Is This Good News for Marlin Lovers?

[uscra112]

Report that Sturm Ruger has acquired the Marlin assets out of the Remington bankruptcy.

https://ruger.com/corporate/marlin.html

[sukivel]

I hope...

Marlin Precision Levergun!!!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[smkummer]

Let’s hope.

[turtlezx]

IT TOOK REMINGTON years to get there lever guns sorted out
See if ruger has the same issues

[uscra112]

Ruger hasn't got the legacy problems that have crippled the Remington brand. It's still a company steered by engineers. Remington has been run by and for bean counters for decades.

(I could write a book about how the American machine tool industry was destroyed by "management by MBA". The same mindset that is destroying Boeing while we watch.)

[Outpost75]

I worked in Ruger's engineering department in the 1980s. I know a bit about how they think. When I was with the company it was run by engineers educated at the US Naval Academy, West Point, MIT, Marquette, Oxford, King's College and the Technical University of Munich. I was the odd man out being a 1971 Virginia Tech Hokie.

When Marlin closed its New Haven operation only the modern CNC machinery went to Remington. The older WW2-era machines were all auctioned and most went to Brazil or China. I expect that Ruger is interested mostly in the best modern computerized machinery from Remington, and less in the rights to any existing Remington or Marlin product line. They will do a careful analysis of which product lines can be produced profitably, which will not compete with existing Ruger products. They will avoid the Remington Walker trigger lawsuit guns like the plague. They have no interest in pump shotguns or in .22 rifles which would compete with their existing products.

Ruger will only seek to produce only those Marlin or Remington products to fill niches which enhance their profitability. I see them continuing only the most profitable, high demand items. The others will disappear. I believe that the .357 Mag. 1894 leverguns would survive because they would be strong sellers. Possibly the .44 Magnums and .45-70 hunting rifles, but there is too much foreign competition in the cowboy action market and Ruger is content with their revolver piece of that. They will acquire only the best modern machines which enable them to expand production capacity at Prescott exploiting that added capacity in their existing, most profitable product lines. I see no incentive to revive old ones in which would sell fewer than 50,000 units annually. The profitability simply isn't there.

[uscra112]

That is a good analysis. As in any takeover of this kind, the hard assets are the always main consideration. Been there myself.

The announcement says that they are taking up only the Marlin product line. None of the Remington branded products. The current Marlin .22s will go certainly. If I were Ruger, I'd buy that line just to shut down the competition. Not that I like it - I'm no fan of the 10/22, but business is business. But it's a shame that younger shooters will never know the pleasure of owning a new, tight, deadly accurate 39a.

Will the custom shop survive? Will there be parts for the zillion or so 39a .22s still around? Parts for the other zillion or so 336s? We can hope.

I'd beg that they produce a .357 Magnum on the less costly 336 platform. I might just justify one more new gun before I shuttle off this mortal coil if they do.

I suppose it would be too much to ask that they restart producing Ballards. . . . . . . . .

[sharps4590]

I suppose it would be too much to ask that they restart producing Ballards. . . . . . . .

One can only hope....in futility I fear. Perhaps Ruger will continue some of the more popular lever rifles and get them back to some semblance of sleek, svelte and elegant rather than the baseball bats Remington was turning out.

[recumbent]

Good news

[junkbug]

Thank you for the insights Outpost. I am certain a few very vocal people will be howling for a 1894 .44 mag, with a 1 to 20” twist. But I would personally bet against it happening. As you said, not enough sustainable demand, and I believe the design just doesn’t have the factor of safety to give everyone with money on the line a “warm and fuzzy feeling “. I hope I am wrong.

[mattw]

I am afraid the most of the Marlin line and parts will be completely lost to history. I am sure that they will make a lever gun or 2 that they think they can sell, but I think we will be screwed for the good 700 or 40X actions and I suspect that all Marlin parts will just dry up. Now any new "Marlin" will be roll stamped from end to end with Ruger warnings and we will need to expect crap triggers going forward.

Personally, I am happy that I have my 1980 1894 in 357 and my 41 1894.

[Ajohns]

Rumor has it they're going to come back with the 1894 lever in added - 218 Bee, 25/20, 256 Win, 327 Federal, 32/20, 38 & 44 wcf. 20" barrel round or octagon.
Then, the 96/22 and 44 will be back, the 44 will also have a 357 Bain & Davis round added. 20" medium weight barrel.

Kidding, that's bs. But it would be neat to see them get adventurous

[kens]

I suppose it would be too much to ask that they restart producing Ballards. . . . . . . .

One can only hope....in futility I fear. Perhaps Ruger will continue some of the more popular lever rifles and get them back to some semblance of sleek, svelte and elegant rather than the baseball bats Remington was turning out.

Now thats a thought......
y'know Ruger has every year some special edition distributed only to select dealers and in limited numbers,
perhaps a Ballard let out as limited edition???
interesting

[Cosmic_Charlie]

That is a good analysis. As in any takeover of this kind, the hard assets are the always main consideration. Been there myself.

The announcement says that they are taking up only the Marlin product line. None of the Remington branded products. The current Marlin .22s will go certainly. If I were Ruger, I'd buy that line just to shut down the competition. Not that I like it - I'm no fan of the 10/22, but business is business. But it's a shame that younger shooters will never know the pleasure of owning a new, tight, deadly accurate 39a.

Will the custom shop survive? Will there be parts for the zillion or so 39a .22s still around? Parts for the other zillion or so 336s? We can hope.

I'd beg that they produce a .357 Magnum on the less costly 336 platform. I might just justify one more new gun before I shuttle off this mortal coil if they do.

I suppose it would be too much to ask that they restart producing Ballards. . . . . . . . .

I would love to see them make a light weight .357 lever rifle. Smaller receiver, light furniture and a carbon fiber mag tube. Short lever throw too.

[farmbif]

the bottom line is most important for any business to stay afloat. I guess we will have to wait and see. im wondering if the 39a will ever be produced again, for my own greedy reasons I hope not but then again many youngsters will be missing out if it never comes back. last one I saw in a store wasn't all that nice and not even a mounties was priced at $1295, its probably still there collecting dust. we can only hope they will be successful and produce a quality straight shooting lever gun once again.

[Drm50]

I have always liked Marlin levers. I never did have much use for Marlin 60 rifle. They were accurate but the feed mechanism left a lot to be desired. I was early cheerleader for 10/22 but the Bean Counters have ruined it too. I never did like Remington post war products. The original Ruger 77s were better guns than Rem 700s, but they too have Bean rash.

The bottom line is there won’t be Marlins made by Ruger or anyone else that equal the JM Marlins made of machined steel. The design may be made but it will be made with modern materials and processes. This is what Henry’s business plan has been, along with good QC & CS makes it work.
Which will work because the new generation of buyers are not interested to much in Levers. It’s the black guns, AR & Ak, gun buster plastic pistols that are selling.

[John Boy]

Am sure that Ruger developed a business plan before their decision to buy Marlin. And what is in store for Marlin products will be quality to support their reputation of quality Ruger products AND customer service.
One question ... Marlin bought out NEF and H&R ... will they continue to produce
barrels for these rifles? There is a big demand for multi caliber barrels for these single shots. Otherwise the only source will be the used market primarily the same as now because Remington deserted these rifles

[dragon813gt]

Ruger is only purchasing Marlin. They are not purchasing any Remington IP. So as it stands they are adding lever actions to their product portfolio which they currently don’t produce. It seems like a win for both Ruger and the consumer.

[Burnt Fingers]

Am sure that Ruger developed a business plan before their decision to buy Marlin. And what is in store for Marlin products will be quality to support their reputation of quality Ruger products AND customer service.
One question ... Marlin bought out NEF and H&R ... will they continue to produce
barrels for these rifles? There is a big demand for multi caliber barrels for these single shots. Otherwise the only source will be the used market primarily the same as now because Remington deserted these rifles

The holding company that owns PSA purchased NEF and H&R.

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...on-asset-bids/

This details who got what.

It's important to note. Ruger did not get Remington, only Marlin.

[FergusonTO35]

Cautiously optimistic!!