I had some pewter that was contaminated by zinc handle on an item. I was chopping the stuff up with a torch and by the time I realized that one item was melting "weird" it was already in the melt.
So I had them tested to get the percentage of tin and zinc. And it was 9% on the zinc end. Well I got to thinking and decided I would see what percentage of zinc I would end up with if I made a normal pot of WW's with 3% Sn with 3% Sb.
To get that 94/3/3 was going to take:
1# mono/foundry type
1# contaminated pewter 89/7/4 misc. Sb & Cu
30# COWW lead
Zinc percentage was 0.29 and yes even that small amount made a difference.
What I got was a constant sludge on top, no point in scrapping it off as more would form so I just pushed aside and ladled from the cleared spot.
The ingots from this seemed to pour ok if a little bit odd flowing. The pot was constantly covered with a frothy sludge. Heat source was a propane turkey fryer and cast iron dutch oven. I was running pretty hot but did notice hotter seemed better. Neglected to measure temperature.
I ended up leaving a few pounds of slush and such in the pot to cool. So even if I gain something from the use of the contaminated alloy I will probably lose some weight in the process. Unless I find a temperature that reduces the froth back into the melt.
I have heard of people working with lead having up to almost 4% zinc contamination, would love to hear what they use for temperatures if known. I'm thinking even my 0.29% might yield a harder alloy which could prove interesting. If I can make it work. Right now I'm not sure but it seems like the loses outweigh the gains but we shall see.
I'm going to try the resulting alloy in a .310 RB mold and see what it looks like. Heat will be hot plate for the mold and Lee 20# melter and ladle casting. Will have a thermometer to record the melt temp. Will report back here with further results.