Inline FabricationMidSouth Shooters SupplyLoad DataReloading Everything
Titan ReloadingWidenersLee PrecisionRotoMetals2
Repackbox
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50

Thread: 44 SPL pressure test of 2400 and 44-250-K

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,303

    44 SPL pressure test of 2400 and 44-250-K

    44 SPL with 2400 & 44-250-K; Keith’s loads


    In the previous thread [http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...d-report/page3, post #53] I posted this;

    Yesterday I loaded up the 44 SPL test rounds. I loaded 10 shots each of 16.0, 16.5, 17.0 and 17.5 gr Alliant 2400 in both WRA cases and new Starline 44 SPL cases. The bullet was the RCBS 44-250-K cast of COWW + 2 % tin. They were sized .430 and lubed with BAC. OAL is; 1.565".

    Surprisingly the WRA cases were only 0.5. gr less weight than the Starline cases. The WRAs also had a much larger ES of weight than did the Starline cases.

    The WRAs were primed with some old Remington 2 1/2 LP primers as those may have been used by Keith. The Starline cases were primed with WLP primers as they are readily available today.

    I also loaded 10 shots each of both WRA/2 1/2 cases and Starline/WLP cases and 16.0 gr of 27 year old Hercules 2400 for a comparison to the same loads with Alliant 2400. However, 10 shots of 17.5 gr Alliant 2400 were also loaded in WRA cases with WLP primers for a direct comparison of case to case pressures.


    The test was conducted early this morning. There were no surprises as the pressures and velocities were as expected. Previously in the thread I had posted the psi of a previous test (2/25/2019) conducted last year using the RCBS 44-250-K bullet in Starline 44 SPL cases with Winchester WLP primers using 16.0 gr Hercules 2400. The psi was 19,300 with a velocity of 1198 fps out of the same test Contender barrel. Test temperature then was 45 degrees.

    The test this morning was conducted on the same range from the same bench, but the temperature was 85 – 95 degrees during the test. All test equipment and components were shaded however with nothing other than the screens in direct sun light. With that it was expected the 40+ degree difference would give an increase in psi and velocity. It did but not as much as I expected.

    Test conditions;

    Ten shot test strings of each charge
    Target at 50 yards
    Start screen at 10’ but the M43 corrects the velocity to the muzzle
    Temperature; 85-95 degrees
    Humidity; 7%
    Barometric pressure; 29.76
    Altitude; 908’ ASL

    Test firearm;

    Contender with 8.4” barrel
    Sights; Bushnell 1.5X

    Pressure and velocity measured via Oehler M43

    Test results WITH Alliant 2400;

    A2400……Case……..Primer……Velocity…..SD…..ES……..PSI(M 43)……SD……..ES
    Charge
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    16.0………WRA………2 ˝ …………1225……..21…….69………20,800…….1,400….4,200
    ……………….SL………..WLP…………1288……..19…….64………23,400…….1, 300….4,000

    16.5……… WRA………2 ˝ …………1275……..11…….29………22,500……..700……2,000
    ……………….SL………..WLP……….…1325………9………32………25,000……..90 0……2,900

    17.0……… WRA………2 ˝ …………1346……..13…….43………26,400…….1,300….3,900
    ……………….SL………..WLP……….…1367………8………25………26,300………700 …...1,800

    17.5……….WRA………2 ˝ …………1378……..14…….41………27,600…….1,800….4,200
    ……………….SL………..WLP………..…1400……..19…….58………29,800……. 1,500….4,500

    Test results with Hercules 2400;
    ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16.0…….. WRA………2 ˝ …………1275……..19…….54………21,300…….1,200….3,700
    ……………….SL………..WLP……….…1264……..21…….62………20,600…….1 ,000….3,200

    As we can see the Hercules 2400 performed very similar to Alliant 2400.

    As to accuracy the 16.0 and 16.5 gr groups all were 2 – 2.5”. Even with the excellent internals recorded accuracy with the 17.0 and 17.5 gr groups ran 4 – 6”. As similar 1350 – 1500 fps velocity loads in magnum cases hold accuracy I’m suspecting the bullets are obturating at the psi level of those charges in the unsupported part of the chamber in front of the 44 SPL cases in the 44 magnum chamber.

    I seem to recall(?) Elmer claimed 1200 fps with the 17.5 gr load out of 6 – 6 ˝” barreled Colt FT SAs. So I chronographed (10 shots) of 17.5 gr in the WRA cases with 2 ˝ Remington primers. The muzzle velocity was 1177 fps [20 fps SD, 58 fps ES]. With my old eyes and shaky hands I managed to put 8 of them into 2.9” at 50 yards with the other two making it right at a 4” group……’bout the best I can do with the iron sights. Maybe old Elmer wasn’t too far off……..
    Last edited by Larry Gibson; 06-22-2020 at 06:12 PM.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy fn1889m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    145

    44 SPL pressure test of 2400 and 44-250-K

    Oh. I thought that read “.44 SPL pleasure test...” at first.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
    Last edited by fn1889m; 06-22-2020 at 07:13 PM.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,794
    Thanks, Larry Gibson, more valuable data on some well known loads. Since my 44 specials are both 5 shot midsize guns(GP100 and 696), you have confirmed these loads are more than I want to put thru them. And, even better, a quantifiable value to make the decision. I suspect the 17 gr loads might have been quite a bit of “pleasure”! Would be a handful in a 696 for sure!
    “You don’t practice until you get it right. You practice until you can’t get it wrong.” Jason Elam, All-Pro kicker, Denver Broncos

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master Outpost75's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    over the hill, out in the woods and far away
    Posts
    10,158
    Very interesting. I have had good results in the past using 16 grains of #2400 in .44 Magnum brass with good accuracy and acceptable ballistic uniformity.

    Attachment 263986
    The ENEMY is listening.
    HE wants to know what YOU know.
    Keep it to yourself.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master 35 Whelen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    North Central Texas
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks for the tests Larry. Good information there. Do you think chamber pressure would be different from a revolver?

    When I bought my Flat Top Blackhawk some 7 years ago, I tried the Keith load too:



    I was really surprised at the accuracy and the pictured group wasn't a fluke, as I shot a few others. The bullet in that load was a 429421.

    For the game I hunt, I now load the RCBS 44-250 KT and velocities are slightly lower than same loads with the 429421 because of the difference in the amount of bullet in the case. I don't see any need in loading over 1,000 fps unless someday I get an untamed follicle and decide to pursue elk with a revolver instead of a rifle.

    Thanks again for your work.

    35W
    The biggest waste of time is arguing with the fool and fanatic who doesn't care about truth or reality, but only the victory of his beliefs and illusions.
    There are people who, for all the evidence presented to them, do not have the ability to understand.

    NRA Life Member

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    OKC , Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,384
    Thank you for post Larry , this information is going to be very helpful for many of us.

  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    148
    Larry , I personally want to thank you for that info / test using different loads and showing only slight difference between Alliant / Hercules powders . It shows only " lot to lot " variation , as you have stated numerous times in the past . Regards Paul

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,303
    35 Whelen

    "Do you think chamber pressure would be different from a revolver?"

    It is "assumed", most often, the pressure would be slightly less in a revolver chamber than in a test barrel given the same ammunition. The thought is the long cylinder throat [essentially free-bore] and the barrel cylinder gap would reduce the psi. However, after observing the measured time/pressure curves and the "rise" to peak pressure of many pistol loads indicates peak pressure in handgun cartridges would most often occur before the bullet is fully into the barrel. That is even with the slow burning powders such as 2400. That's why, when pressures are excessive, the bulging and/or bursting occurs in the cylinder.

    Many years ago before I began pressure testing I read an article where an Oehler M43 was used to measure the psi of a 357 magnum with the strain gauge affixed over a chamber on a revolver cylinder. As I recall (?) t was found the measured psi was very close to that obtained in a solid test barrel with the same ammunition. I've wanted to do the same test but since the bluing is removed to affix the gauge I haven't done it. Thought maybe a stainless might work as well or a revolver that was going to be refinished? Just haven't found a "donor" revolver for that yet as there must also be sufficient space between the cylinder and top strap for the gauge to freely fit.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    OKC , Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,384
    Well it is great to see the difference in the Starline cases I don't think I will work up past 16 grains with them in my flat top Ruger .
    Thanks again.
    For another great post.

  10. #10
    Vendor Sponsor

    DougGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    just above Raleigh North Carolina
    Posts
    7,394
    I have long opined that since the Flattop 45 is known to be safe with 45ACP+P pressures of 23kpsi, that the Flattop 44 would be safe with loads up to 25kpsi because of it's slightly thicker cylinder walls.

    The load with 17.0gr 2400 slightly eclipses that figure, but not by much, (and since my 25k pressure rating was purely speculative, no real testing or proven data to substantiate such claim), I would say that I would consider 17.0gr 2400 a safe but maximum charge in SL brass, with the same boolit at the same COA.

    Just out of curiosity I would be interested in the same tests, using H110, the other "go to" slow burn powder. Of course charge weights would be different.

    Thank you VERY much Larry for your time and expertise and for posting your results!
    Got a .22 .30 .32 .357 .38 .40 .41 .44 .45 .480 or .500 S&W cylinder that needs throats honed? 9mm, 10mm/40S&W, 45 ACP pistol barrel that won't "plunk" your handloads? 480 Ruger or 475 Linebaugh cylinder that needs the "step" reamed to 6° 30min chamfer? Click here to send me a PM You can also find me on Facebook Click Here.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master



    ddixie884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Avery, Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    Thanx Larry. It seems you managed to prove that some of our basic ideas have some validity. I'm surprised there wasn't more difference in some of the pressures and velocity values. H2400 and A2400 are really close in burning rates and modern cases and primers do seem to cause slightly higher pressures, but not as much as I might have assumed. Speculation is well and good but real data is very welcome. Thanx again for the labor and expense for the test........
    Last edited by ddixie884; 07-14-2020 at 06:01 PM. Reason: clarity
    JMHO-YMMV
    dd884
    gary@2texastrucks.com
    Gary D. Peek

  12. #12
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Foothills, NC
    Posts
    2,223
    Good work!

  13. #13
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Communism running rampant!
    Posts
    4,732
    Thank you!

    Three44s
    Quote Originally Posted by Bret4207

    “There is more to this than dumping lead in a hole.”

  14. #14
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    97
    Good data Larry ... if I was even remotely nearby, I'd bring some VvN110 over to see what that should test out to under the 250-K as well. I had my hopes up that someone closer would offer. Nonetheless, Hats off for the 2400 work.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master



    ddixie884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Avery, Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    I'd like to see the results on the VV 110 myself.......
    JMHO-YMMV
    dd884
    gary@2texastrucks.com
    Gary D. Peek

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,303
    I checked the LGS's for a lb of VV 110 but found none. Not surprising given the current situation......
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    763
    Thanks, Larry!

  18. #18
    Boolit Buddy JAC43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    141
    Thanks for all the work, Larry. Do you happen to know the case capacity of the WRA cases? I've been looking for some to measure the water capacity in grains for my load notes. Seems they are pretty scarce nowadays.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,303
    Do you want some WRA cases?
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  20. #20
    Boolit Buddy JAC43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    141
    PM sent

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check