I wonder if this might be it. I checked my gun's (it's a Kimber Micro 9 btw) firing pin channel last night and I don't see any gap around the firing pin. So that halo might not be cratering in the classic sense, as in the primer flowing into the firing pin hole.
If you look closely:
*you'll notice that there is no difference in the diameter of the dimples. So it doesn't appear that the dimples are being pushed back.
*the halos are raised ever so slightly above the plain of the primer, but the main surface of the halo is flattened. It appears as though the halo was pushed back into the breech face, not into the firing pin channel.
*all the primers have well-rounded shoulders and none of them exhibit imprinting of the breech face, except for that part of the halo.
I am convinced that 35Remington is correct. The 1 1/2 primers are made of a softer/thinner cup. I am guessing that when the pin strikes the cup and makes the dimple, the metal surrounding the dimple stretches even thinner. That thinned halo then gets pushed back against the breech face, not into the firing pin channel. The rest of the primer surrounding the halo does not exhibit any breech face imprinting.
I am using the wrong primers, for this application and I probably have room to increase some. However, my goal was to match the velocity of the factory Fiocchi 125 grain XTP ammo, and at 996 fps I have succeeded.