Reloading EverythingLee PrecisionTitan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters Supply
Load DataSnyders JerkyInline FabricationRotoMetals2
Repackbox Wideners
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: .223 vs .243 vs .270

  1. #21
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    4,549
    I would not take anyone's word with cast in .223 unless they have a proven record with those small bullets. Same for 6mm. Larger dia is easier. Many will just blame the rifle when it is their casting/processing techniques that are at fault.

    I tried cast .22 a long time ago. Never had luck with them. 30cal was where I found a sweet spot for cast rifle bullets.

  2. #22
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Center Point, Texas
    Posts
    605
    Last time I cast for .22 I cast about 200 bullets and threw away about 190 of them.. They can be a real pain. Same session I cast a bunch of 30 cal. LEE "soup cans" and didn't have to throw any of them away. My favorite cast bullet gun right now is an old sporterized 30-06 I got for $150.. I have a lot of rifles, some real expensive ones but the one I always seem to go to the range with is the old Model 1917.

  3. #23
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    177
    I’ll bite. It’s a little more expensive but not insanely so. What does the 1500 get me that the others don’t?
    Currently in the process of developing the "perfect" cast .223 load for my AR-15. Click here to follow my progress

  4. #24
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Gwinnett Georgia
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by BHuij View Post
    I’ll bite. It’s a little more expensive but not insanely so. What does the 1500 get me that the others don’t?
    Quality.

    They are nice rifles with very well made hammer forged barrels. A good flat bottom receiver with integral recoil lug like a win 70. The bolt has an m16 style extractor and is very easy to break down with 0 tools for cleaning. Stock trigger is very good. I’m a fan of 2 stage triggers so even better for me in that sense. It’s also adjustable. They are available in featherweight models to heavy barrel. All kinds of stock choices although they get much more expensive. Recently I saw a heavy barrel scopes package for $369 I think it was. Also saw a standard no scope for $289 but that was in 22-250. I bought all 3 of mine as barreled receivers for $250 for two of them and $380 for the heavy barrel cerakote then I added my own stock but it is much cheaper to buy as a full rifle.
    They use the same 2 piece scope mounts as rem 700 single piece mounts won’t fit.
    The blueing on the two blued ones I own was very nice and smooth bolts right out of the box

    I was into the long range shooting so I have a .308 and a .243 along with another one waiting to go into a manners and a pacnor 6.5 creed barrel.
    I have no experience shooting cast in any of them. But I will say of all my stock barrels they are by far the smoothest looking and best made. The Savage axis in .223 that my stepbrother has is like a toy in comparison (but boy does that thing shoot. Sub 1moa all day). The .243 howa will hold .75 moa and I’ve gotten much smaller. The .308 does similar.

  5. #25
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    8,990
    I bought a Howa in .223. It will be my fiancé’s rifle and will keep it ready to go in the family room if a coyote wanders into the area.

    Once you handle it, you will see the difference between it and the econo models.

    I have no need to turn it into a .22 Mag by trying to shoot cast out if it so it will only see jacketed bullets.

    Like the previous poster said, it may not shoot any better but it feels better.
    Don Verna


  6. #26
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    4,241
    Gotta second Popper in post #7. You can manage distance with velocity or with momentum, and the .223, .243, and .270 were all engineered to do it with velocity you don't get with cast.

    I'd suggest a .30-06 in the best rifle you can afford - the round has a relatively longer neck to contain multile grease grooves. NOE's copy of the (200 grain) 311299 gas checked mold at a launch speed somewhere in the ballpark of 2000-2100 fps will serve you well. That will put you in the ballistic neighborhood of the pre-1910 .303 British loadings.
    WWJMBD?

    In the Land of Oz, we cast with wheel weight and 2% Tin, Man.

  7. #27
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,408
    On the Howa/Weatherby Vanguard- add a wood Boyd's stock and you have a beautiful rifle. Still can't quite say that with a Compass, Axis, or 783 IMO.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

  8. #28
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Gwinnett Georgia
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by Texas by God View Post
    On the Howa/Weatherby Vanguard- add a wood Boyd's stock and you have a beautiful rifle. Still can't quite say that with a Compass, Axis, or 783 IMO.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
    That is true got two laminate stocks on mine and they look great



  9. #29
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Quilcene, Washington
    Posts
    3,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Tatume View Post
    You should get what you want. If you are getting good results with 223 cast, that is an accomplishment in itself.
    Definitely!

  10. #30
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,581
    Howa/Weatherby Vanguard GKs both have them in 243 - I zero'd the scopes on them. Dang they are accurate shooters, even with factory stuff. They do have different chambers - HS. Had to reload for the shorter so the longer wouldn't jam. The safety is different on them. Saw a guy at the range take his brand new 308W out of the box and cloverleaf at 100 without zeroing the scope.
    Whatever!

  11. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    337
    770 is a great rifle. The only actual problem ive ever had is that NEW magazines can take a lot of round cycleing before feed issues stop.

    What comes with REAL iron sights circa military around 1930?

  12. #32
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    402
    The SAECO 243 GC mold (drops at 80 grains with linotype) averages 1.5" five shot groups at 100 yards, loaded over 12.3 grains of #2400 (what my Little Dandy rotor #15 throws) in my little .243 carbine. This is the best accuracy that I have found with cast, clocked at 1650 fps. Ballistics of a .25-20, so for hunting it is small game only, but nice for targets as you can bang away 10 shots before the barrel even gets warm. Frankly I was not expecting this level of accuracy, it is likely rifle dependent, and your results may differ.

    My .223 will lay them in there with jackets, but opens up to 3 or 4 MOA + with cast. I could never get a Hornet to shoot any better than that, either.
    Last edited by Bill*B; 12-26-2018 at 10:18 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check