In the interest of full disclosure I'm basically a revolver man: I only own 2 center fire automatics (both SR1911). My revolvers are S&W & Ruger. I have never owned a Taurus. I've heard good things & bad things about them and most of the bad things are CS/shipping charges related.
I'm fortunate to have my own range & a close family friend comes out to shoot with a new 4" blue Taurus Tracker in .44 magnum. He liked the size, weight & feel of the gun (had replaced grips with Hogues) & most of all he liked the price. After a brief shooting session he had the following complaints:
1. Rough action
2. Heavy trigger pull
3. Hammer dragging on the L. @ full cock & dragging on the R. when down.
4. Cylinder difficult to open
My examination before disassembly:
Cylinder gap=.006, end shake=.001, cylinder length would not allow #429421 boolits & rear sight not square with the front.
Rear sight problem traced to loose fit of retaining pin to rear sight (sight retaining pin fit to frame is correct). Finger pressure brings sight to correct position (replacement sight with correct hole size would solve the problem).
Disassembly Impressions:
1. Front side plate screw was loose (should have been a warning but went unheeded)
2. All moving parts under the side plate were well made & had an excellent finish (no tool marks).
3. The mechanism seems to be a combination of S&W type hammer & trigger with a Ruger type hammer spring & strut. The trigger return spring was situated similar to S&W but utilized a Ruger type strut rather than the S&W return spring housing. The transfer bar was almost identical to the Ruger SA, except it is smaller & better finished. The transfer bar connection to the trigger seemed to be a closer fit than the Ruger SA.
4. All interior surfaces (frame & side plate) were finished well ( every bit as good as S&W).
My efforts to correct complaints:
1. Hammer flats stoned to a level surface & shimmed (.008 to L & .005 to R,).
2. Wolfe hammer (11 lb.) & trigger (10 lb.) springs installed.
3. Interior surfaces lightly stoned.
4. Hammer notch reduced to .019
Results: smooth action & a trigger that would hold a 4.5 lb. weight, but would not hold a 4.75 lb. weight. Not a target trigger, but smooth.
It was then that I discovered that I should have tackled the #4 complaint 1st. (the difficulty in opening cylinder)
PHOTOS:
#1: Before reassembly with side plate removed
#2: Side plate front screw. Note it differs from S&W. It is a 3 piece arrangement: hollow screw, spring & plunger.
#3: Close-up of crane end. Note front screw plunger rides on edge of the "V" rather than the center.
#4: Side view with side plate removed & crane in place. "V" in crane not centered.
#5: Sketch of the problem: A on left shows misalignment described above. B shows proper relationship
The misalignment can only be corrected with a properly fitted crane. The technician that assembled this gun should have recognized this and probably did, but made the crane pass inspection by not torqueing the front side plate screw properly. The spring would coil bind under pressure & make the plunger bare down on the slope of the "V" notch rather than bottom of the "V" notch if torqued correctly.
I'm running out of room here & will continue on another page: Taurus Experience : Part 2