RotoMetals2WidenersInline FabricationMidSouth Shooters Supply
RepackboxLee PrecisionADvertise hereTitan Reloading

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 37 of 37

Thread: 222 Remington versus 223 Remington - why one over the other?

  1. #21
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northwest Ohio
    Posts
    11,372
    In off the shelf factory rifles I dont think you will see much difference accuracy wise. In a accuracy built custom rifle I think the 222 will win by a little bit. I have had 222s in bolt actions that were real tack drivers. First rifle was a savage 110 in 222 I used full power jacketed for varmints and a lead 55 grn loaded down for squirrels. It was a moa rifle. I have shot 223 in HP matches ARs built for accuracy with fast twist barrels to use 75 and 80 grn bullets again very accurate barrels and the slightly larger volume helps with the heavier bullets. Both can and are very accurate. As has been said for many years the 222 held a lot of records. Its a nice mild mannered round with easy recoil and muzzle blast. They normally shoot very well.

  2. #22
    Boolit Master uscra112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Switzerland of Ohio
    Posts
    3,330
    Quote Originally Posted by country gent View Post
    In off the shelf factory rifles I dont think you will see much difference accuracy wise. In a accuracy built custom rifle I think the 222 will win by a little bit. I have had 222s in bolt actions that were real tack drivers. First rifle was a savage 110 in 222 I used full power jacketed for varmints and a lead 55 grn loaded down for squirrels. It was a moa rifle. I have shot 223 in HP matches ARs built for accuracy with fast twist barrels to use 75 and 80 grn bullets again very accurate barrels and the slightly larger volume helps with the heavier bullets. Both can and are very accurate. As has been said for many years the 222 held a lot of records. Its a nice mild mannered round with easy recoil and muzzle blast. They normally shoot very well.
    You said it. For a while in the 1950s the .222 was a primo benchrest cartridge. The .223 never has been.

    I've always liked that long neck, which is more friendly to cast bullets.
    flectere si nequeo superos, acheronta movebo

  3. #23
    Boolit Master Harter66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    90 miles North of Texarkana 9 miles from OK in the green hell
    Posts
    4,463
    I had boring 198? vintage Savage 340 . I shot Rem , FC , Win , and Hornady 50 gr SP , nickle groups at 100 . 4/5 touching the 5th went a little wild but was well within the 1" grid with a 62gr NOE 225-55 at 2640 fps over 19 gr of H322 . 1-12" twist .

    223 same everything cast in a Savage Axis and Stevens 200 both with 1-8" shot about 2" on 20 gr and only 2130 fps before groups completely fell apart . Same results in 3 ARs with both A2 and M4 profiles in 1-8" twists .

    Final impressions the 222 delivered better results with cast , going faster on less powder but I expect results would be a dead heat with equal twists and the only advantage being burning less powder .
    In the time of darkest defeat,our victory may be nearest. Wm. McKinley.

    I was young and stupid then I'm older now. Me 1992 .

    Richard Lee Hart 6/29/39-7/25/18


    Without trial we cannot learn and grow . It is through our stuggles that we become stronger .
    Brother I'm going to be Pythagerus , DiVinci , and Atlas all rolled into one soon .

  4. #24
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,295
    Harter66, what was the alloy used? I have a nice Sako L46 in 222, with a 1 in16, bet it will shoot that load as well. Shoots the old 19.5 4198 and a 50 like it thinks it's a bench gun, but I want a cast load. Just gotta get rountuit, kinda back burner for now.
    “You don’t practice until you get it right. You practice until you can’t get it wrong.” Jason Elam, All-Pro kicker, Denver Broncos

  5. #25
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Western Washington
    Posts
    20
    Im a fan of the triple duece. The advantage of the 223 would be off the shelf availability

  6. #26
    Boolit Master
    GOPHER SLAYER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cherry Valley ,Ca.
    Posts
    2,181
    One of my regrets over the one that got away was a beautiful Sako L46 Vixen in 222. Great rifle, great cartridge. In the caliber .22 they should have quit right there. I have owned several hot 22s like 219 Zipper improved, .219 Donaldson and a .225 Winchester which I still have. All too loud and and in my opinion not needed. That's my opinion and I am sticking to it.
    A GUN THAT'S COCKED AND UNLOADED AIN'T GOOD FOR NUTHIN'........... ROOSTER COGBURN

  7. #27
    Moderator Emeritus


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SW Montana
    Posts
    10,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Gewehr-Guy View Post
    Somewhere I read a comment that the good old 30-06 was a perfectly proportioned and balanced cartridge, and that Browning scaled the dimensions up to make the .50 BMG cartridge, and if you study the .222 Rem it appears to be just a small 30-06 case!
    Mike Walker of Remington scaled down the 30-06 to create the 222. It has been the basis of the 223, 222 mag, 17 Rem, 221, 17 Fireball, 300 BO and a whole bunch of other wildcats, esp the TCU contender cartridges.
    [The Montana Gianni] Front sight and squeeze

  8. #28
    Boolit Master Drm50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    SE Ohio
    Posts
    1,608
    There would be no 223/ 5.56 if the long neck on 222 lent itself to full auto weapons. The 222 is one of those classics that would still be popular except the 223 and ARs have taken over. I don’t think there is enough difference in the two to make much difference. I do think 222 is more accurate on average because of the long neck.

  9. #29
    Boolit Buddy Rapidrob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    131
    I had the honor of knowing the first man in NRA history who fired five shots into the same hole at 200 yards in the 50's using the .222 Remington cartridge.
    My wife's go-to rifle for varmint hunting is a .222 Remington Riihimaki Sako. It is one fine shooting rifle at long range.
    When the U.S Army was looking for a new cartridge they knew the accuracy of the .222 Remington but it lacked the ability to penetrate a helmet at long distance ( 500 yards ) so working with Stoner/Remington the cartridge developed was the .222 Special *which could do he job. It was later ( in 1959 ) renamed to the .223 Remington. The rest is history.
    *The other cartridges tested were:
    .224 Winchester
    .224 Springfield
    The .222 special was designed in part by Remington working with Stoner.
    With that being said, the .222 Remington with its longer neck is more accurate but for a military cartridge the .223 has the longer range wanted by the U.S Army and is almost as accurate.
    While the .222 Remington can be loaded to a much higher pressure to achieve the penetration needed by the Army, pressures were deemed to be too high to be safe in combat conditions.

  10. #30
    Boolit Buddy OldBearHair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Conroe TEXAS
    Posts
    476
    Did anyone mention what the limits are for feet per second with cast boolits without gas checks and boolits with gas checks for the 222 Remington?

  11. #31
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    296
    Now you got me going to get my L46 action Marlin 322 Heavy Barrel rifle out
    of the back of the safe and "exercise it" again. The Marlin microgroove crapped out at under 1K rounds
    on PDs in South Dakota, rebarrelled with Douglas Premium 12 twist barrel. Great gun. Shot very well with Hornady 55SX.
    Looking at lead bullets for it.
    Now, OTOH, I since had built up a rifle with Savage 110LH single shot action with a Douglas Premium 12 twist,
    Herters TargVar stock. Caliber 223. This rifle, with same 55SX bullets would do 0.4" groups at 100yds
    Of course higher velocity than the ol L46 222. Did PDs with the 223 way out there.
    Again, I am looking now at the L46 Marlin322 and do some lead bullet work with it.
    beltfed/arnie

  12. #32
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    296
    Oh, interestingly, my Marlin 322 was purchased from Klein's Sporting Goods back in 1958 by
    a good friend $88 as I recall. He mostly shot 22 cal pellets /primed only cases in his basement with it. We were in high school at the time.
    I shot as said, I shot out the microgroove barrel on PDs in S.D. they were known to have short life in 222R. and had to rebarrel it.
    beltfed/arnie
    Last edited by beltfed; 03-24-2020 at 06:17 PM. Reason: add a note.

  13. #33
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    175
    I don't think you can go wrong with either one.
    I like the .223 simply because it is a military cartridge.

  14. #34
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    175
    Correction, .556 minor different but it is there.

  15. #35
    Boolit Master dh2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ft.Bragg,NC
    Posts
    598
    I have nothing against the 222 but being around Army bases for the last 30 years made the choice for me 223 brass is in good availability I have had a bolt action 223 that has done most of my varmint hunting , and now AR-15 , so to me that takes away the appeal of the 222 for me, I have in resent years got a 220 Swift and built a 22-250 Rem. AI but still feel 90% of varmint hunting shoots can be done with the 223 and I have not found a place in the world that ammo was not available

  16. #36
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moorhead, MN
    Posts
    327
    At the range where I volunteer, the 223 is favored by those who want brass that's easy to find and once fired brass is cheap. But even they describe the 222 as inherently more accurate. "You have to work at it to make a 222 inaccurate." is commonly heard when the two cartridges are compared.
    I'm a varmint shooter, so I have a pair of 22-250's.

  17. #37
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    6,297
    With bullets from 50-55 grains from twenty years ago the .223 had the slight edge in range and power, the .222 had the edge in accuracy. With modern bullets of 55+ grains, the .223 with its quicker available twist is the way to go.

    I have had a few rifles in both calibers, honestly for field use I could never see any difference in performance. As for coyotes at 400+ yards, that is .22-250 (or bigger) territory not .223 to me.

    With all that said, I had a Remington Model 788 in .222 Remington that would put five shots under a nickel at 150 yards prone with sling, on demand (I could see pretty good in my younger years). I wish I still had that rifle, everything I shot at that had fur just died. I replaced it with a 788 in .223, it never shot as well as the deuce. Not that it was a poor shooter, it just didn't measure up to the .222.

    Robert

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check