Ruger LC9S

[str8wal]

Just realized the the EC9 replaced the LC9. Are the sights and single mag the only differences?

My LC9s only had one mag. After handling both in the GS, the sights were worth the little bit extra money for the L

[Lefty Red]

FYI, just got my EC9S back from Ruger. That’s a 10 turn around.
Replaced the safety and mag disconnect safety, fired 21 rounds of WWB, and gave me a cleaning rag!

Safety feels way different than before, so I’m guessing just a lemon. Will put some rounds through it tonight and see it’s it’s good to go, which I believe it is.

Lefty

[saleen322]

We've had a LC9 for years. The trigger is heavy enough and with the safety, it is very safe to carry. The accuracy is very good for what it is and it was inexpensive to buy. Great piece for concealed carry.

[smkummer]

Yep, taught a female and she shot a perfect score on her KY cc qualification. She shot her LC9s as well as a 4” colt diamondback 38. That was the first time I have ever seen that happen. That says a lot about the trigger and the fit of the grip to control recoil on a light 9mm. We started with light reloads because I thought the recoil was going to be a turn off. In no time she was shooting win. white box with no complaints.

[jmort]

Just realized the the EC9 replaced the LC9. Are the sights and single mag the only differences?

No
LC9s Pro never replaced
https://www.ruger.com/products/lc9s/models.html

[35remington]

The original LC9 model has indeed been dropped by Ruger.

[RugerFan]

I got a LC9s for my daughter a few years ago. I load 95gn cast (PCed) fairly light so recoil is pretty negligible and she really loves it. I don't recall it jamming on anything either. Very reliable.

[marlin39a]

We have 2 of them concealed in the home. Great pistols.

[35remington]

I like ‘em concealed on my person.