Load DataWidenersRepackboxInline Fabrication
RotoMetals2Reloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters SupplyTitan Reloading
Lee Precision
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 45

Thread: 2400; Hercules vs Alliant

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,304

    2400; Hercules vs Alliant

    2400; Hercules vs Alliant

    Sometime back I stated I would conduct a pressure test comparing the old Hercules 2400 with the newer Alliant 2400. Alliant, since taking over manufacture of the Hercules powders, says they have not changed the formula of 2400 yet most reloading manuals show a decline of around 1 gr with maximum loads. The question of whether or not there is a difference between old Hercules 2400 and Alliant 2400 most often comes up with the .44 magnum, specifically with 429421 and the classic “Keith” load of 22 gr under that bullet. Lyman’s Cast Bullet Manual lists a maximum load at 23.4 gr of 2400 with the 429421 cast bullet, their “Keith” bullet. Some say 21 grains is the max with the newer Alliant 2400 and others still shoot 22 gr of the newer Alliant 2400 the same as they did with Hercules 2400. This begs the question; is there a difference between the older Hercules 2400 and the newer Alliant 2400? This test will focus on the pressure difference between the two powders if any. Though I will mention accuracy in a couple places let us remember we are concerned about pressure here and what is a “safe” load, not what is an accurate load.

    As an after thought I also decided to throw in a test string using magnum large pistol primers to test whether there is an internal ballistic difference between their use and the normal use of a standard large pistol primer in the 44 magnum with the classic “Keith” load.

    I have conducted this because I have the equipment not only to measure the velocity but also the psi of many cartridges, the 44 magnum included. I also decided to include a test of a popular load using 2400 with a 160 grain cast bullet in the 30-30.

    I conducted the test yesterday, the 7th of January 2010. The test was conducted at Tacoma Rifle and Revolver Club on the main range. There are very solid cement benches there and I use the same bench when conducting pressure tests with the screens, equipment set up in the same position and locations. The test instrument is the M43 Personal Ballistics Laboratory made by Oehler Research. The test firearm was the Thompson Center Contender; a 8.4” barrel for the .44 magnum and a 21” barrel for the 30-30. The 44 magnum barrel has a 1.5X Bushnell scope mounted on it and the 30-30 barrel has a Weaver K4. The 30-30 barrel is in carbine form with a Brown thumbhole rear stock.

    It took a while to locate an old can of Hercules 2400 but a forum member, Shuz, came across with one. He lives in Spokane so it took some coordination to get it transported to me on the other side of the state. Many thanks should be given to Shuz and his daughter who made this test possible.

    The cardboard cylindrical “can” of Hercules 2400 was unopened and I cut the plastic end off the little plastic spout. The bottom of the can was marked “Shift 1”, 02400 066, 12693. The plastic “can” of Alliant 2400 has a lot # of CE0519 on it and was purchased last year before the rush.

    The 44 magnum bullets were cast of WWs+2% tin in a RCBS 44-250-K double cavity mould. Bullets were inspected for complete fill out and other defects but other than that were non selected. The bullets fully dressed weighed 254 grains. The bullet lube used was Javelina and bullets were sized .430 in a Lyman 450. Cases were new, unfired, Winchester WW Super manufacture. Primers were Federal 150s and CCI 350s. Cases were sized and loaded in RCBS dies. A heavy roll crimp was applied in the bullets crimp groove as a separate step. AOL was 1.705”. Powder charges were weighed on a Redding scale.

    The 30-30 bullets were cast of the same alloy in a Lyman 311466 double cavity mould. The bullets were visually inspected only for defects. The Hornady gas checks were pre seated then the bullets were sized and lubed with Javelina in a Lyman 450 with a .314 H die. The bullets were then pushed through a Lee .311 sizer. The fully dressed bullets weighed right at 160 gr. The .311 sized bullets when loaded in the FC 30-30 cases gave a very tight slip fit in the chambers neck. Cases were full length sized in an RCBS X-die die with a Lyman .31 M-die used to expand the case mouth and a 7mm seating die used to seat the over diameter bullets. Primers were Winchester WLRs. The bullets were seated with the front diving band just off the lands putting the GC right at the base of the case neck. AOL was 2.45”.

    Test; the test strings for the 44 magnum consisted of 10 shots each for 20.5, 21, 21.5 and 22 gr of both Hercules and Alliant 2400. At 21 gr I also fired the additional test string of 10 shots using the CCI LP magnum primer. The target for the 44 magnum was at 50 yards. The start screen was 16 feet from the muzzle. The 30-30 test strings were also of 10 shots each and consisted of 16 gr of each of the 2400s. The target for the 30-30 test was at 100 yards. The start screen for the 30-30 test was 15 feet from the muzzle.

    The temperature during the test range from 39 to 43 F. There was no wind to speak of. As is my usual practice when I set up the M43 I fired a 5 shot test string with a specific .308W rifle and one lot of M118SB as “reference ammunition” to ensure the M43 set up is good. This same specific rifle is used with a clean bore and the same lot of very uniform ammunition each time I set up the M43 for a test. In this case the reference ammunition test velocity and psi data readings were well with in norm for the 39 F temperature. All was good with the M43 set up so I conducted the test. At the conclusion of the 44 magnum test I cleaned the barrel and also ran 2 jacketed loads through it as a reference. This was a factory load and another standard load with a jacketed bullet. The ballistic information on these is also included for reference. Added: With regards to the seemingly low psi; this test was conducted at 39 -43 F. A check of previous test with this same bullets and same lot of 22 gr of Alliant conducted when the temperature was in the high 70s revealed an increase of 5,000 psi over what was obtained in this test. Obviously the ambiant temperature is a variable that must be considered.

    Data and remarks; I will list the data for each charge as; H2400 (Hercules 2400) or A2400 (Alliant 2400) /velocity (adjusted to muzzle)/SD (Standard Deviation)/ ES (Extreme Spread) and under that will be the MAP (Mean Average Pressure)/SD/ES. All velocities, SDs and ES are in feet per second. All MAPs, SD and ES are in psi(M43). Keep in mind that pressure data and velocity data are not absolutes. There are expected variations between test strings of the same lot of ammunition and also between lots of components, especially powders. Alliant, of course, does not reveal the variation between lots of any powder. I do know that it was acceptable for a +/- 5% variation (10% variation possible) between different lots of IMR 4895. This is why some lots shoot ‘faster” or “slower” than other lots of the same powder. Also keep in mind that factory published psi and SAAMI psi are maximum allowable average pressures for specific cartridges. That does not mean every one of those cartridges are loaded to that psi level. Quite the contrary most factory and arsenal ammunition are well below those published figures, a “fudge factor” if you will.

    The 44 magnum cartridge has a SAAMI MAP psi, using piezo-electric measurement, of 41,000 psi or 36,000 C.U.P. (Copper Unit Pressure). Also keep in mind that I am not using a SAAMI spec test barrel. I am using a production barrel with more than likely specs that are not at minimum like the SAAMI specs. Thus we can expect somewhat less velocity and attendant less pressure out of the Contender barrel than we would get with identical loads out of a SAAMI spec test barrel. For that very reason I would not load to the SAAMI max of 41,000 psi in this barrel. In my experience with the M43 and psi measurements in production barrels I would consider 35,000 psi(M43) to be a maximum load for the 44 magnum in a production barrel such as the Contender’s.

    20.5 gr
    H2400; 1365/17/56
    25,700/900/2,700

    A2400; 1425/13/41
    26,000/600/1,900

    [B]21 gr[/B]
    H2400; 1436/18/53
    28,900/1,100/3,100

    A2400; 1466/14/47
    27,200/600/2,200

    21 gr with CCI 350 magnum primers
    H2400; 1438/17/51
    27,100/1,000/3,000

    A2400; 1474/19/60
    27,300/1,100/3,200

    21.5 gr
    H2400; 1455/18/55
    26,500/900/2,400

    A2400; 1468/18/58
    27,000/800/3,000

    22 gr
    H2400; 1493/20/57
    27,000/700/2,000

    A2400; 1515/14/47
    27,900/700/2,400

    Magtech 44 magnum factory ammunition; 240 HHP, 17.2 gr flake powder
    1376/24/72
    25,100/1,700/6,100

    Hornady 240 gr XTP/24.5 gr H110, R-P cases, WLP primer
    1540/16/46
    31,200/1,500/4,700

    From the above data, with the exception of the 21 gr data, we see that the Alliant 2400 appears to be “hotter”. However, the difference is less than 2% which is probably well within acceptable lot to lot variation. The 21 gr load where the Hercules 2400 is “hotter” is even less that 2% variation. Note that the 21.5 gr load of Hercules 2400 has 2,400 less psi than the 21 gr load of Alliant 2400 but still has a slightly higher velocity….such are the variances and why there is an acceptable variance. It is also why the “fudge factor” is built in. Were all the loads of Alliant 2400 “hotter” than the Hercules 2400 we could safely say, at least from this test, that this lot of Alliant 2400 is “hotter” than this lot of Hercules 2400. However that is not the case. With this test it appears both powders fall within lot to variation of a specific powder.

    The Magtech factory ammunition is fairly indicative of current factory velocities and pressures. The Hornady XTP load is a popular load for that bullet and you can see the velocity and psi is up there. Lyman lists 23.4 gr of 2400 as a max load with their 429421 in the 3rd edition of their Cast Bullet Handbook. I can not disagree with that psi wise given the results of this test.

    As to accuracy I have found with PB’d cast bullets used loaded in revolver cartridges and shot in other Contenders, revolvers with 6”+ barrels and rifles that accuracy starts to go above 1400 – 1450 fps and so it was with this test. The 21.5 gr load of both Hercules and Alliant 2400 with the CCI magnum primers proved to be the most accurate load on target even though the standard Federal primer load had slightly better internal ballistics. A repeat of the test could very well reverse that as the difference between the two powders internally or accuracy wise wasn’t enough to consider remarkable. I would use either load in this Contender barrel for hunting.


    30-30
    The 30-30 test was rather straight forward with only one charge of each powder tested. I will list the data in the same format;

    16 gr
    H2400; 1861/19/53
    42,400/5,600/15,600

    A2400; 1873/11/41
    42,000/1,400/3,800

    Remarks; 2400 is reputed to be a fine powder for midrange cast bullet loads with a filler not being necessary. It also is supposed to be non-position sensitive. I will agree with that to the extent if heavy for caliber cast bullets are used such as 190 – 220 gr bullets. My experience of years ago with medium weight bullets was born out again by this test, 2400 is not an efficient powder for medium or light weight bullets and with such is, indeed, position sensitive. The first 3 shots were foulers and no effort was made to position the powder in the case. The ES was from 1688 fps to 1822 fps. That was unacceptable. I thus conducted the Hercules 2400 test by raising the muzzle about 45 -60 degrees before shooting to position the powder to the rear of the case. Even then ignition was not what I would call consistent with the Hercules. With the Alliant I raised the muzzle to 90 degrees before shooting and the ES of the psi improved dramatically. There were also pressure spikes both up and down when the bullet was about 2/3s down the barrel. The pressure spikes were not any where near the MAP pressures but it showed uneven ignition and burn of the powder. Note also that the Alliant 2400 gave a lower MAP than the Hercules 2400 even though the velocity was slightly higher. Even with the large psi ES of the Hercules 2400 the average pressure of the 2 powders is so close that they again, in the 30-30, fall well within lot to lot variation of a specific powder.

    Conclusion; Alliant says they didn’t change the formula for 2400 and you can’t prove by me otherwise. With cast bullets I shall to use 22 gr of Alliant 2400 under the 250 gr "Keith" style cast bullet in the 44 magnum as that load shoots very nicely in my Ruger 50th Anniversary BHFT at 1350 fps.

    Caveat; I did not conduct any test with Alliant 2400 and jacketed bullets of 240 grain weight and the results of my test are not to be inclusive of them. It is expected that the pressures would be higher but since I have not ran a test all I can say is stick with current published data when using jacketed bullets and either Hercules 2400 or Alliant 2400.


    Larry Gibson
    Last edited by Larry Gibson; 01-09-2010 at 04:05 PM. Reason: Spelling and grammer

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master



    cbrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kalifornia Escapee
    Posts
    8,034
    Larry, an informative well written report. A lot of work to get data like that, thanks for sharing.

    Rick
    "The people never give up their freedom . . . Except under some delusion." Edmund Burke

    "Let us remember that if we suffer tamely a lawless attack on our liberty, we encourage it." Samuel Adams

    NRA Benefactor Life Member
    CRPA Life Member

  3. #3
    Moderator Emeritus

    wiljen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,525
    May I post to Castpics?
    Reloading Data Project - (in retirement)
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/reloadersrfrnce/

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master



    cbrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Kalifornia Escapee
    Posts
    8,034
    Exactly what I was thinking . . . Larry, your permission to publish this at lasc.us ??

    Rick
    "The people never give up their freedom . . . Except under some delusion." Edmund Burke

    "Let us remember that if we suffer tamely a lawless attack on our liberty, we encourage it." Samuel Adams

    NRA Benefactor Life Member
    CRPA Life Member

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Florida
    Posts
    701
    Larry
    That is great info and a well written report! I was just reading some info on the difference between the new and old 2400, and wondering if anyone had actually run pressure tests. There is nothing like real world testing to get the real facts.

    Thanks
    Gary

  6. #6
    Boolit Master

    TCLouis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Middle TN
    Posts
    4,404
    Thank you for the time and effort it takes to sit something up like thans and conduct the test. I know when I go just to chronograph loads the range time increases significantly.

    I love it when someone does a real study, not the supposition of results that even I do.

    It still makes me wonder why Lyman used 4" barrel for the 357 and 44 Mag testing in the manual.

    I am assuming 10" 44 mag barrel and 30-30 is??
    Amendments
    The Second there to protect the First!

  7. #7
    Moderator Emeritus


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SW Montana
    Posts
    12,450
    Gents, When i moved this from Cast Boolits I only moved the first post. You may have to go there to get ahold of Larry.
    [The Montana Gianni] Front sight and squeeze

  8. #8
    Banned Bucks Owin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Northeast CA.
    Posts
    1,254
    Hey, thanks for the thread, it's a very good one! Keep them up! Don't know if this can be "extrapolated" (or even spelled! ha ha) but a couple weeks ago I fired a string of .45 LC using a 250 gr XTP over 21.0 grs of "old stock" Hercules 2400, WW cases, WLP primers. Velocity in my 7.5" NMBH was 1048, pressure seemed fairly mild....FWIW, Dennis

  9. #9
    Moderator Emeritus


    gon2shoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    1,170
    Good work, and thanks.
    grit yer teeth an pull the trigger

  10. #10
    Boolit Buddy Wireman134's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Manhattan, IL
    Posts
    167
    Not much difference, probably the same difference from lot to lot of current production. Thanks for the info.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Eastern South Dakota
    Posts
    3,662
    That's excellent work Larry, thank you.

    Next you should do a comparison between jacketed an real boolits.


    Cat
    Cogito, ergo armatum sum.

    (I think, therefore I'm armed.)

  12. #12
    Boolit Master Slow Elk 45/70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Clear, AK
    Posts
    1,289
    Thanks for your time and effort and sharing .
    Slow Elk 45/70

    Praise the Lord & Pass the Ammo

  13. #13
    Banned Bucks Owin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Northeast CA.
    Posts
    1,254

    Linebaugh's pressure vs velocity comparisons:

    In it's (and Elmer's) day, H2400 ruled supreme for top velocity. Not anymore IMO...VELOCITY AND PRESSURE COMPARISONS SHOWING THE SUPERIORITY OF H-110 AND W 296 OVER OTHER COMMONLY USED POWDERS IN THE .45 COLT. 7" TEST BBL.

    BULLET POWDER GRAINS VELOCITY CUP
    260 GR. LEAD SWC H-110 27 1459 FPS 30,600
    260 GR. LEAD SWC H-4227 26 1377 FPS 30,600
    260 GR. LEAD SWC # 2400 20.5 1294 FPS 29,800
    260 GR. LEAD SWC HS-6 16 1259 FPS 30,800
    260 GR. LEAD SWC UNIQUE 12 1199 FPS 30,000
    310 GR LEAD SWC H-l10 23 1330 FPS 30,000
    310 GR LEAD SWC H-4227 23 1176 FPS 29,400
    310 GR LEAD SWC # 2400 19 1172 FPS 29,400
    310 GR LEAD SWC HS-6 14 1119 FPS 30,400
    310 GR LEAD SWC UNIQUE 11 998 FPS 29,200


  14. #14
    Boolit Master



    ddixie884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Avery, Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    Thanks Larry, that is very well done, and informative.
    JMHO-YMMV
    dd884
    gary@2texastrucks.com
    Gary D. Peek

  15. #15
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Baltimore Md
    Posts
    12

    Smile 2400

    As I am new here I want to thank everyone for letting me join. I have been looking at this sight for a year now, and have gotten quite a few good pointers from it.

    Larry the work up with the 2400 was very good and right on in my Book. I have been reloading 2400 in 357 and 44 mag since 1975. cast bullets since 1979, and I will not use any other powder. When in the 90's I swiched over to the alliant powder and I saw no difference. I have had to drop my charge down to 19.5 in the 44 mag due to age,but they still shoot very well for this old man. I am still putting the meat on the table with it. GREAT SIGHT Little Jim

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,304
    Little Jim

    Welcome to the site and we know you will enjoy it here. I too understand the reason for the reduced load

    Larry Gibson

  17. #17
    Boolit Master nanuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    3,129
    the Generosity of folks on here to share their information to help others is truly a boon to anyone looking at shooting boolits.

    Thank You Larry Gibson.

  18. #18
    Banned - Posts Deleted Because He Edited Them With Vulgarity When He Could Not Get His Way
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    exiting the building
    Posts
    1,468
    After seeing the results some folks are having in a variety of cartridges, I decided to buy a jug. I was SHOCKED at how inexpensive it was compared to MANY other powders. I paid $100.99 plus tax!

  19. #19
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    505

    Exclamation I hope thats for 5 or more pounds

    Quote Originally Posted by excess650 View Post
    After seeing the results some folks are having in a variety of cartridges, I decided to buy a jug. I was SHOCKED at how inexpensive it was compared to MANY other powders. I paid $100.99 plus tax!
    I hope thats for 5 or more pounds!

  20. #20
    Boolit Man JLDickmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by Dthunter View Post
    I hope thats for 5 or more pounds!
    last I looked, that was the going rate for an 8 pounder..
    Never laugh at your wife's choices.
    You are one of them.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check