250". (My Redhawk)
(Eye opening how just slight wear on the cone depth and angle on the rifling adds up quick) What does this do to two impact velocities of the two loads in each gun?
7gr BE
Velocity at impact in the 3/4 gun, 500 fps. The 1.25 gun, 632fps.
24 gr of 296
Velocity in the 3/4" gun, 697 fps. The 1.25 gun 900 fps.
So from looking at this the Redhawk with the slight wear needs almost as hard a bullet for the light BE load as the S&W does with the full power 296 load.
Now visualize increasing bullet weight which increases inertia to resist rotation?
So you asked, "If all that length will not stop skid to the base, what would you do?"
My answer would be to shorten the distance and set the barrel back. Now imagine how low the velocity would be if you only had .300 jump like my line bore 44 without a cone.
7 gr of BE: 290fps
24 gr 296: 395fps
Very little difference between the max and pipsqueak load that can shoot 20-1. Think I can shoot 20-1 with a check with the 296?
Which gun do you think needs the harder bullet to prevent stripping?
Then does every gun need that hard of a bullet? And that is why wear is important for lead. So says Professor Gun.