Titan ReloadingLee PrecisionSnyders JerkyMidSouth Shooters Supply
RepackboxLoad DataReloading EverythingRotoMetals2
Inline Fabrication Wideners
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Win 244 Powder

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    catmandu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Central Mississippi
    Posts
    349

    Win 244 Powder

    Has anybody tried Winchester 244 powder? It’s 31 on the Burn Rate Chart, a bit slower than W231 (29) and right above Unique (32). so it would seem to be a very useful choice, Unique is hard to find lately and W244 meters as good as W231 and it has the clean burning additive.

    So has anybody tried it? What do you think of it?

    Paul in WNY
    Think you can, or think you can't. Either way your right.

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master
    rintinglen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Orange, VA NOW
    Posts
    6,518
    I am a little perplexed by he published data. Some cartridges, it is slower than WW-231. others faster. Take a look at the 9mm luger 125 grain loads. No rhyme nor reason that I can see. In the 327 Federal, 244 seems to be definitely slower. In the 32 S&W long, it's faster.
    Moving up the line, in the 45 ACP with a 230 grain LRN, ,4 grains less of a max charge of 244 is faster than the max 231 load. But with a 230 grn. jacketed bullet, it takes .3 grains more 244 than WW-231 to achieve the same result. In the 38 Special +P, it seems much faster than HP-38 (231's identical twin) with the 158 grain bullet, but slower than its running mate when the bullet weight drops to 125 grains.

    I have used 231 for 30+ years and have a god idea what to expect from it. I clean my guns, I shoot mostly lead, and the range closes at sunset: I see nothing to tempt me away from my current path,
    Last edited by rintinglen; 07-02-2020 at 10:42 AM. Reason: additional info.
    _________________________________________________It's not that I can't spell: it is that I can't type.

  3. #3
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    184
    I also looked at a bunch of different loads, comparing 231, 244 and also Universal. The one thing that came through with consistency is that 244 is more energetic than 231. Whether it took more or less powder to reach an equivalent pressure, the fps per grain was higher with 244, so it would be slightly more cost effective. My experience with 231/HP38 is that a decent amount of pressure is needed for it to burn clean. I'd be interested to see how 244 compared in that consideration.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master


    Burnt Fingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Tejas
    Posts
    1,938
    It's supposed to be the "NEW" 231, I've tried it in 9mm and 45 ACP, ho hum. Just another powder with nothing special to recommend it.
    NRA Benefactor.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    OKC , Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,384
    Another powder close to Unique burn rate that flows well in measures is Alliant be-86 I use it quite a bit and is easier to find around here when powder is hard to find , it sounds similar to Winchester 244 which I have not used

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check