Back in the days before internet; long distance gun sales generally involved a printed catalog (like Shotgun News) and a small scale FFL dealer to handle the transfer. A 3 year FFL was $90 if my memory is correct and the dealer could operate out of his residence without really upsetting anyone. The transaction was set up by a phone (a landline ) OR you mailed your order along with your payment.
Times have changed and the orders are predominately handled on-line, the payment may be a digital transfer of funds and the FFL is more likely to be a full time firearms dealer with a dedicated store front.
I got to thinking about the firearms I've purchased in person verses the ones I've purchased sight unseen. I'm not sure what the breakdown is between those methods but as I pondered it, I realized that overall, the long distance purchases have been very favorable for me.
I have a personal rule that I will not risk more money than I'm willing to lose but I've had remarkably good outcomes with long distance purchases. I'm careful and I research the sellers before I commit. Most of my long distance purchases have been for very specific used guns that either were not available locally or were too expensive locally.
While it's always nice to be able to examine the gun before you put your money down, the internet has made the transmission of high quality photographs very easy. I think that is one of the factors that boosts buyer confidence.
Whenever you purchase a gun long distance, you MUST take the cost of shipping and the transfer fee (if it applies) into consideration. However, even with those additional costs, you can often get a good deal.
I would like to thank the honest dealers out there and ask if anyone has had bad experiences with long distance purchases.