RepackboxLoad DataRotoMetals2Inline Fabrication
Titan ReloadingLee PrecisionMidSouth Shooters SupplyWideners
Snyders Jerky Reloading Everything
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Alloy for 35 Remington

  1. #1
    Boolit Master
    high standard 40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Posts
    1,213

    Alloy for 35 Remington

    OK, I have a Remington XP100R in 35 Remington. I have taken a few deer with this using jacketed bullets but I now wish to dedicate this gun to cast bullets only. I have the RCBS 200gr mold and have taken deer in my 35 Remington rifle using an alloy of 50/50 COWW/pure. I was not pleased with the exit wounds or the blood trails I got with that combination. So my question is this. How soft of an alloy can I use if I powder coat? The XP100 is a far stronger action than required for SAAMI spec 35 Remington so I have the flexibility in this 14" XP to load low velocity or up to full potential. I want better expansion and energy transfer so I want as soft an alloy as I can get away with. What is the softest alloy I can use if powder coated and gas checked. Shots will be limited to under 100 yards.

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    How fast were you pushing them? I just mixed up 20 pounds of the same alloy for my 35 Rem but didn’t cast with it today.

    I did load some lee 200 grainers I casted up about a year ago with the same 50/50 alloy for my 35 Rem today. My 50/50 COWW and pure lead w/2%pewter added has a BH of 10.5. I do own a group buy HP 200 grain mold. I might have to mix up some 16/1 pure and pewter mix with a BH of 7.5 for it to try instead. I’ve tested the 16/1 pure and pewter mix with a 7.5 BH alloy out of my Ruger 77/44 to max velocities with a GC and PC with zero leading. Book says max velocities are around 1850 FPS? The best accuracy was a couple grains below max at I chronographed 1600 FPS. I haven’t tried the 16/1 alloy on deer yet but in a 265 grain Lyman devastator 44 cal they sure expand to a very large diameter in dirt and water. All I know is if i can’t get good accuracy with a max loading or close to with cast out of my 35 Rems I’ll use energy dumping J Words for hunting deer. After watching 2 deer run over a 100 yards with double lung shots back to back my 44 mag rifle at 1750 FPS using 15.4 Bh alloy and lyman devastator HP boolits I'm with you. The boolits never expanded and very poor blood trails. I want a boolit that will leave a couple inch exit hole. I think my 7.5 Bh alloy in my HP will be the ticket if I can get it to group at close to a max load.

    I’ll watch this thread. I would think a HP cast boolit would make a big exit hole. How large of an exit holes are you getting on deer with the 50/50 lees?
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-14-2020 at 06:30 PM.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    high standard 40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Posts
    1,213
    The exit holes were little more than bullet diameter. I have yet to loose a deer with that cast load but tracking was tough. Unsure of velocity. No chrono.

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    This the group buy HP mold I have...

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...375402-358-200

    Mine is GC version. It came with a penta hp pin, the standard round HP pin, and plug so it can be casted as a solid boolit (w/o a HP). I was told by other members here to use the penta pin for rapid expansion. I think I’ll be be just fine with 50/50 alloy. I’m think if I go to soft I run into the same issue I did with using the softer alloy in my 77/44. It’s best accuracy with the softer alloy was at lower velocities even with a GC and PC. The harder 15.4 bh alloy I was shooting a hair over MOA at max load of 23.8 grains of H110. Softer alloy I was over twice that for a group measurement.

    I read guys were getting 3” exits around 1900 FPS with your allow choice out of a 35 remington after drilling a 3/8” HP cavity in it using a drill bit. I think I’m going to cast with the round HP pin. I just don’t see the awkward looking penta HP holding as tight of groups at long range as the normal Round HP. It looks just to awkward.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-14-2020 at 07:23 PM.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master RU shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    SW Pa.
    Posts
    2,928
    I'm shooting the longer barreled brother of your xp100 with the lee version of that bullet. I've pushed that same50/50 alloy pretty hard never got an leading but groups opened up some im pretty sure I could cut it with more soft lead and still shoot at factory load speeds .Mine aren't powder coated just GC and regular lube with an over coat of BLL .
    If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!

  6. #6
    Boolit Master zymguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Ely MN. (bwcaw)
    Posts
    702
    Quote Originally Posted by Tripplebeards View Post
    This the group buy HP mold I have...

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...375402-358-200

    Mine is GC version. It came with a penta hp pin, the standard round HP pin, and plug so it can be casted as a solid boolit (w/o a HP). I was told by other members here to use the penta pin for rapid expansion. I think I’ll be be just fine with 50/50 alloy. I’m think if I go to soft I run into the same issue I did with using the softer alloy in my 77/44. It’s best accuracy with the softer alloy was at lower velocities even with a GC and PC. The harder 15.4 bh alloy I was shooting a hair over MOA at max load of 23.8 grains of H110. Softer alloy I was over twice that for a group measurement.

    I read guys were getting 3” exits around 1900 FPS with your allow choice out of a 35 remington after drilling a 3/8” HP cavity in it using a drill bit. I think I’m going to cast with the round HP pin. I just don’t see the awkward looking penta HP holding as tight of groups at long range as the normal Round HP. It looks just to awkward.
    I have not found the penta to be any less accurate than the solid In my 358 win
    I haven’t set any accuracy records either


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    high standard 40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Posts
    1,213
    Does anybody have experience with alloy softer than 50/50 with powdercoat? How fast can you push a pure lead gaschecked bullet with powdercoat?

  8. #8
    Banned








    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    munising Michigan
    Posts
    17,725
    I shot two deer one year with that bullet in my 356. Casted out of 5050 ww/lino. Both deer died within 50 yards. If its expansion your looking for you should get yourself a hp mold because expansion will be iffy with that bullet even with 5050 ww/pure. Most likely what will happen is the nose will deform and the bullet will dive out of the deer and not track straight inside of it. Never had much luck with soft flat nose bullets.
    Quote Originally Posted by high standard 40 View Post
    OK, I have a Remington XP100R in 35 Remington. I have taken a few deer with this using jacketed bullets but I now wish to dedicate this gun to cast bullets only. I have the RCBS 200gr mold and have taken deer in my 35 Remington rifle using an alloy of 50/50 COWW/pure. I was not pleased with the exit wounds or the blood trails I got with that combination. So my question is this. How soft of an alloy can I use if I powder coat? The XP100 is a far stronger action than required for SAAMI spec 35 Remington so I have the flexibility in this 14" XP to load low velocity or up to full potential. I want better expansion and energy transfer so I want as soft an alloy as I can get away with. What is the softest alloy I can use if powder coated and gas checked. Shots will be limited to under 100 yards.

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    Been contemplating on penta vs the normal round HP pin. I think I’m going to go with my gut and cast with the round pin. Here’s a test someone did with both...

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...xpansion/page2

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,326
    I use the 35-200-FN in my 35 Rem but the rifle is a rebarreled M91 Mauser so I push it a lot more than SAAMI MAP loads which are based on the ability of the Remington M8 and M81s. As I push the COWW +2% tin then mixed 50/50 with lead at 2150 fps I've found excellent terminal performance out to 200 yards.. I also HP the bullets with a 1/8" Forster HP tool to 3/16" deep. Expansion and penetration have proven excellent with deer just going down within several yards. Note: I don't do "lung shots (behind the shoulder) nor Texas heart shots. I envision a soccer ball low against the brisket between the legs and put the bullet through that regardless of the angle. Bullet wounds have always tracked true and through and through.

    However, the OP isn't going to achieve that performance with his shorter barreled XP100. He should be able to obtain 1600 - 1800 fps though. OP doesn't say what the load he's using is but might give H4895 a try or RL7. With that I suggest using a 16-1 (lead - tin) alloy. I don't powder coat but use GCs and a proper lube. The softer, more malleable alloy sans any antimony will expand nicely. I believe the deer in southern Louisiana to be a bit on the smaller side so thought might be given to HPing them also. The Forster HP tool works fine with a case trimmer.

    Pictures are of a nice little Texas buck shot at about 90 yards, the exit wound and the 35 Rem w/HP'd bullet.

    Attachment 260373Attachment 260374Attachment 260375
    Last edited by Larry Gibson; 04-15-2020 at 10:28 AM.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    Larry, do you think the softer 16:1 will hold descent groups up to 2000 FPS or a hair over? I GC and PC. I know my best load in my 77/44 with the 16:1 alloy came from a lower velocity(1600fps). Maybe I’ll have to load test both. If I can get away with a softer alloy that expands and blows huge holes I’d be excited. I’ve watched your 50/50 posts and looks like you definitely found what works. I’d just like even a little more expansion and bigger holes...if that’s possible.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-15-2020 at 11:07 AM.

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,326
    I don't know as I haven't tested 16-1 alloy above 1800 fps. I usually default to the COWW + 2% tin mixed 50/50 alloy above that. I guess the only way to know is to test as you suggest?
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  13. #13
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    I broke in the MP HP 200 grain group buy .360 mold today. I used my 16 to 1 pure lead and pewter mix that has a BH of 7.5. I chose the deep round HP pin. I did get finning around the HP openings. I’m sure it’s because I ran my alloy and mold a little hot. I rubbed the HP cavities on a piece of paper sitting on a flat surface back and forth a couple of times to remove the finning. I separated them in 1 grain increments and the majority of my batch weighed 198 grains. I’ll PC, size, and GC with what I have left for 35 cal GC’s tomorrow.



    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-17-2020 at 09:52 AM.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master
    high standard 40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Posts
    1,213
    To take the deer I mentioned earlier I used a T/C Contender carbine with a 20" MGM barrel. The load was 34 grains of H4895. I estimated the velocity at about 1900fps but that's just a guess based on published data. The shot distances were about 75 yards on average. I do have one of the Forster hollow pointing tools. I'm going to cast some more bullets with a 20/1 alloy and hollow point them to try. I checked my "lead alloy calculator" and the 20/1 has a BH of 10 compared to the 50/50 that Larry referenced with a BH of 10.3. My thoughts are that the 20/1 with no antimony will be a more malleable alloy, although perhaps not as strong an alloy as the 50/50. I also still have some of the original 50/50 loads and I'll hollow point some of those to test also.

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    My 16 to 1 that published data says is 11 BH tested at 7.5 BH when I tested it in my Lee hardness tester.

    Here what this alloy did at 1600 FPS in a dirt backstop at 25 yards out of my Ruger 77/44 and a 44 caliber 263 grain Lyman devastator HP.








    Here the water test I’d did with it at the same speed. The hard water medium melted the alloy to a flat looking slug and weighed about 136 grains. The dirt slug weighed about 184 grains. The boolit started at 263 grains. You can see how all the tin made my alloy pedals flow back and not shatter with the slug I recovered from the dirt backstop.





    Both way harder of a test medium then thin skinned game. I’m hoping that the soft alloy expands rapid and violent enough to blow a huge hole in a deer at 2000 FPS in my 35 Rem 336 & 7600 carbine. Also in my 35 whelen 7600 carbine.

    I was afraid that this alloy was to soft after the water test so I used 80/20 with 15% pewter at 1750 FPS. It made a perfect mushroom in my water test but never expanded through three deer I shot within seconds apart which equaled long trailing with little to no blood.

    I’m guessing my pewter/pure 16:1 mix is as close to soft lead pure lead as it’s 7.5 Bh vs the 5BH the pure lead started out as but all the tin makes it tough as holds together. I haven’t tried it on a deer yet but in sure it should leave a good size exit hole.

    My 50/50 mix with 2%pewter tested at 10.5 BH and acted about the same as my 16:1 in a water my test at 1750 FPS. If you check my home page I posted pics of the expanded boolits and alloys I water tested with weights listed.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-15-2020 at 08:46 PM.

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    I just PC’d my batch. You can see how large the HP cavity is. At 7.5. BH it should make one heck of a hole at 35 remington velocities. These couple purple ones were my rejects that I had fun mixing PC colors and tumbling.

    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-16-2020 at 10:16 PM.

  17. #17
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Posts
    6,067
    I have had no trouble getting the RCBS bullet up to a little over 2000 fps in 14 inch Contender barrels but likely a bit in excess of SAAMI spec. Powder used was H322. At this speed straight wheelweight material worked fine at woods ranges.

    I am not concerned so much with exit hole diameter as I am with internal organ damage. Such damage should be and is greatly in excess of what is seen when handguns firing cast or jacketed bullets in the 1300 fps vicinity are used.

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    I know Larry is always right so I casted up 7.2 pounds of 50/50 pure and COWW plies 2% pewter today. Started this morning and finished about supper time. I was impressed that 37 of the boolits weighed from 196.0 to 196.9 and all the rest weighed 197.0 to 197.9! I think I counted 197 of the 197 grain boolots I casted...how’s that for a coincidence! I’m liking this mold! This MP is my favorite mold by far. I figured this alloy will hold up better at faster speeds in my 35 whelen. I’ll test both alloys at 35 Remington j word velocities and see which one groups best.






    The 196er’s are purple and the 197’s are clear.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-19-2020 at 10:31 AM.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    Tested both alloys today with my lee tester. My 16:1 measured .80” with two different marks I made and the 50/50 measured .70” twice. So 10.4 BH on my 50/50 and. My lee chart didn’t go below .79” which my lee chart said was 8 BH so I’m guessing my 16:1 is around 7.8 BH.

    50/50 on the left and 16:1 on the right.


    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-21-2020 at 05:46 PM.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,537
    Finally tried out my two HP alloys today I my marlin 336 chambered in 35 Remington. The only powder I tried both with was Varget. About 5 loads each in a ladder test. 50/50 prevailed today with 40 grains of Varget. The top group is at 100 yards with it. The group below was with 36.2 grains of imr3031 and the lee.



    My best group with the softer 16:1 with a 7.8 BH measured 2” at 100 yards. The first two shots landed in the same hole and the third land 2” away from the other two. Zero leading.


    I’m sure either either alloy will put one heck of a smack down on a deer.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check