Load DataInline FabricationMidSouth Shooters SupplyLee Precision
RepackboxRotoMetals2Titan ReloadingReloading Everything
Wideners Snyders Jerky
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 60

Thread: Ladle vs Bottom Pour

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master


    GregLaROCHE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Southern France by way of Interior Bush Alaska
    Posts
    5,293

    Ladle vs Bottom Pour

    It seems a lot of people believe using a ladle to pour gives better results. How many people agree with this and if so, better in what way(s).
    Thanks

  2. #2
    Boolit Master
    barrabruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Far Nth Qld Australia
    Posts
    1,989
    I ladle pour cos I’m to stingy to by a letric one and have to run leads here or there.
    I mostly positive pour as in put the spout into the mould ala Lyman style.
    I get a nice flat full base.

    If I pour from a ways above the mold I don’t seem to get as good fill out unless I overflow the mold for a bit.

    Some of my moulds like a different pour and cadence as I get feathering.

    I mostly use a kero burner outside and a fan blowing.
    I find it better than being locked into a hot garage to cast.
    I suppose I could be missing out of the fumes chasing or killing the creepy crawlers in there thou.

    Ladle pouring gives me options I suppose and I don’t have to stoop to see where the leads going.

  3. #3
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Central CA for the time being!
    Posts
    207
    Started w lee drip o magic bottom pour. Couldn't get it to stop dripping and replaced the pot liner with a solid one with No hole for spout for spout.

    When the new RCBS came out I got the easy melt that is ladle pour only. Had rebates and it was only 75 bucks I believe. Works great w built in pic. Only problem is it takes about 2 hrs to cool off enough to unplug it as the pid electronics need the fan to keep them cool until pot gets to 160, at least thats what the manuals shows.
    Much better bullets w pressure pour if needed or w a 1 lb bottom pour ladle.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    winelover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    North Central Arkansas
    Posts
    2,403
    Ladle pouring gives me more uniform bullets, in terms of weight, thus a higher percentage of keepers.

    Winelover

  5. #5
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ball Ground, GA
    Posts
    416
    The only way I get great boolits with a ladle is pressure casting(ladle spout in the sprue plate.) Bottom pour with the sprue plate very close to the pot spout and a puddle of lead on top yields my best bullets. The farther away from the spout on bottom pour starts to affect the base fill out on flat base or gas check shanks. I will admit that on big long boolits, pressure casting works best for me, other than that, bottom pour is my preferred method.
    Tony

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,703
    I don't know any way a person could get better results than I do with my Lee 20lb bottom pour pot.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by tazman View Post
    I don't know any way a person could get better results than I do with my Lee 20lb bottom pour pot.
    That's my sentiment also. And at rate that's much quicker.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spokane, Wa.
    Posts
    2,636
    Bottom pour insures that you don't get impurities in your boolits because they float to the top. Also, the pot is easier to maintain the same temp if you apply a layer of new kitty litter on top. This keeps the heat in, as well as preventing oxidation of your melt. You can also tandem cast with two moulds much faster with the bottom pour method. I can maintain the same relative flow into the mould as the melt level drops by adjusting the pot handle lever screw.
    I discarded my ladle over 50 years ago when I bought my first Lyman 20 pound furnace. I now use an RCBS Pro-melt and I love it.
    It's all chicken, even the beak!

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    St.Germain, WI
    Posts
    723
    I started out with a ladle but once a neighbor gave me a bottom pour, I never went back. Have had a Lee 10 lb. for 20 years now and yes it was a drip-o-matic. So I tapped a hole in the plunger and put a handle on it. Just give it a flick now and then.
    The only amendment the Democrats support is the 5th.

  10. #10
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    39
    I use the Lyman pro furnace and don’t think I’d have the patience to go to using a ladle.

  11. #11
    Moderator Emeritus


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SW Montana
    Posts
    12,481
    I started with bottom pours and found that fill out problems were eliminated with ladle filling. I had some recalcitrant molds that resisted with a cavity or more and went to a ladle for almost all of my pours.
    [The Montana Gianni] Front sight and squeeze

  12. #12
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    Do you put the ladle spout on the mold cavity hole in the sprue plate or just get it close enough to get a good pour???

  13. #13
    Boolit Master
    oldblinddog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by jmort View Post
    Do you put the ladle spout on the mold cavity hole in the sprue plate or just get it close enough to get a good pour???
    Put the ladle in contact with the sprue plate. I have only cast with a ladle, never a bottom pour. However, my ladle is a bottom pour like this one https://www.rotometals.com/casting-l...handle-length/
    USMC 6638

  14. #14
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    I have a #1 (and a #7 for ingots), and a Lyman and a soup ladle with a 3/32" hole as devised by one of our members, aka Grumpy Old Man. I never pressure pour, i.e. zero contact with ladle and sprue plate. This video shows a #1 and the soup ladle with 3/32" hole which works really well (at 6:45 mark) of this most interesting video.

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    oldblinddog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    964
    That is slick!
    USMC 6638

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master

    mdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    So. Orygun
    Posts
    7,240
    All the opinions above are personal preferences. For each individual that posted, the choice is what works best for them and all the reasons can be debated. I have done both, but I prefer an electric bottom pour pot. Fill out, speed, temp control are all done by the user for a particular style of casting that works for them. Most casters can extol the benefits of their choice and condemn the other. I used a Lyman style ladle for a couple years and got good, clean bullets, and I now use a bottom pour and get good clean bullets...
    My Anchor is holding fast!

  17. #17
    Moderator Emeritus / Trusted loob groove dealer

    waksupi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Somers, Montana, a quaint little drinking village,with a severe hunting and fishing problem.
    Posts
    19,379
    I never could keep a six cavity mold at heat with a dip pot.
    The solid soft lead bullet is undoubtably the best and most satisfactory expanding bullet that has ever been designed. It invariably mushrooms perfectly, and never breaks up. With the metal base that is essential for velocities of 2000 f.s. and upwards to protect the naked base, these metal-based soft lead bullets are splendid.
    John Taylor - "African Rifles and Cartridges"

    Forget everything you know about loading jacketed bullets. This is a whole new ball game!


  18. #18
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    861
    Tried both but with bottom pour i make more boolits faster.

    That molds are their own problem and you have to figure out what they like.

  19. #19
    Boolit Bub Bait O' Eggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    38
    I have been pouring lead for decades, mostly fishing stuff, used a soup can bent up with a pour spout and a vice grip holding it for about 40 years. I bought a 20lb lee drip o'matic a year ago and cant believe I didnt do that a long time ago. So much faster and easier.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,330
    I use both methods. Which simply depends on the size (weight) of the bullet I casting. Generally for 300 gr or less I use the bottom pour (Lyman Mag20) although I have one 350 gr mould that casts excellently using the bottom pour. For most others 375+ gr I use a ladle.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check