RepackboxLoad DataTitan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters Supply
WidenersLee PrecisionRotoMetals2Snyders Jerky
Inline Fabrication Reloading Everything
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Thread: I need some help interpreting my data.

  1. #21
    Boolit Grand Master Tatume's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    5,590
    Have you shot the loads for accuracy?

  2. #22
    Boolit Buddy 20:1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by Tatume View Post
    Have you shot the loads for accuracy?
    OP- If accuracy is your primary goal, then this would be the next step. What crimping die are you using, and have you tried a faster burning powder yet? I've always found better accuracy in .357 max loads with H110/296 with jacketed bullets rather than cast. There are other excellent powders out there. Also, I didn't notice if you're using magnum primers.

  3. #23
    Boolit Master ACC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Location
    San Antonio Texas
    Posts
    582
    Been shooting H110/W296 since most on this list were just children(Yes I am old) all I can say is crimp, crimp, crimp! It has to be uniform.

    No excuses! Crimp.

    ACC

  4. #24
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,390
    I've got 2 -1lb H-110 containers. Older jug has a steel cap and is from the mid 90's. Price tag is $15.50. Load data on the front has ,357 mag loads for 125gr JHP and 158gr JSP. It was not very accurate with 125's at silhouette so I went with another powder. Powder is still in good shape. Newer jug is less than 4 years old with a plastic cap. I paid $40 for it. Only 357 load is for a 180gr Nosler Partition. I load 410 shells with both jugs. It's tough on hull crimp folds but works great.

    I don't have data for your particular bullet but the RCBS cast bullet manual from 1986 that shows load data for their 158gr SWC that's in the neighborhood of your 686 velocities. I've also got a Contender load manual from 1997 with Hodgdon Load data for 158-160gr bullets that is right there with your 10" Contender. I used to load 180's with H-110 to hunt deer in the Contender back in the 80-90's.

  5. #25
    Boolit Grand Master fredj338's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    kalif.
    Posts
    7,245
    I didnt see it but I assume you used mag primers? H110 is not my fav magnum powder. Its basically a max effort loading for best results also doesnt play well at low air temps. I used to shoot HMSill with an 8" & had great results there, jacketed or lead, but for 357mag, I seem to get better results with 2400 & lead bullets.
    EVERY GOOD SHOOTER NEEDS TO BE A HANDLOADER.
    NRA Cert. Inst. Met. Reloading & Basic Pistol

  6. #26
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    186
    Maybe I missed it but did you measure what diameter your mold drops? What diameter did you size your bullets to? Cylinder throats .001 bigger than bore is perfect. Bullets sized about the same difference over throat diameter may tighten up velocity in your revolver if the cylinder throats are that uniform but I don’t pay much attention to it in my handguns. I have two Lee 158 molds. One is a tumble lube SWC that I load in .38’s. The other is a gas checked SWC. The gas checked SWC is the only one I load with H-110. CCI Magnum primers are used. My Blackhawk has throats .358-.3585. Bore slugs. .357. My mold drops at .360. I size them to .359. Powder charge is 15.3 grains H-110. Heavy roll crimp in the crimp groove.
    In my 686 I also load 15.3 grains of H-110. Everything about the 686 is a little tighter than the Blackhawk except accuracy with cast. The 686 slugs .3565. Cylinder throats are all spot on .357. I size to .358 for it. With both revolvers I let the cylinder throats minutely size the cast bullets. As luck would have it in both revolvers, they both wind up barely over bore size coming out of the cylinder. Both shoot pretty well but I have not been able to quite match the accuracy I get with a 158 XTP. Conversely I can not match the accuracy I get with a gas checked conventional lubed bullet if I powder coat.
    These are targets with the cast loads I worked up in my revolvers and a jacketed load for comparison.
    My jacketed load is 15.6 grains of H-110.(.3 gr more than my cast load)
    All groups are two handed slow fire @ 25 yards.

    This is a wheel full of gas checked 158 SWC in the 686 with H-110. Flattening the target on the table closed the holes up some but it grouped close to an inch.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	024D2C86-41D0-426B-A53D-B1D7B802B204.jpg 
Views:	4 
Size:	42.8 KB 
ID:	321771
    For comparison it does not match the accuracy of XTP’s pushed with H-110.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BE7AD8B2-0626-488B-83AD-23D85425B3D4.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	75.0 KB 
ID:	321772
    As you can see here the 686 does not match my Blackhawk with the SWC’s and H-110.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	87852C18-F160-4899-A850-E7AEA26D9B98.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	79.5 KB 
ID:	321773
    The only one of these I have chronographed is the gas checked SWC’s and H-110 in the 4 5/8” Blackhawk. Only shot one so extreme spread and SD remain unknown. The load is not blazing fast but works well enough on 100 yard silhouettes to satisfy my ability.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B9ADACB5-E694-4B8B-932F-65E7F6D99D17.jpg 
Views:	3 
Size:	46.9 KB 
ID:	321774
    I like H-110 in .357 Magnum.

  7. #27
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,406
    My lawn is quite fond of H110.
    I have danced with the Devil. She had excellent attorneys.

  8. #28
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    9,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Willie T View Post
    Maybe I missed it but did you measure what diameter your mold drops? What diameter did you size your bullets to? Cylinder throats .001 bigger than bore is perfect. Bullets sized about the same difference over throat diameter may tighten up velocity in your revolver if the cylinder throats are that uniform but I don’t pay much attention to it in my handguns. I have two Lee 158 molds. One is a tumble lube SWC that I load in .38’s. The other is a gas checked SWC. The gas checked SWC is the only one I load with H-110. CCI Magnum primers are used. My Blackhawk has throats .358-.3585. Bore slugs. .357. My mold drops at .360. I size them to .359. Powder charge is 15.3 grains H-110. Heavy roll crimp in the crimp groove.
    In my 686 I also load 15.3 grains of H-110. Everything about the 686 is a little tighter than the Blackhawk except accuracy with cast. The 686 slugs .3565. Cylinder throats are all spot on .357. I size to .358 for it. With both revolvers I let the cylinder throats minutely size the cast bullets. As luck would have it in both revolvers, they both wind up barely over bore size coming out of the cylinder. Both shoot pretty well but I have not been able to quite match the accuracy I get with a 158 XTP. Conversely I can not match the accuracy I get with a gas checked conventional lubed bullet if I powder coat.
    These are targets with the cast loads I worked up in my revolvers and a jacketed load for comparison.
    My jacketed load is 15.6 grains of H-110.(.3 gr more than my cast load)
    All groups are two handed slow fire @ 25 yards.

    This is a wheel full of gas checked 158 SWC in the 686 with H-110. Flattening the target on the table closed the holes up some but it grouped close to an inch.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	024D2C86-41D0-426B-A53D-B1D7B802B204.jpg 
Views:	4 
Size:	42.8 KB 
ID:	321771
    For comparison it does not match the accuracy of XTP’s pushed with H-110.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BE7AD8B2-0626-488B-83AD-23D85425B3D4.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	75.0 KB 
ID:	321772
    As you can see here the 686 does not match my Blackhawk with the SWC’s and H-110.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	87852C18-F160-4899-A850-E7AEA26D9B98.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	79.5 KB 
ID:	321773
    The only one of these I have chronographed is the gas checked SWC’s and H-110 in the 4 5/8” Blackhawk. Only shot one so extreme spread and SD remain unknown. The load is not blazing fast but works well enough on 100 yard silhouettes to satisfy my ability.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B9ADACB5-E694-4B8B-932F-65E7F6D99D17.jpg 
Views:	3 
Size:	46.9 KB 
ID:	321774
    I like H-110 in .357 Magnum.
    Great post.

    Man, I wish I could shoot like that. 1" groups at 25 yards!!!
    Don Verna


  9. #29
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    186
    You are too kind Don. I am nothing special. I just like to shoot a lot. All I really have to show for it is tinnitus and hearing aids…

  10. #30
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    69
    Thanks for all the comments and input. I am going to try some 2400 on Monday. I'll post my results from that attempt in a new post.

  11. #31
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    475
    I don't know what data source you were using, but you were well below Hodgdon's max load. H110 works better within 0.5 gr of max load. Many sources say NEVER reduce below 3% of max load. You reduced it by 11%. Going 2.7 gr below max like your starting load is just a waste of powder, primers, bullets and time. Whenever you want a reduced load with H110 what you actually want is a different powder. Shoot a few lighter loads to check for pressure, but don't expect much. As long as no pressure with lighter loads, work up closer to max and groups, ES and SD tighten up.


    You could probably immensely tighten up your ES by using a 359 bullet that is larger than your throats. That would allow you to build pressure as the bullet is leaving the crimp and swaging to the throats. Or, screw H110 and use a better powder for the job. If you only want 1200 fps you can get there with powders as fast as Unique and Power Pistol and load twice as many loads per pound. 1200 fps is doable with 2400 but still kinda wasting powder and getting high ES. I wouldn't go any lower than 13.5 of 2400 with your 158 before switching to a faster powder.

    My most accurate max effort revolver loads are with 2400. 14.8 gr with a powder coated 158-RF is good for 6 shots in under an inch at 25. My silhouette load is the NOE 154 gas check that seats more shallow and 15.3 gr will put all 6 in 5/8" at 25 over and over and it will put all 6 into about 8" at 200 yards, which is the limits of my eyes and the sight radius. Won a few blue, white and red ribbons with that bullet and load. It might shoot even tighter with a scope. 2400 also shoots great with 125 and 135 gr bullets. The Lee 125-rf and the Ranch Dog 135-RF will both shoot 6 shots under an inch at 25.

    My last tip is you said you used "a very heavy crimp". After a certain point, more crimp can lower case neck tension because the brass buckles away from the bullet body, reducing friction. You are already trimming cases, which is the most important step for a consistent case neck tension, so I would crimp about 1/2 turn on the die. Put a full length resized case in the die and back the die out until it doesn't crimp at all, then tighten the die body between 3/8 and 5/8 of a turn. 3/4 of a turn or more can start to reduce your neck tension, giving inconsistent ignition.
    Last edited by mnewcomb59; 01-09-2024 at 10:45 AM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check