Inline FabricationLee PrecisionTitan ReloadingRotoMetals2
WidenersRepackboxLoad DataReloading Everything
MidSouth Shooters Supply
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: New Vaquero slugged too tight?

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    185

    New Vaquero slugged too tight?

    I bought a Ruger New Vaquero off gunbroker not long ago. Havent shot it yet but I figured the down time would be a great time to load up some ammo. I've never slugged a barrel before but after reading a bunch of opinions (here and other places) I tried today. I had some new fishing weights (very soft so I assume pure lead). The tightest point in my NV barrel is .444 this seems pretty tight for a .45 to me. Cylinder throats are pretty uniform at .451 (my apologies I wrote .458 and didnt catch my typo) with the forcing cone a bit tighter than that. Should I be worried about the barrel measuring .444 or did I pull a bone head new guy screw up?
    No burrs or anything obviously visually wrong that I can see. Gun appeared new with little or no use when I got it. I didnt drop the lead after I slugged the barrel or otherwise deform it. I'm using Hornady digital calipers, my Starretts are in storage or I'd compare with those in case my calipers are simply off.

    Help!
    Last edited by HawkCreek; 04-13-2020 at 07:46 PM.

  2. #2
    Vendor Sponsor

    DougGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    just above Raleigh North Carolina
    Posts
    7,395
    I think the calipers are throwing off your measurements. Sounds like you are measuring bore diameter, which is the land-to-land distance, you would be measuring the grooves in the slug after it dropped out. Measuring the fat part of the slug would be measuring the groove diameter in the barrel which Ruger has held right at .451" now for decades. Your bore measurement should be closer to .4425"

    Cylinder throats in these new medium framed models are right at .451" - .4515" not anywhere near .458"
    Got a .22 .30 .32 .357 .38 .40 .41 .44 .45 .480 or .500 S&W cylinder that needs throats honed? 9mm, 10mm/40S&W, 45 ACP pistol barrel that won't "plunk" your handloads? 480 Ruger or 475 Linebaugh cylinder that needs the "step" reamed to 6° 30min chamfer? Click here to send me a PM You can also find me on Facebook Click Here.

  3. #3
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by DougGuy View Post
    I think the calipers are throwing off your measurements. Sounds like you are measuring bore diameter, which is the land-to-land distance, you would be measuring the grooves in the slug after it dropped out. Measuring the fat part of the slug would be measuring the groove diameter in the barrel which Ruger has held right at .451" now for decades. Your bore measurement should be closer to .4425"

    Cylinder throats in these new medium framed models are right at .451" - .4515" not anywhere near .458"
    Sorry, I meant to type .451 for the cylinder throats. Not sure how I missed that.
    I'm measuring the widest point of the slug not the narrowest. Is that not correct?

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master


    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Aberdeen, South Dakota
    Posts
    7,136
    Try this. Only start a weight into the muzzle. Some use short sections of dowel through the frame end to push the slug back out the muzzle. I've had luck using a short section of brass rod, say 3/8", and rocking the revolver to slide hammer the slug back out. If the muzzle end measures say .451", and the slug you pushed all the way through is truly .444", you have a serious bore constriction that needs fixing. That would be about the worst I have heard of. Usually .002" is plenty bad.

  5. #5
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by megasupermagnum View Post
    Try this. Only start a weight into the muzzle. Some use short sections of dowel through the frame end to push the slug back out the muzzle. I've had luck using a short section of brass rod, say 3/8", and rocking the revolver to slide hammer the slug back out. If the muzzle end measures say .451", and the slug you pushed all the way through is truly .444", you have a serious bore constriction that needs fixing. That would be about the worst I have heard of. Usually .002" is plenty bad.
    Muzzle is the tightest point. It took a bit to get the lead started, once the ring of excess was removed it fairly sailed down the barrel and only needed a light coaxing to get past the forcing cone.

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master


    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Aberdeen, South Dakota
    Posts
    7,136
    Something is amiss. If your muzzle groove diameter was .444", then your rifling would be nearly missing. I have to wonder if you didn't get the slug cocked in the bore, causing a misreading.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master Skipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Behind the lines in Commiefornia
    Posts
    764
    Are you trying to measure an odd number of lands and grooves?
    The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government.
    -- Thomas Jefferson

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Just for grins, try pushing the slug from the barrel through the cylinder throats. If your measurements are accurate, it should just drop through easily. If it is a snug fit, the measurement is off.

  9. #9
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by tazman View Post
    Just for grins, try pushing the slug from the barrel through the cylinder throats. If your measurements are accurate, it should just drop through easily. If it is a snug fit, the measurement is off.
    I did that before I even measured it. Drops right through the throats of each chamber.

    6 lands and 6 grooves by my count.

    It's possible I somehow got the slug started and then canted it I suppose. But I was surprised at how faint the rifling marks seem to be. They are there and identifiable but not deep at all.

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Well, you shouldn't have issues with leading as the groove diameter is less than the cylinder throats and presumably smaller than whatever you will size your boolits.
    With very thin rifling, you may have an issue with the boolits shearing and not getting a good grip on the rifling.
    No way to know without trying it and see.

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master


    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Aberdeen, South Dakota
    Posts
    7,136
    Quote Originally Posted by HawkCreek View Post
    I did that before I even measured it. Drops right through the throats of each chamber.

    6 lands and 6 grooves by my count.

    It's possible I somehow got the slug started and then canted it I suppose. But I was surprised at how faint the rifling marks seem to be. They are there and identifiable but not deep at all.
    One other thing you can try is with your calipers in the muzzle, see approximately how deep the rifling is. If the rifling is only .001" deep, well there it is. It wouldn't be unsafe, and you could shoot. Just as easily you could send it to Ruger, and they would fix it for free.

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Some of the early 1911 45ACP barrels had thin, shallow rifling and required really hard alloy for boolits to be accurate in them.
    I had a similar issue with a couple of 9mm barrels. They worked fine with jacketed but not with cast. The barrels got replaced and they work fine now.
    If the rifling is too shallow to properly grip the boolits, I would do as MSM suggested and sent it back to Ruger with a description of the issue.

  13. #13
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    185
    I'm having trouble measuring the muzzle (not enough hands) but the grooves in the slug are .437 to .440
    I'm going to try again before I send it off. I was going to order some bullets to try, sheesh all I wanted was to know what size to order. I've got an old model Vaquero and a Winchester 92 that I was going to check.
    Any tips before I try again? I'm wondering more and more if I didnt somehow get the slug canted at the muzzle which threw everything off.
    Last edited by HawkCreek; 04-13-2020 at 10:55 PM.

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,514
    I’d have to go back into my load books but if I remember all my throats were .451 as well and my barrel Slugged about .0005 smaller(.4505). I ran my .451 slug through my barrel after I sized it through my throats. I found at .451 a sized boolit could easily be pushed through all my throats with very little pressure with the use of my finger or a pencil. When I slugged my .451 sized boolit through my barrel I had plenty of deep grooves in my boolit (slug) from the barrel lands/grooves. I was paranoid that my boolits would not be oversized enough vs my bore diameter to shoot accurately and I would have leading. All I can tell you is my vaquero shoots in the same hole at 15 yards and I can hit shotgun shells consistently at 25 yards freehand with it and absolutely no leading issues. I loaded my boolits long to the point they are almost touching the forcing cone. I’m using 5.2 grains of trail boss, the lee 255 grain mold, 50/50 alloy with 2%pewter, and PC. Fun times! Dougguy walked me through the process. My new vaquero is one accurate pistol! It shot to the left till I adjusted my finger placement on the trigger. Now I’m dead center. I have to lower my front blade about half way down into the rear sight to be right on the money.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 04-13-2020 at 10:49 PM.

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master


    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Aberdeen, South Dakota
    Posts
    7,136
    Quote Originally Posted by HawkCreek View Post
    I'm having trouble measuring the muzzle (honor enough hands) but the grooves in the slug are .437 to .440
    I'm going to try again before I send it off. I was going to order some bullets to try, sheesh all I wanted was to know what size to order. I've got an old model Vaquero and a Winchester 92 that I was going to check.
    Any tips before I try again? I'm wondering more and more if I didnt somehow get the slug canted at the muzzle which threw everything off.
    You can certainly try it as is. It may even shoot well. If you have any jacketed bullets at .451", try those in the throats. If those are a slip fit, buy .451" cast bullets. Being as .450" bullets may be tough to find, .451" may be your only option anyway.

  16. #16
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    185
    All I've got around is a partial box of American Eagle 225 grain. No bullet pullers handy. Most of my recording stuff is in storage.
    I'll try to measure it again but if I get similar results I'll probably see if Ruger will replace my barrel. I bought this gun to shoot cast, specifically the 270 RCBS design. Looks like .451 is the smallest I can get from Montna Bullet Works. Part of me wants to try it out but it also seems like I would be toeing the unsafe side of the line.

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    578
    Something is amiss. My New Vaquero 45 Colt I bought about three years ago slugged .4515 cyl throats, .450 groove and .442 bore diameter. .452 casts shoot just fine for me. You said the slug sailed down the barrel after the excess ring was removed. You sure the fishing weight lead was really as soft as you thought?

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,514
    I would take it to a smith to slug it again for a second opinion. I don’t think your barrel measurement is correct. I normally run a few slugs through my barrels and take the average measurement between them. I use a cheap harbor freight micrometer so it’s not the most accurate measurement devise but gets the job done.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master


    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Aberdeen, South Dakota
    Posts
    7,136
    Quote Originally Posted by HawkCreek View Post
    All I've got around is a partial box of American Eagle 225 grain. No bullet pullers handy. Most of my recording stuff is in storage.
    I'll try to measure it again but if I get similar results I'll probably see if Ruger will replace my barrel. I bought this gun to shoot cast, specifically the 270 RCBS design. Looks like .451 is the smallest I can get from Montna Bullet Works. Part of me wants to try it out but it also seems like I would be toeing the unsafe side of the line.
    Personally I question the measurement, but even if it is correct, and Ruger messed up on the rifling, it should be safe to shoot.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by HawkCreek View Post
    All I've got around is a partial box of American Eagle 225 grain. No bullet pullers handy. Most of my recording stuff is in storage.
    I'll try to measure it again but if I get similar results I'll probably see if Ruger will replace my barrel. I bought this gun to shoot cast, specifically the 270 RCBS design. Looks like .451 is the smallest I can get from Montna Bullet Works. Part of me wants to try it out but it also seems like I would be toeing the unsafe side of the line.
    You will not blow up the gun using standard loads and .451 bullets or boolits. Remember, the factory did proof test the gun with loads that should be beyond anything you will ever run through it. Shoot it and find out what it does.
    If it won't work right, then send it back for correction. .451 down to .444 is only 7 thousandths after all. I don't consider that enough to be a dangerous situation.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check