WidenersRepackboxRotoMetals2Lee Precision
MidSouth Shooters SupplyInline FabricationReloading EverythingLoad Data
Titan Reloading
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: Part 2 ~ I finally made it to the Range!

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933

    Part 2 ~ I finally made it to the Range!

    So, I made it to the range again! That's two weekends in a row.

    This trip was more informative and I got some decent results... and learned (relearned in some cases) some lessons.

    I took 13 different slug types to the range which was probably too many but some were out for a second spin (elimination testing) and some were modifications of slugs that had worked reasonably well before.

    Overall results were mixed but I got three not bad targets out of it all and some confirmations of slugs not to try again or things to watch for.

    All shooting was at 50 yards and all from a smoothbore single shot with rifle sights.

    I also had a good rest this time. I made myself a cross stick rest with base that worked very well. While it is made from scrap lumber and my carpentry skills are far from good it turned out pretty well and works perfectly (in my opinion anyway). Pic sitting on the snow in my backyard:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	copyCross Sticks.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	46.2 KB 
ID:	216463

    I like it anyway! It is easily adjustable and allows me to sit high so better to absorb recoil and I shot 70 rounds last Sunday so lots of recoil!

    Base is 18" long with 18" feet on it and cross sticks are 22" or so long with lots of height adjustment.

    First the successes!

    1) Lee 1 oz. slug sized to remove taper then paper patched to snug fit. Same as I had done with the 7/8 oz. slugs last outing and in fact these were loaded at the same time but not shot. Pic:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC1_Lee 1 oz.jpg 
Views:	47 
Size:	67.1 KB 
ID:	216464

    Not too bad.

    - largest spread = 6”
    - 4 in about 4”


    2) Home made TC 490 gr. HB glue filled in shotcups:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC2_490 gr. HB.jpg 
Views:	44 
Size:	65.6 KB 
ID:	216465

    - largest spread = 7” (could be the shooter)
    - 4 in 4”

    3) Full bore knurled 565 gr. slug (glue filled) from home made mould:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC3_565 gr. full bore.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	64.4 KB 
ID:	216466

    - largest spread = 6 1/4” (could be the shooter)
    - 4 in 5 1/4”
    - the nice clean holes (5) are from the 565 gr. slugs. I ran out of targets so re-used one here with some tape on the back.

    This time this slug was loaded over a hard card wad column and worked not badly. Last time I had loaded these over a cushion leg after cutting petals off the wad. I won't be doing that again as they shot very poorly!

    So those were the successes and not too bad overall.

    Lots of failures too:

    - Nessler Ball clones were tested again both as cast so slightly under bore diameter and knurled up then sized to bore diameter. Neither shot well.

    These are from a mould I made based on an old drawing. Nessler Balls were used widely during the Crimean war and in the American Civil War. There were a kind of Minie designed for smoothbore muskets and supposedly improved both accuracy and range over the typical loose round ball. Couldn't prove it from my testing!

    They weighed 585 grs. and packed quite a punch out to 125 yards smashing a fairly large rock... but accuracy was poor.

    - Lee 7/8 oz. slugs. Well, another failure here but that is my fault in loading. This time out I felt and heard significant differences in recoil and BANG! and I actually had 3 bloopers out of 10 shots. I used Unique which is likely a little slow for such a light payload but certainly there was very inconsistent ignition/powder burn. That would explain very poor accuracy. Some were shots as cast and some with added glue skirt but all gave poor accuracy. These will be retested with faster powder and maybe to a recommended recipe as well!

    - 0.678" RB's. Another anomaly! I have had very good results in the past but these last two trips not so good. However, to qualify things. The payload is slightly long and the fold crimps started to open slightly. Again, there was inconsistent recoil and BANG! so I am guessing that ignition/powder burn was not consistent. Poor loading technique on my part.

    Several other slugs were shot as well with some of the same observations made re inconsistent ignition. I did have trouble with roll crimping the Federal hulls last time so used mostly fold crimps this time. The fold crimps seemed to work better with these hulls. Some slugs had roll crimps and some fold crimps.

    I need to buy a bunch of new hulls that are suitable for roll crimping. My Fiocchi hulls roll crimped very nicely but the plastic is a little more flexible than the Federal hulls.

    I also learned (relearned a few lessons):

    - make sure the payload fits properly!

    - make sure the crimp is good and solid

    - I noticed that I had mistakenly used Claybuster wads for several wad slugs and every one I recovered had burned/blown/damaged gas seal... EVERY ONE! I had grabbed a handful of wads thinking they were Winchester wads (not Winchester AA Red wads though). Now the Winchester wads I recovered were all good. DON'T USE CLAYBUSTER WADS FOR SLUGS! I knew that.

    - I had also used some left over Winchester AA Red wads for some 0.678" RB loads. Recovered Winchester AA Red wads were all damaged... I knew that so why did I used them? Who knows!?

    - Take a hat! Actually while it makes a good excuse... the sun actually was in my eyes for part of the shooting making it difficult to see the sights... really!

    Overall it was a much better day and as always, good to be at the range. Having gotten better results and learning (relearning) a few lessons was good too. And... I like my new rest! It helped eliminate some (but not all) shooter error.

    There's more but you guys are probably bored by now. I'll post more when I have things all tuned up and have some impressive targets to post (hopefully).

    Next trip will likely include some Russian Paradox slug testing thanks to Kraken Fan #69 who sent me a large box of slugs to play with. Interestingly the tail wads fit into my full bore 565 gr. slugs like they were made for them so... I may just try that out too.

    Longbow

  2. #2
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    39.7594° N, 84.1917° W
    Posts
    850
    Nice work !!
    I always find your testing interesting.

    You have a lot more patience with various combinations than I do, I have read thru a lot of posts and tried all sorts of combination with the LEE slugs and I can't get any consistency.
    I guess for the time being I'm going to stick with my .678 RB with it's 5" groups.

    I'm still pursuing the elusive Lyman rifled slug kit. I really want to see for myself what that kit actually produced (SLUG SIZE) before I give up on that idea.

    Scott
    Scott

    You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master Cap'n Morgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,458
    Seventy rounds! Aimed shooting!! You're made of stronger stuff than me. You really should consider some sort of scope for your gun. It doesn't have to be anything fancy, but it will take some of the strain of the shooting - especially during the last few seconds before the hammer drops

    Good to see things are looking much brighter this time around. Looking at your results, I can't help wondering if the Lee slug(s) could be improved on by a drastic sizing to bring them down in size, and at the same time perhaps elongate them a tad. Then "patching" them with an extra layer of cut off petals, upside down to compensate for any taper in the petals. The thicker the layer, the better the protection against deforming in the forcing cone, and the slugs should stabilize better in the bore. Don't worry if you end up with a combined diameter much larger than the bore; it will squeeze down just fine, and a tight fit is what we're looking for (nudge nudge, wink wink)
    Cap'n Morgan

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    Yeah... 70 rounds! That was last Sunday and my shoulder is still a bit "tender". Accumulated recoil wasn't as bad as I'd expected since most loads weren't maxed out. Some were pretty skookum but most were on the moderate side. That and my new cross stick rest allowing me to sit high helped a lot with absorbing recoil.

    I really shouldn't have bothered with that many combinations but I had loaded many several months ago so figured it was time I shot them.

    The copper tube skirted slugs were a bit of a disappointment. I have shot varying versions using 0.662" RB's, 0.678" RB's and my new TC spigot fit slugs. They have done fairly well in the past but did not work well this time. Partly due to the fact that the ones I had completed and loaded had a slightly undersize nose driving band. I have modified the mould and the 490 gr. HB slugs have the same nose design but larger nose driving band, so... that's one I'll try next time. Benefits of the copper tube skirt are that it is easy to get and easy to work and makes a nice consistent lightweight skirt when filled with glue (not all of us have access to injection moulding equipment!).

    I'll limit myself to just a few designs next time and vary loads a bit to try to tighten groups up. Crimps are, I suspect, a major contributor to the inconsistencies. I'll have to play with those Federal hulls to try get better crimps until i can get new hulls.

    I've found the Lee slugs okay as is but really don't like the taper on them which is why I decided to size then PP them. Seems to work with the 1 oz. but I need to get a good load going with the 7/8 oz. I have some Green Dot but that is as fast as I have. I may have to pick up a pound of 700X or Red Dot if I can find it. A better deep roll crimp may also allow Unique to work but 7/8 oz. is a pretty light payload.

    As for the Lyman Foster, I wouldn't waste my time. Even if the slug can be made to shoot reasonably accurately it is a thin fragile slug. I really don't much like them. The old Rapine full bore 530 gr. was a nice slug but no-one makes a mould anymore.

    Not sure where you will find a slug rifling kit these days. A guy sold one on this site a few years ago. I thought about it but really don;t like the slug or the mould so didn't bother.

    SluggerDoug make a "knurler" using helical gears to "knurl" helical grooves into Lyman slugs displacing lead and bringing the slugs up to bore diameter. He reported good accuracy from them.

    Paper patching the Lyman Fosters helped for me but I think the paper patches tended to get torn opening crimps or patches didn't come off cleanly or something as there were still fliers. Could even have been wads pushing into the HB cavity as I wasn't smart enough to fill in those days. But again, I have not been interested in the Lyman Foster so no more testing. My full bore slug is much more substantial and shoots better even if groups are still a bit large. I'll work on it!

    Anyway, things are looking up and if I take more care in loading I am sure groups will shrink some more.

    Longbow

  5. #5
    Boolit Master

    Hogtamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    East central GA, Appling near Augusta
    Posts
    3,307
    I still chuckle at "skookum" LB! Yes, good crimps are mandatory. BTW, for the "poochy" loads the best wad I found has been the HCD 18 from BPI. If you need more height you can add a hard card under the wad base and the shot cups are a perfect fit for the 7/8 slugs. https://www.ballisticproducts.com/HC.../products/659/ And the frangible plastic 12 ga OS cards make a great crimp. https://www.ballisticproducts.com/Cl.../products/112/
    "My main ambition in life is to be on the devil's most wanted list."
    Leonard Ravenhill

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    Hal:

    Yeah, I really messed up on the crimps ands that is undoubtedly part of the issue with the 0.678" RB's. I had three in 2 3/4" right smack in the bullseye but two more dropped about 6" low. I could feel the difference in recoil and hear the BOOM! vs. bang. I'm thinking those slightly popped crimps were enough to make a significant difference. I did run them through the press again but by the time I got to the range they had reopened. DOH! Good help is hard to find...

    I used mostly fold crimps last trip because I had so much trouble roll crimping those Federal hulls. Not sure if others have the same problem. If they are cut right down past the old fold crimp they do okay but if there is any fold crimp left, even after "conditioning" with a home made spin doctor, they just didn't roll crimp well.

    I have to order some hulls from Canadian BPI so will look at those wads too. I also need a couple thousand nitro card wads and hard card wads as well. I want some of those plastic gas seals like uncle dino uses too but last time I tried to order them there was more than a little confusion. I want bunch of felt wads too... I am going to try making "real" Brennekes!

    I've got a plan together to get my rifled choke tube finished up too. Its about time!

    Longbow

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Outer Rondacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    The Adirondacks
    Posts
    1,862
    Great read and nice work. You just made me think about pulling out my old shotty. And reminded me I have some lyman slug moulds I really should sell as I have cast a lifetime supply already. Keep up the good work.

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    Just for fun here's some pics of some of the slugs I shot and some recovered wads. Don't know why I didn't put these in the original post but it was getting long.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC5_.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	24.9 KB 
ID:	216557Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC6.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	27.0 KB 
ID:	216558Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC7.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	26.0 KB 
ID:	216559Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIC8.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	26.7 KB 
ID:	216560

    From left to right:

    - copper tube skirt TC glue filled before then after ~ accuracy wasn't too good but I'll retry these as they have done well before (same nose as small nose band TC 490 gr. below ~ the larger nose or paper patching may work better)
    - 0.678" RB on copper tube skirt ~ same comment as above (slightly different skirt flare but same idea)
    - 2 Nessler Ball (Balle Nessler) clones ~ once again even knurled to bore size they did poorly (I think overhyped during the Crimean war!). These have a small HB with a weird little tit in the middle and thick skirt.
    - full bore TC 565 gr. ~ one of the stars of the last trip
    - 3 Lee 7/8 oz. slugs ~ I'll get faster powder and a better load, these guys should be shooting well but haven't so far
    - wide large diameter nose band 490 gr. HB ~ another star from the last trip
    - small diameter nose band 490 gr. HB ~ did shoot well
    - 520 gr. TC ~ total failure! Still not quite sure why but these just have not done well
    - 2 TC glue skirt slugs from a previous outing ~ these have shot quite well in the past so will be given another chance. These get paper patched up to size. These two went through an 8" diameter tree then into a rocky bank
    - Lee 1 oz. slug with added glue skirt ~ didn't shoot any of these this time but in the past they shot better than plain slug... except the glue skirts can leave the slug even before firing! The slug with the skirt hasn't been fired but the skirt is removable. The two skirts beside it were found on the 100 yard berm. Cold lead and hot melt glue don't bond well.
    - WW AA Red shotcup that was loaded over a gas seal and hard card wad column (using up leftovers) ~ as usual petals sheared/burned. This one had a 0.678" RB in it. Every one I found was damaged; don't do this again!
    - Winchester wad with crumpled petal ~ I found three like this. Not sure form which slugs but Ill have to check my MEC wad guide fingers to see if there is something wrong. I haven't seen this before.
    - 1/8" nitro card wad from under a Nessler ball ~ zoom in and take a look at the swollen center with the dimple in it. The Nesslers are HB with a funny tit in the middle. Hard to believe a nitro card wad would distort that much but so they do under 10,000 or so PSI!
    - 2 hard card wads that were under HB slugs on a previous trip ~ again hard to believe a hard card wad can distort that much which is why we need good wad columns!
    - Claybuster cushion leg used under a 565 gr. full bore slug from two weekends ago ~ accuracy was poor where the same slug loaded over hard card wad column did well last time and note the damaged gas seal
    - Claybuster wad used for wad slug by mistake ~ note damaged gas seal ~ every Claybuster wad I recovered had damaged gas seal where none of the Winchester wads had damaged gas seals

    More lessons learned (relearned):

    - DON'T USE CLAYBUSTER WADS FOR SLUGS!
    - DON'T USE WW AA RED WADS (or cups) FOR SLUGS! Other Winchester wads work well for me but not WW AA Red!
    - make sure that the wad column is solid and dependable because they take a severe beating when you pull the trigger! Wads will distort, push into HB slugs, delaminate, etc... even hard card and nitro card wads!
    - slug/wad fit is important! Very important! ~ I had two almost identical slugs in the TC 490 gr, one with small diameter nose band and one with large diameter nose band. The slug with large diameter nose band was a snugger fit and shot well, the other did not.
    - don't take so many different types of slugs out at one time!

    Not sure if I will get shooting this weekend but I'll be back out there shortly! Got to restest the best slugs and do some load/crimp work.

    Longbow

  9. #9
    Boolit Buddy KrakenFan69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    283
    My use of the CB 1114-12 wad with the Lyman has been excellent. I have recovered many wads for inspection and they almost all show a nice even collapse and no tearing of the petals. I've actually been quite happy with CB wads. Hmmm. What choke was used again?

    Kraken Fan #69

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    I'll have to check the number of the Claybusters I have. They are for 1 oz. shot loads. Oddly the gas seals I cut off and used under the 565 gr. slugs looked great. It is the ones used for Lee slugs and others that didn't do well. Like I said, every one had a damaged gas seal.

    My gun is cylinder bore... or at least the one I shot those in. I have had problems in the past with Claybuster wads and slugs. My gun runs 0.734" bore diameter so a bit large. Maybe that has something to do with it. I'll have to check and see if there are any wads available locally. I usually order because there is little to no local selection.

    So far the best wads I've tried with slugs are the Pacific Verelite. They seem to be tough and good cushion section. Federal wads seem to be popular for slugs so I'll see what's available. I will read back through Ajay's recommendations too and maybe order some BPI wads when I order hulls, card and felt wads.

    Longbow

  11. #11
    Boolit Master Retumbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    743
    I have been using nothing but Claybuster wads for slugs with good results. I have e been using Windjammer, petals cut over HS-6. My 1oz slugs sit on top of two nitro cards. AA hulls.

    @50 yards


  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    Well that's looking good! What slug?

    The Claybusters I have are Winchester clones and have not done well for me at all, and some others have posted similar comments... except Kracken above. Different guns or loads making the difference? Different Claybusters clone?

    I also found that with the Federal hulls my home made roll crimper was a bit tight. Not sure if the Federal hull plastic is thicker or just stiffer but they seem to need a bit more clearance than other hulls I've used to roll over well. That won't affect the wad issue, it is just another variable in the mix. My roll crimps were not good two weeks ago.

    Lots of variables in slug loading. I wish I had better access to components so I could try a few more things, then when it all works be able to get those components easily. I used to shop in the States but since 9/11 that is a no go now.

    Longbow

  13. #13
    Boolit Master Retumbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    743
    People have found that the AA clones are tight where the petals join the wads. People who have had luck usually have a nitro card or two under the Lee slug.

    My trimmed wads and two nitro over shot cards. The petals hit right at the widest part of the Lee 1oz slug

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	kPTqrkd.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	29.8 KB 
ID:	216646

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    I always use nitro card wads under the slugs, and any HB slugs other than Lee are glue filled so solid base. I've had nitro card wads push into HB slugs without filler. Lesson learned.

    That certainly looks like a better wad design than the Winchester clones I have... though the real Winchester wads work well for me.

    Are you roll crimping or fold crimping?

    I was mostly roll crimping with the Fiocchi hulls and had good success, but not so good roll crimping the federal hulls. We'll see now that I've modified the roll crimper.

    Longbow

  15. #15
    In Remembrance bikerbeans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,989
    "Lots of variables in slug loading. I wish I had better access to components so I could try a few more things"

    LB,

    Be careful what you wish for or you will end up like me. I have two plastic storage systems, each with four 4' wide shelves, each unit is 6' tall. Both are completely full of slug reloading components plus I have more slug supplies in my reloading room. Of course I have exactly zero new 12ga hulls, hard cards or x12x seals. I am currently cutting gas seals off 12s3 wads and trimming 3" rem high brass hulls (so they will roll crimp) so I can load slugs for a hunt next month. Seems with slugs you never have the right components and most of the time the "right" components don't work.

    BB

  16. #16
    Boolit Buddy KrakenFan69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    283
    Quote Originally Posted by bikerbeans View Post
    "Seems with slugs you never have the right components and most of the time the "right" components don't work."

    BB
    Ain't that the truth! I'm starting to collect a multitude of hulls, wads, slugs, buckshot, shot, homemade overshot and overpowder cards, Fiiber wads... Still not enough. I continually seem to find load data I would like to try that uses components I don't have.

    *sigh*

    Kraken Fan #69

  17. #17
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    Yes, every time I look at a load and want to try it I can't get that powder, or hull, or wad, or primer or in some cases all of the above! The only primers I can get right now are Federal 209A so for some loads I will have to drop a few % of powder charge as my understanding is that the Federal 209A is "hot" and results in higher pressure than Win 209 or CCi 209. If I'm not near a max pressure load I'm not to worried about that but...

    I guess one benefit of building wad columns using gas seal and card wads is that it isn't hard to get that "stuff" and column height can be tailored to the slug being used... except it is likely going to be full bore then.

    Hmmmmmm... that take me back to the Brenneke Classic again! Oh well.

    Longbow

  18. #18
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    30
    Very interesting testing. With so many variables, it seems to be an art more than a science.

    Thanks for sharing.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,933
    You not far off with that statement Jeremy! I keep saying that slug reloading borders on a black art!

    Not sure why there are so many variables especially hulls. It would be nice if all the manufactures settled on one hull design at least and one primer "heat" as well or maybe two... regular and magnum. That would take some of the variables away. There are still the powder and wad issues but not that much different than metallic cartridge reloading.

    However, it is what it is so gathering up as much reloading info as possible seems to be the solution. No one powder manufacturer/hull manufacture/ ammunition company or whatever is going to put every combination of every component together in a nice reloading manual for us!

    I like loading wad slugs because they are quick and easy to reload but the wad is another variable where with a full bore slug you are building a gas seal and wad column behind it so likely more consistent and easy to get all the "stuff' for.

    I dunno! I feel like I am starting all over again with just the change in hulls!

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    5,283
    longbow,

    Ever use a cork wad under the ball? I use a 1/4" cork 20 ga. under my roundball 12 ga. and it works good for me.

    725
    Last edited by 725; 03-30-2018 at 06:02 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check