Titan ReloadingLoad DataWidenersInline Fabrication
Reloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters SupplyRepackboxRotoMetals2
Snyders Jerky Lee Precision
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: Any thoughts about the Lee Lead Hardness test kit?

  1. #21
    Boolit Master



    retread's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Payson Arizona
    Posts
    1,344
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    I use the Lee BHN Tester all the time and find it easy and simple to use. I did mount the scope in a "toy" microscope which makes for quick and accurate measurements.

    Attachment 247115

    Attachment 247116

    Attachment 247117
    Great idea Larry, I think I will be hunting for a microscope. Thanks!

  2. #22
    Boolit Buddy hermans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    At the Southern most tip of Africa
    Posts
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by bangerjim View Post
    I have one and have not used it since I bought my CabineTree-style tester several years ago. The CT tester is VERY accurate, easy to use, works on any shape of sample, is totally portable (take to junk yard!), very fast, and not hard on my eyes like that silly little microscope thingy.

    Buy what you can afford, but spend more than you feel you should, as you will have it for a long time!!!!!

    Good luck!

    bangerjim
    What he says!
    The Cabine Tree tester is now sold by Buffalo Arms, and yes it is $30 more, but there is no comparison between the two. So if you like to get accurate readings from the start without any hassle, get the Cabine Tree type, it will last you a lifetime!

  3. #23
    Boolit Master
    kens's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    coastal Ga
    Posts
    1,133
    Well, if you got a BHN tester, and you get your alloy at your targeted hardness,
    then how do you know if it is hard with tin or with antimoney?

    What if you test a unknown batch, then how do you tell it is hard with antimoney or tin?
    How can you tell if it is not babbit?

  4. #24
    Boolit Master

    Rcmaveric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    2,356
    Quote Originally Posted by kens View Post
    Well, if you got a BHN tester, and you get your alloy at your targeted hardness,
    then how do you know if it is hard with tin or with antimoney?

    What if you test a unknown batch, then how do you tell it is hard with antimoney or tin?
    How can you tell if it is not babbit?
    You dont unless you get it tested. Most sources will a known range.

    Like range scrap or anything swaged wont have tin and will be hardened with antimony. Antimony helps with swaging process.

    Wheel weights have range of knowns. So you guesstimate. Just sort them.

    Babets, you can get a chart from roto metals. Its guess though unless you know what your talking about. Doubt most of us can pick it out at a junk yard, i know i cant.

    Pewter is mostly tin as are lead pipe joints.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far."
    ~Theodore Roosevelt~

  5. #25
    Boolit Master mehavey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,540
    And if you really want a neat toy combo of impression maker/measurement whose accuracy is the cat's meow . . .
    https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...26&postcount=7

  6. #26
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    The Lee hardness tester is as accurate as it gets
    Do not let its price fool you

    "The Lee tester appeared to produce the most readings that were both consistent and closest to the actual laboratory results. Although individually other testers came in with slightly smaller standard deviations and numbers that came in closer to calibrated equipment, the Lee appeared to have the best combination between the two areas."

    This makes sense based on the design.

    http://www.lasc.us/Shay-BHN-Tester-Experiment.htm
    Last edited by jmort; 08-23-2019 at 08:10 AM.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Casa Grande, AZ
    Posts
    5,526
    Quote Originally Posted by bangerjim View Post
    I have one and have not used it since I bought my CabineTree-style tester several years ago. The CT tester is VERY accurate, easy to use, works on any shape of sample, is totally portable (take to junk yard!), very fast, and not hard on my eyes like that silly little microscope thingy.

    Buy what you can afford, but spend more than you feel you should, as you will have it for a long time!!!!!

    Good luck!

    bangerjim
    I will have to agree here. I did some research of different brands per an article floating around. I used the Lee that a friend has and found it less than user friendly. The Cabine Tree unit is very fast to use and accurate no fuss no muss.
    You can check a number of bullets in less than a minutes time. Try doing that with the Lee. Granted if you want a bargain and your pinching penny's the Lee will get you there eventually.

  8. #28
    Boolit Buddy
    Jeff R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    East central Minnesota. I can see Wisconsin from my house!!!
    Posts
    161
    I like my Lee Hardness Tester. When I finish a casting session and have reloaded the pot, I make a puck of the contents and then take it down to the Bunker and do a hardness test on it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pucks.jpg.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	39.8 KB 
ID:	247146

    On my next trip out to the Men's Crisis Center, I toss the latest puck into the pot. That way, when I start the next casting session, I know the BHN if what's in the pot.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pot.jpg.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	56.6 KB 
ID:	247147

    To make the puck, I ladle lead into my little Lee dipper. I do this in several layers. If you fill the dipper all at once, shrinkage on cooling makes a dip in the surface that makes it harder to get a good reading.

    Jeff

    Rocketing towards 200 posts!
    Before you criticize another man, you should walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you criticize him, you'll be a mile away from him, . . . and you'll have his shoes.

  9. #29
    Boolit Master trapper9260's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,415
    I have one and happy with it and from what I found it works just as good for then any other for me that I check out. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN0125[1].JPG 
Views:	38 
Size:	45.4 KB 
ID:	247153 this is my set up I made .Works for me.
    Life Member of NRA,NTA,DAV ,ITA. Also member of FTA,CBA

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,409
    I do like Larry G does but with a DIY wood frame, not a fancy microscope stand. If you don't have/make a stand of some sort you will not be happy with it.

    a more complete hardness chart


    I use pencils for most of my testing although I do like my lee tester

  11. #31
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Allegan Michigan
    Posts
    8
    I had a Lee tester for quite a while. Yes it worked good for what it is. It just was not fast enough for what i wanted to do after a year or two. I bought a Cabin Tree and never looked back. I gave the Lee tester and a spare mold to a friend that is just getting into casting. For what he is doing it works great.

  12. #32
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,326
    Quote Originally Posted by retread View Post
    Great idea Larry, I think I will be hunting for a microscope. Thanks!
    I found mine in a second hand/antique store and have seen others since. Got it for less than $15 if I remember right. Took the lens out and drilled one hole in the bottom for the scope to fit through. Then wrapped the scope with duct tape to a tight fit inside the micro-scope body. Modeling clay is used on the piece of soda case cardboard to hold the bullet. It is quick, easy and very accurate.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  13. #33
    Moderator

    W.R.Buchanan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ojai CA
    Posts
    9,883
    I have been using one of these for many years. I don't use the little micro scope with mine as I have a Full on Nikon 6C Optical Comparator in my shop with a digital readout that goes down to 10 millionths of an inch. With this tool I can interpolate down to . single Bhn digits using the Lee Chart. IE: .1 Bhn

    The issue with using this tool is being able to get a repeatable measurement. You must hold the scope solidly which requires a mechanical holder of some type. I have seen many good ideas here at Cast Boolits.

    The actual Penetrator is a first class piece of tooling and I get perfectly repeatable results easily by setting my press up so it goes over center when the plunger is flush with the top of the tool, or in the case of my Hand Presses, the handles bottom out on the upper plate thus insuring that the plunger goes to the same depth every time.

    I simply test on the Flat Nose of any given boolit, as pretty much all of mine are flat nosed.

    IMHO these tools are by far the most Accurate, Repeatable and "Best Made Tools" for this purpose available to the home caster. All you've got to do is hold the scope steady to get good results.

    Maybe some one could do a Sticky that had all the different designs of scope holders I've seen here over the years. There's something for just about everybody.

    Randy
    "It's not how well you do what you know how to do,,,It's how well you do what you DON'T know how to do!"
    www.buchananprecisionmachine.com

  14. #34
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,876
    Quote Originally Posted by W.R.Buchanan View Post
    SNIP...

    IMHO these [Lee] tools are by far the most Accurate, Repeatable and "Best Made Tools" for this purpose available to the home caster. All you've got to do is hold the scope steady to get good results.

    Maybe some one could do a Sticky that had all the different designs of scope holders I've seen here over the years. There's something for just about everybody.

    Randy
    A sticky is a great idea. I made this post a few years ago (I just made it a sticky today due to this suggestion).
    Maybe everyone can add their design to it?
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...20x-Microscope
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  15. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,409
    scrap wood I don't use the groove I cut, I file a flat spot on the nose of the boolit, stick it to a small, flat something to move around easily and lower the scope until in focus





  16. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,409
    I like this solution, anyone can build this
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...=1#post3766084

  17. #37
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    4,553
    If you are shopping for one try reading this comparison.

    http://www.lasc.us/Shay-BHN-Tester-Experiment.htm

  18. #38
    Moderator
    RogerDat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Michigan Lansing Area
    Posts
    5,754
    Larger batches testing so you know the alloy and can calculate the hardness should work. You know the ingredients, you know the BHN close enough for a government job. Smaller batches it really doesn't matter too much why the alloy has a specific BHN reading you just care that it is hard enough for the use intended. That is where I think the hardness tester would be most useful.

    I like the idea of a tester easy enough to haul along to a scrap yard. Accurate hardness could provide some useful information when purchasing. Should be a marked difference between something with a couple percent antimony and plain soft lead. Something harder could have say zinc but if the BHN is a dead on match for linotype then.... So portable and accurate would be nice. I use a harbor freight prick punch, spring loaded so the force is repeatable. Have hit known lead alloys so have an idea of dimple size for know alloys. Not super accurate but enough to give me a clue if it is "too hard" or dead soft or probably close to WW lead. More than once have come across lead in bullet caster ingots. Nice to get a feel for what they are before buying.
    Scrap.... because all the really pithy and emphatic four letter words were taken and we had to describe this source of casting material somehow so we added an "S" to what non casters and wives call what we collect.

    Kind of hard to claim to love America while one is hating half the Americans that disagree with you. One nation indivisible requires work.

    Feedback page http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...light=RogerDat

  19. #39
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,426
    Works fine ,have used one for 10-12 yrs . I use it strictly as a bench mark soft is BHN 8 for me/ 10-11 is about 1-20 /13-14 is pushing 1-16 and it is consistent year to year and some one else who has a Cabin tree testers shows a different BHN#but it always corresponds to my hardness #,all I need/Ed

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check