MidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersReloading EverythingRepackbox
Inline FabricationLoad DataLee PrecisionRotoMetals2
Titan Reloading
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Why are HBWC boolits accurate?

  1. #1
    Boolit Master

    fatelvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Mokena, IL
    Posts
    759

    Why are HBWC boolits accurate?

    Maybe I am overthinking this too much, but:
    For years I have been hearing that HBWC boolits have been used with tremendously accurate results. To me, it is hard to understand how a bullet that doesn’t start out in a properly fitted throat, which I have been told is necessary for good accuracy, can produce such fine accuracy. Is it the fact that it is seated so deeply in the case, producing a higher Powder Fill percentage, offset the throat situation? Thanks for any input guys.
    I shoot so that I can handload.

  2. #2
    Moderator


    Winger Ed.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Just outside Gun Barrel City, Texas
    Posts
    9,492
    I think the hollow sides/base compresses or flares out and fits different barrel diameters better, there by making it more forgiving,
    and the long bearing surface stabilizes easily at the slower speeds.

    Solid/double end wad cutters can be very, very accurate also, but they want to be sized properly for the gun.
    If solid wadcutters are on the small side for a barrel, they may not 'squish' to expand enough at the lower pressures to fit well.
    In school: We learn lessons, and are given tests.
    In life: We are given tests, and learn lessons.


    OK People. Enough of this idle chit-chat.
    This ain't your Grandma's sewing circle.
    EVERYONE!
    Back to your oars. The Captain wants to waterski.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado
    Posts
    2,085
    First of all, the cylinder throats center the projectile to enter the forcing cone concentrically and make it's way down the bore. The hollow base expands to seal the chamber and bore so that even low pressure loads could get a good seal. Lastly, the boolit is weight forward with kind of a shuttle-cock effect.

    When I left the academy, our duty round was the FBI load of 158 HP semi-wadcutter, but our qualification rounds were factory HB wadcutters. Some years later they had us qualify with duty rounds, surely some scheme by the manufacturers to sell more expensive ammo for training.

    Before we switched to G22 40 S&W we were using 130 gr HP +p loads, still expensive. When I was the training manager, I had to buy the ammo. 9mm and 40 was cheaper than 38 SP as few agencies still used wheel guns. We got G22s in a one for one trade with a distributor so the only expense was 16 hours of transition training nd a case of ammo per Officer.

    Retired now, don't have to worry about such things any longer. I had been tempted to get a wadcutter mold but don't see the point. However, back in the day there were more than a few Officers who shot PPC and those race guns shot the HB wadcutters like nobody's business. Surplus revolvers, tapered bbl models from the 1950s, were often available for $75 and with new internals and a PPC bbl, they could be quite affordable - compared to race guns built on new frames.
    Last edited by fcvan; 11-30-2019 at 02:53 PM.
    Common sense Gun Safety . . .

    Is taught at the Range!

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    StuBach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,135
    For what it’s worth, factory Vintage Remington wadcutters all contained HBWC bullets. I had an old vintage box and pulled one once to find out.

    Miha produced a HB version of the classic Hensley and Gibbs #50 and they shoot amazing in my S&W k357 and k38 masterpiece.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    Quote Originally Posted by fcvan View Post
    First of all, the cylinder throats center the projectile to enter the forcing cone concentrically and make it's waay down the bore. The hollow base expands to seal the chamber and bore so that even low pressure loads could get a good seal. Lastly, the boolit is weight forward with ind of a shuttle-cock effect..............
    /\ You covered it well right there /\


  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    Long bearing surface
    The weight forward "shuttle cock" effect. (works at short range, becomes a determent out beyond 50 yards)
    The ability to get a good seal at low pressures due to the skirt sealing the bore.
    Not really an accuracy issue but the full wadcutter design does take the maximum advantage of the scoring rules by cutting clean holes in the target.

    So, in a nutshell; the HBWC is more of a combination of desirable traits for target shooting than it is an inherently accurate bullet. Of course, in addition to all of those traits, it is also an accurate bullet. So maybe it is the sum of all of those qualities that makes it great.

  7. #7
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    8,906
    A number of factors at play. First the design works. But also bear in mind it is a bullet that is shot in guns that are inherently accurate.

    I shot 10's of thousands of solid H&G #50 BB bullets and in extensive testing found that the difference (bewteen the H&G 50 and the Remington 148 HBWC) was less than 1" at 50 yards for 50 shot groups. I do not know how much of that difference was due to the HB, or soft alloy used for swaging, or the higher consistency of swaged bullets.

    In most cases the issue is moot. For hunting and defensive loads, reliable feeding trumps a minimal improvement in accuracy. My M52 was reliable but it was not a cheap gun. And magazines were not thrown around and dropped. A blunt nose bullets will be more prone to feeding hiccups.
    Don Verna


  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Here is an excellent article on wadcutters by one of the experts in the field, Ed Harris

    https://www.hensleygibbs.com/edharri...adcutterQA.htm

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master

    mdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    So. Orygun
    Posts
    7,239
    Quote Originally Posted by Petrol & Powder View Post
    Long bearing surface
    The weight forward "shuttle cock" effect. (works at short range, becomes a determent out beyond 50 yards)
    The ability to get a good seal at low pressures due to the skirt sealing the bore.
    Not really an accuracy issue but the full wadcutter design does take the maximum advantage of the scoring rules by cutting clean holes in the target.

    So, in a nutshell; the HBWC is more of a combination of desirable traits for target shooting than it is an inherently accurate bullet. Of course, in addition to all of those traits, it is also an accurate bullet. So maybe it is the sum of all of those qualities that makes it great.
    Yep, that's it. As for the deep seated pressure; does not apply, most HBWC are loaded to very light pressures...
    My Anchor is holding fast!

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    England,Ar
    Posts
    7,691
    Accuracy is pretty much what a HBWC was designed for. They made and broke a lot of records in the Bullseye game over the years. You just don't want to load them too hot.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master


    HangFireW8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Maryland
    Posts
    2,587
    Quote Originally Posted by fatelvis View Post
    Maybe I am overthinking this too much, but:
    For years I have been hearing that HBWC boolits have been used with tremendously accurate results. To me, it is hard to understand how a bullet that doesn’t start out in a properly fitted throat, which I have been told is necessary for good accuracy, can produce such fine accuracy.
    Could it be? There are more ways to find accuracy than preached by the Cult of the Ball Seat? Will such heresy be allowed on this board?
    I give loading advice based on my actual results in factory rifles with standard chambers, twist rates and basic accurizing.
    My goals for using cast boolits are lots of good, cheap, and reasonably accurate shooting, while avoiding overly tedious loading processes.
    The BHN Deformation Formula, and why I don't use it.
    How to find and fix sizing die eccentricity problems.
    Do you trust your casting thermometer?
    A few musings.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    OKC , Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,384
    Quote Originally Posted by fatelvis View Post
    Maybe I am overthinking this too much, but:
    For years I have been hearing that HBWC boolits have been used with tremendously accurate results. To me, it is hard to understand how a bullet that doesn’t start out in a properly fitted throat, which I have been told is necessary for good accuracy, can produce such fine accuracy. Is it the fact that it is seated so deeply in the case, producing a higher Powder Fill percentage, offset the throat situation? Thanks for any input guys.
    a hollow base bullet on the correct charge of powder will adjust itself to fit the throats within reason.
    its old style technology in action , just like a civil war mini ball in a musket

  13. #13
    Boolit Master


    Walks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    3,028
    My Dad used HBWC's cast from a pair of Lyman #358395 molds back in the 1950's- 1960's for Bullseye Shooting. Used Foundry 20/1 Lead. He dropped from one mold from the left side of the Pot and one from the right. Used match REM Brass & 2.8grs of Bullseye.
    Used a Colt Officers Model Match for .38Spl, He was one Fine Pistol Shot.

    I could never cast HBWC's to match His, so I just went with Hornady Swaged HBWC in my S&W M14. Could never get close to His group size. Best I ever did was 1 1/4" at 25yrds, and that was only once. Dad did one hole groups of about an inch or better all day long.

    Accurate, I can't give you a definitive answer. They just are. It's like other's have said, the skirts expand to seal the chamber and bbl. Only thing I can think of.
    Last edited by Walks; 12-01-2019 at 06:01 PM. Reason: Forgot something
    I HATE auto-correct

    Happiness is a Warm GUN & more ammo to shoot in it.

    My Experience and My Opinion, are just that, Mine.

    SASS #375 Life

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master Tatume's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    5,574
    The advantage of HBWC bullets in Bullseye competition is that they can be loaded with very light charges. Recoil can be reduced to very low levels, which provides an advantage in rapid fire strings. Accuracy needs to be sufficient to hold the ten ring at 25 yards.

    The alternative for revolver shooters is to shoot the 32 S&W Long cartridge, which is the equal of the 38 Special in 25 yard rapid fire strings. However, the 38 special can be loaded with 158 gr RN bullets for the fifty yard slow fire strings, and may be more accurate at fifty yards than the 32. Charlie Green Frog could comment on this. Charlie can also comment on how difficult it is to acquire a S&W 32 Long revolver in modern times.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Capital Region NY
    Posts
    680
    Winger got it, When the hbwc crushes in the bore, there are no extended fins on the base like a solid, the hbwc is perfectly symmetrical. The drum head can crush without accuracy loss. If you want even better precision, push them through a swage to tru up the base. Sometimes this can be accomplished by simply sizing it so the base cleans up. Smith model 52s were notorious for poor precision with cast because the groove was true 9mm and the hbwc could take the crush.

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Central VA
    Posts
    5,515
    I have ZERO personal experience with the 32 S&W in a semiauto. I spoke recently with a gunsmith who does work for the military pistol and rifle teams, and he said he had been busy recently making 32 ACP chambered barrels for 32 semiauto target guns for the teams. I never saw one, but that’s the story I got.

    I shot just about a bajillion HBWC s in the old PPC league I was in, along with a smaller number of solid DEWCs. From what I could see in that game (and with my admittedly limited skills) there didn’t seem to be a noticeable difference between the two for that application.

    Froggie
    "It aint easy being green!"

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Petander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    2,602
    Quote Originally Posted by dverna View Post
    A number of factors at play. First the design works. But also bear in mind it is a bullet that is shot in guns that are inherently accurate.

    I shot 10's of thousands of solid H&G #50 BB bullets and in extensive testing found that the difference (bewteen the H&G 50 and the Remington 148 HBWC) was less than 1" at 50 yards for 50 shot groups. I do not know how much of that difference was due to the HB, or soft alloy used for swaging, or the higher consistency of swaged bullets.

    In most cases the issue is moot.

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master

    gwpercle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Posts
    9,254
    I have no idea ! Also don't know why 2.7 (+/- 1 grain) is the secrete recipe for accuracy in a 38 special .
    It's just Magic !
    Don't question it... just load, shoot and enjoy the Magicalness of it !
    Gary
    Certified Cajun
    Proud Member of The Basket of Deplorables
    " Let's Go Brandon !"

  19. #19
    Boolit Master

    fatelvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Mokena, IL
    Posts
    759
    I’ve read somewhere that now, because of different formulation of Bullseye, you should use 3.0 grains.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I shoot so that I can handload.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by fatelvis View Post
    I’ve read somewhere that now, because of different formulation of Bullseye, you should use 3.0 grains.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Ed Harris reports that data about Bullseye in the link I posted previously. I don't have any old powder to compare the new stuff to.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check