Lee PrecisionTitan ReloadingPBcastcoMidSouth Shooters Supply
RepackboxRotoMetals2Load DataReloading Everything
Inline Fabrication Wideners
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: I am considering a Ruger GP100 22lr. Need opinions from users.

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699

    I am considering a Ruger GP100 22lr. Need opinions from users.

    I am considering a Ruger GP100 in 22lr.
    I would like some feedback from people who have owned them and shot them enough to know just how accurate they are and what problems to look out for.
    I like the 10 shot capacity and the price. I have no experience with them.

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    224
    Tazman-I have one and it is totally reliable but, and it's a big but. Mine needed lots of work. First it had to go back to Ruger for timing. The throats would not line up with the barrel. The hammer dragged the frame so bad that it was hard to cock in single action. Now in all honesty, Ruger made these issues right so I only have one major beef. I had Doug Guy clean the throats up but they still measured .2267 from the factory.

    Now for me, that is unacceptable. Doug Guy does great work but even with all his skill, He can't add metal. Because I broke my leg month ago, I haven't made it to the range to test fire. before the cylinder was evened out I was able to get half-way decent groups with CCI SV, The old bulk pack CCI AR tac and the 2017 CCI christmas bulk pack. This, only because the driving bands on all of these measure .225-.2255.
    I own, shoot and enjoy two GP100"s and they are my most used handguns. My only advice would be to examine as many GP100 22's as you can find and really go over them. I was so excited to find one, that I screwed up and bought first and examined later.
    Kirk

  3. #3
    Boolit Master Drm50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    SE Ohio
    Posts
    2,361
    I had a SP & GP in 22lr. Both bought used, didn't impress me at all and wasn't interested enough
    in them to have any work done on them. I'm behind on prices on new guns but I believe a m17
    shooter could be found for same money. In a revolver they are hard to beat.

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    The S&W 17 is my first choice but I thought the current prices were very high. Perhaps I am wrong about that.
    My experiences with S&W revolvers have been uniformly good to great. I own a couple of K frame revolvers already, just not in 22lr.
    I guess I may need to rethink the GP100. I have no desire to purchase a gun I will need to work on to get properly functional.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    West Tennessee
    Posts
    2,157
    I looked at the GP100 22lr because I have one in 327FM that I just love. I didn't buy because I have a S&W 617 10 shooter already. It was OK from the factory, but really shines since I recut the forcing cone. Got speed loaders to boot! You'd be surprised how much ammo a10 shooter can eat with speed loaders and loading blocks!

    I mite add, the 10 shoot cylinders become quite hard to eject after several cycles, but Q-tip with some CLP works wonders. They also seem to be like a cast iron skillet in that the more there used the longer the stickiness takes.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    4,192
    Quote Originally Posted by tazman View Post
    The S&W 17 is my first choice but I thought the current prices were very high. Perhaps I am wrong about that.
    My experiences with S&W revolvers have been uniformly good to great. I own a couple of K frame revolvers already, just not in 22lr.
    I guess I may need to rethink the GP100. I have no desire to purchase a gun I will need to work on to get properly functional.
    I thought I posted to this thread. . .hmmm. Pre-senior moment, I suppose.

    When you consider the relative rarity of the K and J frame .22's compared to their .38 brethren, and what they really are when you get right down to it, the $600-$800 they seem to be bringing is not really all that outlandish. I took that mild kick in the shorts for both my pre-18 and my 63. I do not regret either.

    I love both the GP and SP format in the .357. While I can't speak at all on the .22 versions, I mentally start counting the number of consecutive miracles that have to go into properly boring and timing as many chambers as they want to put in them. What was wrong with six - other than perhaps it doesn't conveniently use even rows of rounds out of a box?
    WWJMBD?

    In the Land of Oz, we cast with wheel weight and 2% Tin, Man.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Outer Rondacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    The Adirondacks
    Posts
    1,857
    I was not so pleased with mine. I ended up with this instead. https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/...Synthetic+Grip

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    I already own a couple of very accurate semi-auto pistols in 22lr. I was just wanting a very accurate revolver in 22lr.

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master
    rockrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,310
    Good friend bought one a few months ago. He told me that at first he was really happy with it, except for the trigger pull. The more he shot it, he found that 1 round per cylinderful wouldn't fire and when he tried high speed ammo, the thing was putting out enough gas pass the cylinder gap that it was going under his shooting glasses into his left eye. He quit shooting it and I believe has contacted Ruger about sending it back for a bit of "work".

  10. #10
    Boolit Buddy Cue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Zebulon, NC
    Posts
    141
    Not the GP100 but I have the 8 shot SP101 in .22 that I have been happy with.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master Jack Stanley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South of the north pole in the land of the falling waters
    Posts
    4,070
    Quote Originally Posted by tazman View Post
    I already own a couple of very accurate semi-auto pistols in 22lr. I was just wanting a very accurate revolver in 22lr.
    Taz , I think you should have a high quality .22 revolver , they are a huge pile of fun . That said however the one you are considering a friend of mine calls them " the best factory assembled do-it-yourself kits on the market " The witnesses that have posted here seem to confirm that .

    Jack
    Buy it cheap and stack it deep , you may need it !

    Black Rifles Matter

  12. #12
    Boolit Master Drm50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    SE Ohio
    Posts
    2,361
    I just sold a 617 10shot S&W. I shot a couple boxes through it for grins and found it shot as well
    and smooth as my 18s. I'm not into SS guns and this one had the lock is reason I offed it. The
    Ruger SPs & GPs are quality revolvers but don't stack up to S&W just by method of manufacture
    I bought SP in 22 when first out and was very disappointed with it. I did the same thing with the
    Sig Mosquito when it was first out. I paid premium money to get one and ended up with a $400
    piece of junk. I have 9 S&W 22 revolvers and one M41 auto, but am always looking for the perfect
    Country Western 22 pistol to carry everyday while engaged in things other than shooting. Something to save S&W from everyday wear and low maintenance pistol that is accurate enough
    to be worth carrying.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master wonderwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,649
    I would seek out a 617 and in fact have been keeping an eye out for one, the Ruger double action option would be my second choice. If I was just wanting a revolver in .22 I would look at the single six. But I would like a double action. I own a very nice K22, but it shows its age and after 3 or 4 cylinders gets VERY hard to eject.
    My firearms project blog

  14. #14
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rochester, NH
    Posts
    1,210
    Another vote for a good older S&W 17 or 18... At one point when I was doing a lot of basic pistol courses I had 15 Ks and Js. Over the last two years I have thinned the heard down to 2 Ks and 2 Js...

    The two Ks are a 1952 vintage 17 6" and a 60s vintage 18 that I added a .22 Magnum cylinder to. The Js are a 70s vintage 35 6" and 63...both have had .22 Magnum cylinders added.

    Just saw a early 17 in the box...looked like a 1950s vintage. K200XXX was the serial number range..the shop only wanted $600 for it..thought for a gun that old it was a decent bargain... Newington Gun Exchange, Newington, Ct. if anyone is interested.

    Bob

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master FergusonTO35's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Boonesborough, KY
    Posts
    6,898
    Between the two, I would say SP-101 hands down. Alot more problems with the GP-100 .22 reported on the Ruger forum. For the money, the Single Six is probably the best rimfire revolver going. I just sold one that was absolutely beaten to death by a previous owner but shot as good as any handgun I've ever tried. My local shop has a special deal on the S&W J-frame kit gun for $619.00 right now. Neat guns but way overpriced when you consider you can get a .38 Special for $339.00 in the same display case. I understand the .22 has adjustable sights and is more involved to make, but nearly twice the price?
    Currently casting and loading: .32 Auto, .380 Auto, .38 Special, 9X19, .357 Magnum, .257 Roberts, 6.5 Creedmoor, .30 WCF, .308 WCF.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Central Virginia
    Posts
    7,439
    Taz,
    It has been my experience with rimfire revolvers that it is very difficult to find an excellent one.

    It is far easier to get a .22 pistol to shoot accurately than a .22 revolver. It's not impossible, just more difficult.
    Rimfire .22 cartridges headspace on the rim and use a heeled, externally lubricated bullet. Slight variations in the way the chamber is cut have big influence over the way the gun will shoot. It's bad enough when the gun only has 1 chamber but it is a real trick to get 6 or 10 chambers cut correctly and all alike.
    Then you toss in chamber throats, forcing cone and cylinder timing and you have a few more variables that need to be accounted for.

    I've shot and owned some outstanding .22 revolvers. They are not impossible to find but they are more difficult to find when compared to pistols that have a single chamber integral with the barrel.

    Getting a .22 pistol that shoots well is like trying to get a couple of planets to line up. Getting a .22 revolver to shoot well is like getting ALL of the planets to line up.

    I'm a huge Ruger fan but their current quality is not up to their old standards. The chances of getting a new GP-100 chambered in .22 LR that is free of flaws is very slim. The GP-100 could be an excellent .22 revolver IF it was manufactured carefully. I'm sad to comment that I don't believe Ruger is interested in doing it right these days.

    I'm going to agree with the others that advised to seek out an older S&W.

  17. #17
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    I am currently out of the market for a 22 revolver. I have decided to wait and see if I can find an older S&W at a decent price. Maybe one that I can try out at a range at some point.
    Not a big hurry. It will show up when it shows up.

  18. #18
    Boolit Master OldBearHair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Conroe TEXAS
    Posts
    671
    I bought a Ruger 22 convertible (22Magnum) in Thule Greenland in 1963. Wore it on my hip 5 years working cattle at the NM Boys Ranch as Livestock Manager. Put a handmade grip on the left side with a special thumb placement that reduced my groups considerably. You had to aim with the front sight below the rear sight for close distances. I made quite a few really good shots with the revolver and sometimes with a witness standing by. One of those was a spinning coyote at the end of a long 15 acre field. Can't show the picture because my daughter in law has it. She really shoots it well. Never had an issue with it. Now a Bersa Thunder Stainless 22 does the duty needed with never a problem except for a lost mag spring for a few days. Fixed it where it wouldn't get lost again. Purchased secondhand Bersa blued gun that broke and was replaced by the company with the new Stainless one.
    Last edited by OldBearHair; 04-18-2018 at 10:50 AM. Reason: sp

  19. #19
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Center Point, Texas
    Posts
    605
    My vote would be for a vintage S&W. I have a few of them and all are pretty accurate. Have a 10 shot 617 I like too but it has never shot as well as some of the older 5 screw guns. Worst revolver I've owned was a single six. I tried getting it to shoot for awhile and gave up on it. Early single sixes in 22LR only were supposed to be pretty good but the convertibles all seem to have over sized bores to accommodate the 22 mag.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master FergusonTO35's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Boonesborough, KY
    Posts
    6,898
    The Single Sixes I have owned were as accurate as any other handgun I have tried. I imagine the soft .22 LR slugs easily bump up to bore size by pressure.
    Currently casting and loading: .32 Auto, .380 Auto, .38 Special, 9X19, .357 Magnum, .257 Roberts, 6.5 Creedmoor, .30 WCF, .308 WCF.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check