MidSouth Shooters SupplyRotoMetals2Snyders JerkyLoad Data
Lee PrecisionReloading EverythingWidenersRepackbox
Inline Fabrication Titan Reloading
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50

Thread: Swiss or Olde Eynsford users?

  1. #21
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by rfd View Post
    if i was into cap guns, most any brand of powder would do me fine. but i only use flintlocks and that's where a better powder (swiss!) is really best, particularly since i use one horn of 3f for both tube and pan.
    What makes it better in a flintlock vs a caplock?

  2. #22
    Banned


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NJ via TX
    Posts
    3,876
    it's all about what goes in the pan. swiss is just better, particularly if you don't wanna use a separate primer of 4f, and want it all to happen with a single 3f horn. plus, swiss just offers more horsepower and less fouling. of all the mass produced bp's, none are better than swiss. if ya can get it. getting any black powder is just going to get harder here in the USA ... signs of the times.

    3f in the tube and pan, good ignition in a smoothie .62 bore ...


  3. #23
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by rfd View Post
    it's all about what goes in the pan. swiss is just better, particularly if you don't wanna use a separate primer of 4f, and want it all to happen with a single 3f horn. plus, swiss just offers more horsepower and less fouling. of all the mass produced bp's, none are better than swiss. if ya can get it. getting any black powder is just going to get harder here in the USA ... signs of the times.
    Hmmm... On the traditional forum there are many who use standard powders and prime with 3F without issue. Can’t say I’ve read of this.

    As to fouling who wouldn’t want one that leaves less?

    And I get the horsepower issue as long as it’s a muzzleloading rifle or paper punching. It’s not a big deal there. But hunting with a handgun is another story for sure. But if I can use 15% less powder and get 35% more velocity I’m sold. And to use far less to achieve the same performance is how much powder and at what cost?

  4. #24
    Banned


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NJ via TX
    Posts
    3,876
    i have no problem pan priming with good ol' goex 2f, and have even gone down to 1-1/2f of goex. but for me, swiss 3f is just flat out Better, Faster, Cleaner. so i don't mind the swiss $$ up charge. yes, some are concerned with scales of economy, and that might be a compromise, and that's fine, it's about choices and the amount of discretionary pocketbook jingle.

  5. #25
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by rfd View Post
    i have no problem pan priming with good ol' goex 2f, and have even gone down to 1-1/2f of goex. but for me, swiss 3f is just flat out Better, Faster, Cleaner. so i don't mind the swiss $$ up charge. yes, some are concerned with scales of economy, and that might be a compromise, and that's fine, it's about choices and the amount of discretionary pocketbook jingle.
    No doubt.

    Have you tried Olde Eynsford? Most people who have have switched. Only one who has compared it to Swiss wasn’t quite as happy but also noted it was close and far better than other powders he had tried. It certainly costs less, is likely to be more available in a store as it’s made by Goex, and supports American jobs.

    I have not tried Swiss but figure I’ll have to one of these days. I’m not so sure I’d notice a difference with my offhand pistol shooting but maybe it would make a difference in my rifle. And using more energetic powders I’ve also considered trying 2F which would still well outpace the standard 3F powders and give suitable performance from my revolvers to feel comfortable hunting with them.

  6. #26
    Banned


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NJ via TX
    Posts
    3,876
    yes, i went through almost a pound of OE 3f in flintlock rifles and smoothbores, good stuff indeed, better than standard goex.

    however, swiss still has an edge over OE, at least for me - no matter what lot number of swiss i use.

  7. #27
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by rfd View Post
    yes, i went through almost a pound of OE 3f in flintlock rifles and smoothbores, good stuff indeed, better than standard goex.

    however, swiss still has an edge over OE, at least for me - no matter what lot number of swiss i use.
    Seems as though you were one/the one then who had tried both and still preferred Swiss.

  8. #28
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quite frankly I’d need to see a remarkable difference to switch to Swiss. As is I still need to work on an accurate load for my rifle as it’s merely just broken in now and I finally broke down and got spectacles. With a ball I wasn’t doing so well at 50 yds (3-4” groups) but then I was using Pyrodex and not adjusting powder charge (70 grns), patches, balls (I likely won’t and will stick to my .490” mold), or lubes (wife only allowed me to use her grape seed oil. Gave me a real mean look when I grabbed her olive oil and she asked why). Now the 320 grn REAL was another story with that powder charge with the few I tried.

  9. #29
    Banned


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    NJ via TX
    Posts
    3,876
    lots might depend on the bp application - bpcr, flint or cap - then add in whatever subjective (objective?) personal opinions to the mix. with my trad ml rifles they're all slow twist patched balls, and the patched balls and shot loads for the smoothies - swiss 3f. for the bpcr rollers and sharps it's hands down swiss 1-1/2f. it's all good, they all go bang one way or t'other.

  10. #30
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by rodwha View Post
    So I went back and got the cost of Grafs powder (rebranded Schuetzen) since it’s the one with the weight and velocity shown that I used in place of standard Goex, which isn’t exactly accurate as we don’t have a listed weight for it, and Graf’s powder is cheaper than standard Goex.

    At $15.99/lb the cost per shot is a mere $0.064 per 30 grn volume of powder and is certainly cheaper than the others if bought from Grafs.
    I looked at prices from Powder Inc -- dont know how old and I think they included ship and hazmat for 5 lb order - Swiss 34.70, Wano/scheutzen 29.75, Ole E 30.50, GoexFFF 29.10 ------at those prices I wouldnt even think about Wano - should be way more difference between it and Swiss I thought . All academic for me - we get the choice of Wano or Swiss - can buy Wano - per kilo - around $65 - $70 and Swiss high side of $100 (dont know exactly how high) - the split is $23 versus $37+ (per pound - your money) -- makes for a more choosey choice -

  11. #31
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    At that price difference it does make a bigger difference. It’s rather outrageous and hard for me to understand how they can stay in business with prices as high as that. The price you show for Wano is nearly what Grafs sells Swiss for.

  12. #32
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by indian joe View Post
    I looked at prices from Powder Inc -- dont know how old and I think they included ship and hazmat for 5 lb order - Swiss 34.70, Wano/scheutzen 29.75, Ole E 30.50, GoexFFF 29.10 ------at those prices I wouldnt even think about Wano - should be way more difference between it and Swiss I thought . All academic for me - we get the choice of Wano or Swiss - can buy Wano - per kilo - around $65 - $70 and Swiss high side of $100 (dont know exactly how high) - the split is $23 versus $37+ (per pound - your money) -- makes for a more choosey choice -
    Fedex is delivering tuesday a case of OE 1 1/2 F /2F for the total sum of 497.50 from Powder inc /Nice folks ! Think that"s about $17.00 or so ,that"s pretty current pricing /Ed

  13. #33
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    Fedex is delivering tuesday a case of OE 1 1/2 F /2F for the total sum of 497.50 from Powder inc /Nice folks ! Think that"s about $17.00 or so ,that"s pretty current pricing /Ed
    I’m a bit curious what other powders (BP) you were well enough acquainted with that you’ve tried and how they compared.

  14. #34
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by rodwha View Post
    I’m a bit curious what other powders (BP) you were well enough acquainted with that you’ve tried and how they compared.
    This case is for my C Sharps 45/70, 15lbs 1 1/2F and 10 Lbs 2F . I shoot long (for me)750 yds across the street on club property and used O.E 2F and 3F when I ran out of 2Fall last year but never tried 1 1/2 F . Mostly P.P. with a Baco 443-530 Elliptical but just finished a bunch of Postell boolits for tomorrow if the sun ever comes out .O .E . seems to do a lot better than Goex for me and that is all the experience I have with BP in cartridge or muzzle loaders /Ed

  15. #35
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward View Post
    This case is for my C Sharps 45/70, 15lbs 1 1/2F and 10 Lbs 2F . I shoot long (for me)750 yds across the street on club property and used O.E 2F and 3F when I ran out of 2Fall last year but never tried 1 1/2 F . Mostly P.P. with a Baco 443-530 Elliptical but just finished a bunch of Postell boolits for tomorrow if the sun ever comes out .O .E . seems to do a lot better than Goex for me and that is all the experience I have with BP in cartridge or muzzle loaders /Ed
    So why did you feel OE was better than standard Goex for you? What made it better?

    My decision to forgo any other powders was the revolver performance. But I’ve seen responses from shooters a few times that claim what they get from standard Goex is excellent and not worth jacking with. And I get that to a degree when you figure what all they went through to find an accurate load. But would they have been happier had things worked out differently and ended up working with Swiss or Olde E? Many of these guys are older and began well before Swiss was readily available and Olde as was created.

  16. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Boncarbo,Colorado
    Posts
    706
    OE, cleaner, higher velocity, excellent consistent SD between shots.

  17. #37
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    The Black Hills of South Dakota, USA
    Posts
    161

    Swiss and GOEX

    Quote Originally Posted by ofitg View Post
    Can any of you Swiss or OE users tell me what muzzle velocities you get with 20 grains of powder and round balls from a .36 revolver? Thanks in advance
    Today I shot a cylinder-full each of Swiss 3F and GOEX 3F in my Colt's 1851 Navy. I used .375 balls with a Wonder Wad split in half thickness and a dab of 85/15 Crisco/beeswax UNDER each ball. I did not try 20 grains of powder as per the request but I did use 22 grains of each type of powder (my usual load, so I used it instead of 20 grains). The average velocity I got with the Swiss powder for the cylinder was 926.3 fps (925 in real life) on my chronograph and the average for the GOEX powder was 879.9 fps (880 in real life). I did not shoot at a target today but only shot for the chronograph. I hope this data is helpful; it does however only represent six shots of each load.

  18. #38
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,583
    Surprising data!

  19. #39
    Boolit Buddy ofitg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by Golfswithwolves View Post
    Today I shot a cylinder-full each of Swiss 3F and GOEX 3F in my Colt's 1851 Navy. I used .375 balls with a Wonder Wad split in half thickness and a dab of 85/15 Crisco/beeswax UNDER each ball. I did not try 20 grains of powder as per the request but I did use 22 grains of each type of powder (my usual load, so I used it instead of 20 grains). The average velocity I got with the Swiss powder for the cylinder was 926.3 fps (925 in real life) on my chronograph and the average for the GOEX powder was 879.9 fps (880 in real life). I did not shoot at a target today but only shot for the chronograph. I hope this data is helpful; it does however only represent six shots of each load.
    Thanks, that is excellent data.
    "Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto."

    - Thomas Jefferson


  20. #40
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by Golfswithwolves View Post
    The average velocity I got with the Swiss powder for the cylinder was 926.3 fps (925 in real life) on my chronograph and the average for the GOEX powder was 879.9 fps (880 in real life). I did not shoot at a target today but only shot for the chronograph. I hope this data is helpful; it does however only represent six shots of each load.
    That's a 5% difference [45fps delta, ~900fps avg V: I love it when the math can be done in your head! ]; quite a far cry from the "30-35% faster" quoted at the start of this thread!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check