Lee PrecisionRepackboxMidSouth Shooters SupplyLoad Data
Reloading EverythingTitan ReloadingWidenersInline Fabrication
RotoMetals2 Snyders Jerky
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 40 of 40

Thread: Winchester 73' 110yrds, 400yrds and 500yrds Long Distance Shots with a 44-40

  1. #21
    Winchester took the Model 1866 to 1866 Switzerland Trials in Switzerland.
    Here are the results from 300 paces (250 yards) to 1,000 paces (833 yards).
    These should be from at some sort of rest position because there is also a 300 pace off-hand target as well.


    From Winchester's 1873 Catalog

    Over-All Size Of Main Target = 6 feet x 6 feet, 6feet x 10 feet for 1,000 pace target.

    Large Squares = 6 Inches
    Small Squares = 1/10 of one foot (1 13/64")

    I left out the 400 Paces Target

    44 Henry Rimfire 300 Paces - 250 Yards Off-Hand
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	300 paces offhand.png 
Views:	22 
Size:	322.4 KB 
ID:	297931

    44 Henry Rimfire 300 Paces - 250 Yards
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	44henry300a.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	117.4 KB 
ID:	297932


    44 Henry Rimfire 600 Paces - 500 Yards
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	44henry600a.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	105.6 KB 
ID:	297933


    44 Henry Rimfire 800 Paces - 666 Yards
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	44henry800a.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	166.0 KB 
ID:	297934


    44 Henry Rimfire 1000 Paces - 833 Yards
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	44henry1000a.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	176.6 KB 
ID:	297935
    Last edited by Savvy Jack; 03-21-2022 at 11:34 AM.

  2. #22
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    One hour west of Klamath Falls, Oregon
    Posts
    578
    Could it have been done? Could it have been faked? You bet, choose one. I wouldn't have believed Jerry Miculek could pop a balloon at 1000 yards, standing on his hind legs shooting a 9mm revolver. Everyone is right.

    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3812/9...b3bb384efa.jpg

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by GL49 View Post
    Could it have been done? Could it have been faked? You bet, choose one. I wouldn't have believed Jerry Miculek could pop a balloon at 1000 yards, standing on his hind legs shooting a 9mm revolver. Everyone is right.

    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3812/9...b3bb384efa.jpg
    You mean we can't even talk about it?

  4. #24
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    One hour west of Klamath Falls, Oregon
    Posts
    578
    No, that's not what I was trying to point out.
    More and more often at this site someone posts something interesting, (no matter what the topic or what the forum), there always follows reasons why that couldn't happen, must be untrue, here's why it couldn't work, etc. That's great for discussion, I can follow along, learn a lot, form my own opinions, just as everyone is entitled to theirs. One, and only one, of the comments struck me little wrong, I get tired of that every so often. Probably if if had been said in person I wouldn't have given it a second thought, we all know how easy it is to misread or misinterpret what's written instead of what's said.
    Usually if I take time to write a reply to a less-than-positive comment (judging from the way I've read it) I just move on and don't post it. This time I clicked the wrong button and it posted. I should have gone back and deleted my reply, I apologize for the post and apologize if I've offended anyone.

    Once again, sorry for the comment and I'll keep quiet.

  5. #25
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,758
    I spose gotta remember too that winchester was specially selecting rifles at this time (1 of 100 and 1 of 1000) if he was looking for good feedback and knew (or knew of) these blokes as top marksmen - good chance they got a better than average rifle ?

  6. #26
    Boolit Master



    ddixie884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Avery, Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    The .44 Henry targets are even more impressive. You can't fake targets at major competitions too many witnesses.................
    JMHO-YMMV
    dd884
    gary@2texastrucks.com
    Gary D. Peek

  7. #27
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,758
    Quote Originally Posted by GL49 View Post
    Could it have been done? Could it have been faked? You bet, choose one. I wouldn't have believed Jerry Miculek could pop a balloon at 1000 yards, standing on his hind legs shooting a 9mm revolver. Everyone is right.

    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3812/9...b3bb384efa.jpg
    yeah I saw that one - I reckon from his reaction he was not expecting to actually hit it but looked like he did !

  8. #28
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    1,960
    I would expect the 44 Rimfire slug to start tumbling when the velocity drops below a certain level - and I wonder what the mid range trajectory was at 833 yds. I'm sure it would carry that far but the retained energy and speed would be pretty low.

    Back in high school, a friend of mine and I shot an original Colt cap and ball pistol across a large plowed field so we could see the balls hit the dirt. We could not get anything to go further than about 400 yds. when firing at a 45 degree angle. We found several balls laying on top of the ground with no visible marks aside from the rifling. At some point, you run out of steam...

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by HWooldridge View Post
    I would expect the 44 Rimfire slug to start tumbling when the velocity drops below a certain level - and I wonder what the mid range trajectory was at 833 yds. I'm sure it would carry that far but the retained energy and speed would be pretty low.

    Back in high school, a friend of mine and I shot an original Colt cap and ball pistol across a large plowed field so we could see the balls hit the dirt. We could not get anything to go further than about 400 yds. when firing at a 45 degree angle. We found several balls laying on top of the ground with no visible marks aside from the rifling. At some point, you run out of steam...
    Apparently the 44 Henry did fine. We see time and time again folks dinging a target at great distance with just about anything. Doesn't mean it will kill anything, just means the person was able to do it. On the other hand, 300 yards, the 44 is still deadly when loaded to original ballistics.

  10. #30
    Boolit Master Thumbcocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    East Central Illinois
    Posts
    4,513
    There is a formula i read somewhere that a round ball will only go a certain distance determined by the diameter of the ball like ball diameter x ____ = maximum distance.

    Were the .44 bullets hollow based? Does a hollow base like a Mini'e ball hit point forward at a longer distance?

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    Paper targets aren't your friends. They won't lie for you and they don't care if your feelings get hurt.

  11. #31
    Boolit Master


    Finster101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SW Fla
    Posts
    2,657
    This is making me want to dig the Uberti out of the safe. I think it has been 10 or 12 years since it had a range trip. Heck I might even have to jump in and get the tang sight I bought for it a few months ago mounted. This place if full of bad influences.

  12. #32
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    1,960
    These feats are similar in vein to Billy Dixon and the Adobe Walls story when he knocked a horse warrior off his mount at 1200-1500 yards with a Sharps. The Indian wasn’t killed but probably suffered a helluva bruise.

    The 44 Henry is probably lethal to 600 yds - I certainly would not stand downrange and let someone fire away at me…

  13. #33
    Original 44-40 BP loads were advertised at 1,325fps. This should be important because it makes or breaks impact velocity at 300 yards. To try an paint a mental picture, the original 44-40 Colt revolvers pushed a 200gr lead bullet over 900fps at the muzzle. Is 900fps enough to kill anything? If so, at 1,350fps at the muzzle....my impact velocities at 265 yards is 951fps and only an 11 degree to 12 degree angle. So, if 951fps is not enough killing power at 265 yards (300 yards), then neither is 951fps at the muzzle of a revolver. I guess what this means is that if a shooter is only getting 950fps from a rifle at the muzzle, he is no better off than a revolver with the same velocity. 300fps difference from 1,000fps to 1,300fps is not a lot.....until you look at the ballistic difference. So one must ask himself, why would Winchester say that...

    “The effect of this change [from 44 Henry to the 44-40] is to increase the initial velocity of the arm from about 1,125 fps to 1,325 feet per second."
    So why have a 44-40 now days that is performing to less than the 44 Henry ballistics?

  14. #34
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Cordele, GA
    Posts
    472

  15. #35
    I have always enjoyed watching his videos. That was another good one!

  16. #36
    Gotta love the rain, or at least the day after. Some much needed R&R time....at the range!!

    Today's target compared with Winchester's 1866 Switzerland Trials target.
    I have the hardest time trying to get photos uploaded here I will just share the link to the photos here:
    https://sites.google.com/view/44winc...t/2022-targets

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	No. 1A800.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	81.9 KB 
ID:	298695Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277592239_1017502372524440_3431525481302184752_nA800.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	81.3 KB 
ID:	298696Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277822645_554190322565666_1511610291860737242_n800.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	158.6 KB 
ID:	298697Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277818452_3206738499597970_7089206748650012305_n800.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	179.1 KB 
ID:	298698
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277821252_1011115523137134_2183874590545690547_n800.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	257.5 KB 
ID:	298699Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277818454_1026768234857665_3605502185458488273_n800.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	252.4 KB 
ID:	298700Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277829463_803029401087297_4383356468664623508_n800.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	253.8 KB 
ID:	298701
    Last edited by Savvy Jack; 04-06-2022 at 06:12 PM.

  17. #37
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	277592239_1017502372524440_3431525481302184752_nAoverlay800.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	86.4 KB 
ID:	298808

    This image overlay is cool

  18. #38
    Boolit Master Cap'n Morgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,458
    Remember this scene from "lonesome Dove"? Good fun was had from nearly all the involved...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmYug0g1s2I
    Cap'n Morgan

  19. #39
    The Battle of Königgrätz

    Say what? During the time between 14 June and 22 July 1866, the Prussians fought the Austrians. These battles were well observed by the Swiss. It was here that the Swiss decided that they were in need of modern breech-loading weapons.

    The Swiss made a Decree that they would find and arm their sharpshooters and Army with breech-loading rifles on 20 July 1866.

    During the 6th and 8th days of October, Winchester had already shipped the Model of 1866 to Switzerland for the Swiss Trials. On these two days the aforementioned targets were made.

    On the 12th of October the Swiss government proposed an order for 8,000 repeaters for their best outfits but soon changed the proposal to between 90,000 and 110,000 repeaters to arm all of their soldiers. A condition to the contract would be that Winchester would also provide all of the tooling necessary for the 66's to be manufactured in Switzerland. Winchester could not or would not agree and offered some sort of counteroffer with the Henry rifle. The deal fell quiet and eventually Winchester backed off. I am unsure of the details.

    The Report To The Commission For The Introduction Of The Breech-Loading Arms was dated Oct 1866 and published in Winchester's 1873 catalog. The information I posted above is not included in the report. The report talks about the Winchester Rifle - A. The Trajectory, B. The Precision and C. The Rapidity of Fire.

    Now you know the rest of the story.

    https://sites.google.com/view/44winc...zerland-trials

  20. #40
    Boolit Master

    pworley1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    3,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Cap'n Morgan View Post
    Remember this scene from "lonesome Dove"? Good fun was had from nearly all the involved...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmYug0g1s2I
    That was my favorite scene.
    NRA Benefactor Member NRA Golden Eagle

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check