Titan ReloadingInline FabricationLoad DataRepackbox
Reloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersLee Precision
Snyders Jerky RotoMetals2
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: How homogeneous is an alloy?

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Alaska, the last frontier
    Posts
    239

    How homogeneous is an alloy?

    I have been dabbling on testing an alloy strength with pencils. Now i just picked a Lee tester which I'm sure will provide me with hours of fun refining my ability to measure and testing different theories. As I was greeting into setting my samples I was wondering; how homogeneous is a homemade alloy? Say we grab some wheel weighs, measure some shotgun shot for added antimony, add some tin for better flow and to combat brittleness, flux and mix here and there; at the end of the day how even is the alloy from first ingot/bullet to the last one cast an hour later? Would the different metals have a tendency while on the pot to float out of solution into a separate layer? How about when they cool on the ingot? I know you shouldn't test the top but how much precipitation happens that renders the bottom significantly different than the middle, or sides, or top?

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,581
    Would the different metals have a tendency while on the pot to float out of solution into a separate layer? Depends on temp of the mix. Tin will float to the top until all the metals are in the liquidus zone. At the cooling zone (thin layer) the % of an additive will vary but it stabilizes. It is recommended to NOT test ingots. For our purposes, no-one has shown the alloy changes from the first to the end of the pouring session.
    Whatever!

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    How homogeneous is an alloy? = Very

    The metal doesn't separate out when melted.


    The following is from Glen Fryxell's, "From Ingot to Target, A Cast Bullet Guide for Handgunners" (chapter 8) :
    "Gravity segregation. Some folks like to think that if you don’t stir your lead pot, the components will separate according to their differing densities. Nope. They’re all soluble in the melt and Brownian motion insures that they stay well mixed. No gravity segregation will take place in your lead pot. A little test you can perform for yourself at home: dissolve a teaspoon of salt in a glass of water. Stir it thoroughly and set it aside overnight. Table salt is over twice as dense as water (just like lead is approximately twice as dense as either antimony or tin). If homogenous solutions spontaneously gravity segregated, then this one would do so just like the hypothetical segregating lead alloys. Let this salt-water stand undisturbed over night, then carefully remove a spoonful from the surface of the glass and taste it, is there still salt in that surface water?"

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    Hick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Winnemucca, NV
    Posts
    1,606
    In addition to what Petrol and Powder says, Antimony and Tin form a complex (SbSn, like a molecule) which is very soluble in lead.
    Hick: Iron sights!

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,669
    Technically speaking, if you have oxidation on the surface of the melt and skim it off rather than reducing it back in, you are removing the component metals from the pot, and since the rate of oxidation varies with the metal, there may be a very, very small change in composition towards the end if you are repeatedly removing dross instead of using a cover layer. Practically, it a very minor effect - if I remember correctly, BNE actually analyzed first and last pours for changes and didn't measure any.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master quail4jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    The North Woods of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    544
    That oxidation on the surface at high temperatures is tin which, if skimmed off, will affect the composition of the alloy and is one of the challenges we face in order to keep our alloy consistent while casting. It can be kept in the alloy by reduction using a lipid (I like beeswax) and kept from oxidizing with flux (I like sawdust). There are few things more beautiful than the shining surface of a beloved alloy peering through a top layer of charring sawdust! Brings me to tears of joy just to think of it! So...no, not all alloys under all circumstances are homogeneous but we take action to optimize consistency. Read Glenn Fryxell's articles especially the one about the Sn/Sb system and saturation, best of luck!

  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Alaska, the last frontier
    Posts
    239
    The oxidation may be tin but how significant can that be? I mean, on a 10 pound pot I could have 6 ounces of tin. What's the weight of that tin stain on the top of the molten alloy? A few grains?

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    Quote Originally Posted by Don1357 View Post
    The oxidation may be tin but how significant can that be? I mean, on a 10 pound pot I could have 6 ounces of tin. What's the weight of that tin stain on the top of the molten alloy? A few grains?
    Good question and as stated above by kevin c , the amount lost is so small that for practical purposes, it is insignificant. If you were to run the pot very hot and continuously remove that oxidized layer, you might have a greater affect on the total alloy during the use of that pot, but even then I doubt it would be significant.

  9. #9
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Decatur county, TN
    Posts
    461
    I think it was BNE who tested this somewhat. Cooked some lead alloy for several hours and there was no change in the tin content. The tin oxidizes faster than the lead. So, if you keep skimming the surface, you'll probably see a change. But, once that skin is formed on the top, no further oxidization can take place and that skin isn't enough to make a difference.

    Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    England,Ar
    Posts
    7,693
    I have often wondered this myself. I seldom cast with anything other than straight wheel weights. But when I add in other things I stir it with a spoon before and during fluxing.

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master


    GregLaROCHE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Southern France by way of Interior Bush Alaska
    Posts
    5,293
    I stir during casting with some flux and bees wax just to be sure I get the best results possible.

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master
    bangerjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    out of here, wandering somewhere in the SW.
    Posts
    10,163
    Your melt will be darned near 100% homogeneous! Just stir occasionally and flux (as you are supposed to be doing anyway) to reduce the Sn back in and you will have the same alloy from top to bottom. The metals we mess with mix perfectly at the temps we use. I would not worry about any striation or layering at all.

    And has been proven many time over these past several years, hardness is not really as critical as once touted by the experts. I cast 90% of my boolits (223 thru 45cal) at 10-12 and then PC them for perfect clean barrel, no leading shooting.

    banger

  13. #13
    Banned



    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    7,068
    This is a very interesting thread. I guess I never thought about an alloy changing in the pot while casting.

    Seems like even if it did, the differences you'd probably get from individual pour to individual pour would make more difference than any alloy separation that would occur during the time it takes to empty a pot.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check