A Canadian Classic!!!--just kidding

[BPJONES]

I recently picked this up because it was cheap and "just for the heck of it". It is a Cooey model 84 in 12 gauge. For those that don't know, Cooey was a Canadian firearms icon from 1919 to 1961 when they sold to Winchester. Pretty much every Canadian farm house back in the day had a Cooey or two by the door. Anyhow, this ole girl has been converted to shoot black powder. I don't know if the adapter is a factory made item or a "custom" made item. It doesn't look like the current ones for sale. I have not tried to remove it. It takes up pretty much all of the chamber. I see the adapters on the market now say for shot only. Well, it's obvious by the sights and the scope mounting rail that this ole girl has likely had its share of slugs or balls or whatever shot down the pipe with black powder. Who knows, maybe it was even shot with smokeless powder. I don't imagine it was any too accurate. The bore is nice and there are no bulges. The choke has been opened to pretty much cylinder. I have a fair collection of various Cooey guns so I thought it would be "cool" to add this "unique" gun to the fray. Since it is of low value, I've been thinking of doing some cosmetic enhancements, just to play around and to add "more character". Maybe a white buttplate spacer or recoil pad, make a horn pistol grip cap, swivels plus I have some varying thickness sheets of copper laying around so maybe I'll make up some designs and practice inletting them into the stock. Maybe some stippling on the forearm because I have no checkering tools. She'll be worthless to anyone else when finished but who cares!

[Der Gebirgsjager]

That's an interesting conversion. Appears both simple and effective. I guess it works with a shotgun primer? Is it easily removed, or more or less permanent?

[BPJONES]

It works with a 209 primer. I know the adapters you buy now can be pulled out or tapped out from the bore. I can't pull this one out but I have not tried tapping it out with a rod.

[Der Gebirgsjager]

Well, just curious. Probably best to leave it in place. If it works, you can't argue with success!

[wgr]

I have two that were converted just like that

[Peregrine]

I'm familiar with the 84's but I haven't seen a conversion like that before, very neat.

[RustyReel]

Very neat piece indeed. I'm guessing that after the Winchester purchase that model became the Winchester Model 37 as many of those are marked Made in Canada. Thanks for sharing!

[sharps4590]

Don't underestimate the accuracy of a "smooth rifle". I had my clocked cleaned often enough by guys shooting Trade Guns, without a rear sight, and I was shooting a rifle. I bet you'll be surprised at how good that ol' piece will shoot.

One thing I have always wondered about smooth bores and "shot versus bullet or round ball" is, say in a 16 bore, what the difference is between a 1 ounce load of shot or a 1 ounce round ball regarding pressures generated? Without checking I am going to assume a 12 bore round ball will weigh approximately 1 1/8 ounce, the standard load for a 12 bore. Is there a difference if shooting a round ball of that same weight?

[BPJONES]

Very neat piece indeed. I'm guessing that after the Winchester purchase that model became the Winchester Model 37 as many of those are marked Made in Canada. Thanks for sharing!

After the Winchester take over, the model 84 became the model 840. Some of the early Winchester 840's had walnut stocks and forged steel receivers, trigger guards and steel forearm spacers, likely because they were using up old stock from the Cooey purchase. But it didn't take Winchester long before the walnut became birch and castings took the place of steel and plastic trigger guards and forearm spacers became the norm. After the model 840, Winchester came out with the model 370 and then the 37A, not to be confused with the original Winchester model 37.

[BPJONES]

Don't underestimate the accuracy of a "smooth rifle". I had my clocked cleaned often enough by guys shooting Trade Guns, without a rear sight, and I was shooting a rifle. I bet you'll be surprised at how good that ol' piece will shoot.

One thing I have always wondered about smooth bores and "shot versus bullet or round ball" is, say in a 16 bore, what the difference is between a 1 ounce load of shot or a 1 ounce round ball regarding pressures generated? Without checking I am going to assume a 12 bore round ball will weigh approximately 1 1/8 ounce, the standard load for a 12 bore. Is there a difference if shooting a round ball of that same weight?

I would think there would be a difference in pressures although I have no idea of how much. I know with smokeless shotgun shells, pressures can be different depending on the type of powder used and/or the type of wad used and depending on how tight of a seal such wads provided. So I would think with the patching used with a round ball, compared to the wadding and over shot cards used when using shot, there would be a difference in pressures even with black powder. Of course I could be wrong.

[waksupi]

The sights are soldered on?

[BPJONES]

The sights are soldered on?

The scope rail and both sights are screwed on.

[sharps4590]

But if you change nothing but the type of projectile, shot to solid, would it be safe? I understand the Geman "Nicth fer Kugel" and the British "Not for Ball" but if the choke is more open or the gun not so marked seems to me a fella could do it. I haven't tried it but I'd like to....if I can satisfy myself it's going to be ok.

I get the BP thing, been playing with that stuff seriously for 40+ years in ML's and cartridge rifles and guns. Ran a bunch of 500 BPE rounds out the muzzles of my double on Saturday. After 20 years that thing is still a hoot!

[BPJONES]

The gun should be safe if switching to a solid projectile. (I'm talking this particular gun). The choke has been opened up. I know back in the day, there were countless slugs fired through these old Cooeys by hunters and farmers and that was with full choke. So I know the gun can handle a solid projectile. And I'm guessing this ole girl had a number of solid projectiles shot down her bore since being converted. So far I can see it is no worse for wear.

[725]

It might not be collector gun, but it looks to be in good shape. Lots of folks would be happy to have such a gun. It yours so, of course, adorn it as you see fit. Bella Twin used her .22 Cooey to good effect, setting a world record with only .22 long ammo.

[OverMax]

That's a bit different. A 100 yr old smooth bore inline. "I like it"
Curious? Is the breech plate base threaded or a cold to hot force fit?

[BPJONES]

That's a bit different. A 100 yr old smooth bore inline. "I like it"
Curious? Is the breech plate base threaded or a cold to hot force fit?

Actually this gun is no older than 1948 as that is when Cooey started producing shotguns. It looks to be force fit.

[Hawks Feather]

I had a 410 Cooey when I was a kid. I got it when it came in on a trade at the hardware store where I worked. Nice little gun, but I sold it when I started college.

[BPJONES]

The Cooey .410's don't last long when they come up for sale, especially the original model 84. 28 gauge model 84 Cooeys are gone in the blink of an eye if one comes up for sale.

[arcticap]

I decide to look up info. about Cooey and found this article titled: COOEY: THE HISTORY OF CANADA’S GUNMAKER --->>> https://calibremag.ca/cooey-canadas-gunmaker/

I never realized the connections between Cooey and Lakefield .22's which are sold by Savage.

I have a Savage .22 bolt action rifle that was made by Lakefield and now I have a sense of its history.
And it has a receiver that's built like a tank.

The last Cooey designed model was a .22 semi-auto rifle that still lives on as the Savage model 64B which is still being produced by Lakefield.
So the Cooey legend continues.....
The article is a good read.