RotoMetals2Titan ReloadingWidenersInline Fabrication
Snyders JerkyReloading EverythingRepackboxMidSouth Shooters Supply
Load Data Lee Precision
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 116

Thread: Brass pressure problems in Mauser build

  1. #61
    Boolit Grand Master


    swheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,471
    Enjoy the Whelen, it's a good cartridge!
    Charter Member #148

  2. #62
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by kfd518 View Post
    Gentlemen thank you for all your assistance, now to get the rest of these formed up. Will keep everyone up to date on the final conclusions after formed and performance level determined.
    From my conversation with hornady they did not seem to worried about the extra velocity and they have to be aware that this stuff is being used it over the hill actions. The rep did say they actually figure on getting I believe 85 fps faster than what they label as. Kind of curious to see what it's leverevolution clocks in my 30-30.
    That leverevolution really works. Larry Gibson did a big test on it one that I remember. You could search for here.

  3. #63
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    did I really write ejector?
    slap.. eh I ain't fixin it.

  4. #64
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by runfiverun View Post
    did I really write ejector?
    slap.. eh I ain't fixin it.
    Now had it been a more modern push feed you'd been right runfiverun

  5. #65
    Boolit Grand Master


    swheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,471
    Lamar the Devil made me do it! I had a really good idea what you meant, sorry man.
    Charter Member #148

  6. #66
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    was probably half thinking about the Bergara rifle I been talking Waco into buying for a couple of days now.
    he finally bought it, so we should be seeing some pretty small group pictures from him shortly.

  7. #67
    Boolit Buddy kfd518's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by tomme boy View Post
    That brass looks stretched in the second and 4th pics. See the ring. Are you sure your chamber is straight and not wallowed out on one side? Did you hand ream it?
    I know this is response #2 to this post but in investigating this further, I've determined that swollen spot is where the claw extractor pushes the round against the chamber. I've measure this spot over and over on several cases and it comes up to .4680 all the way around multiple cases. Now this being bulged out where it is I'm able to locate where it is in relationship to the extractor due to the little divots my bolt face leaves in the primer. But the measurement tells me the chamber is round within .0005"

  8. #68
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by kfd518 View Post
    I know this is response #2 to this post but in investigating this further, I've determined that swollen spot is where the claw extractor pushes the round against the chamber. I've measure this spot over and over on several cases and it comes up to .4680 all the way around multiple cases. Now this being bulged out where it is I'm able to locate where it is in relationship to the extractor due to the little divots my bolt face leaves in the primer. But the measurement tells me the chamber is round within .0005"
    I thought it was an optical illusion more or less.

  9. #69
    Boolit Buddy kfd518's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    161
    Well one side is a smooth line head to shoulder extractor side is bulged out from being pushed over by the extractor against the chamber wall. But the measurement is concentric

  10. #70
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Well there goes out the window for controled feed lovers over the push feed with their ejector pushing the cartridge to one side in the chamber and not helping in accuracy. Appears the Mauser claw might do that too!!!

  11. #71
    Boolit Buddy kfd518's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    161
    Well yeah when you rotate the bolt to close it the opening in the face rotates to the left side of the receiver. Only way to have something dead center in the chamber is a falling block with an extractor that rises up when the block falls. Even then unless perfectly reamed chamber has perfectly formed brass it's not going to sit dead straight. Whoever said a controlled feed doesn't push a round against the left even slightly only has semi controlled feed. The extractor should move about .004" out when a cartridge is fed under it . The only way around it is a deeper extractor groove in the brass and then once again its only semi controlled. If you stop the bolt it will fall out on extraction if it does not have enough tension.

  12. #72
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by kfd518 View Post
    Well yeah when you rotate the bolt to close it the opening in the face rotates to the left side of the receiver. Only way to have something dead center in the chamber is a falling block with an extractor that rises up when the block falls. Even then unless perfectly reamed chamber has perfectly formed brass it's not going to sit dead straight. Whoever said a controlled feed doesn't push a round against the left even slightly only has semi controlled feed. The extractor should move about .004" out when a cartridge is fed under it . The only way around it is a deeper extractor groove in the brass and then once again its only semi controlled. If you stop the bolt it will fall out on extraction if it does not have enough tension.
    Or neck size only!!!

  13. #73
    Boolit Buddy kfd518's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    161
    Neck size only won't help this situation, you can't control the body orientation of the brass when it loads in the chamber unless loading one at a time. Neck can only support it so much.... the bulge is still on one side of the cartridge but even all the way around. Hopefully I'm making sense.

  14. #74
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by kfd518 View Post
    Neck size only won't help this situation, you can't control the body orientation of the brass when it loads in the chamber unless loading one at a time. Neck can only support it so much.... the bulge is still on one side of the cartridge but even all the way around. Hopefully I'm making sense.
    When you're talking of the bulge do you mean the case expansion near the web? Here's what a bulge is to me, it's protusion at some point not uniform with the rest of the case expansion. Case is not even all around.

  15. #75
    Banned

    tomme boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Clinton, Iowa
    Posts
    5,200
    Most every Ruger and Mauser does this. I was always under the assumption that it was from a oversized chamber and the extractor pushing on the case head seemed to always show this.

    I put together a few mausers that showed this issue. I set the chamber back and it went away. I have picked up thousands of pieces of brass at our local range. And I could always tell what the gun was when I seen brass like this and it was always a Ruger or a mauser. And another thing I noticed was that Win brass seemed to do this more than other types. The base of the brass in front of the extractor groove was always a little smaller than other makers. Next it was Federal.

    With that smaller brass and a loose chamber this is what happens

  16. #76
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    that might be why some Guy's under cut their claw type extractors.

  17. #77
    Banned

    tomme boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Clinton, Iowa
    Posts
    5,200
    Could be. But I think it is more of a brass manufacturer issue too. US manufacturers use a too small case head on some of the European cases. They were using the US based head of .470'' instead of whatever 6.5 Swede called for. And 303 Brit is WAY too small compared to MIL brass.

    Measure some case heads right above the extractor grove and see what you get. I bet it will be around 0.460". I have not measured any in a few years so please let me know what you find.

  18. #78
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by tomme boy View Post
    Could be. But I think it is more of a brass manufacturer issue too. US manufacturers use a too small case head on some of the European cases. They were using the US based head of .470'' instead of whatever 6.5 Swede called for. And 303 Brit is WAY too small compared to MIL brass.

    Measure some case heads right above the extractor grove and see what you get. I bet it will be around 0.460". I have not measured any in a few years so please let me know what you find.
    That's why when you have an undersize case such as you mention the first time you fire them you wrap a 1/8th inch wide strip of Scotch Tape around the head right in front of the extractor groove. You make the strip of tape long enough to insure a snug fit in the chamber. These must be finger seated and it's a beat, but it lets the case sweel evenly all the ways around.

  19. #79
    Boolit Buddy kfd518's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by tomme boy View Post
    Could be. But I think it is more of a brass manufacturer issue too. US manufacturers use a too small case head on some of the European cases. They were using the US based head of .470'' instead of whatever 6.5 Swede called for. And 303 Brit is WAY too small compared to MIL brass.

    Measure some case heads right above the extractor grove and see what you get. I bet it will be around 0.460". I have not measured any in a few years so please let me know what you find.
    I agree 100% all diameter dimensions are smaller than what I would like to see but that is most likely due to lawyers wanting things to be just so, for liability problems these days. Most cartridges nor are made in the bottom half of the allowances. Combination of lawyers wanting things their way and the pockets to be filled not wanting to loose a penny due to a cartridge not "fitting" a chamber that was teamed with a reamer that should have been reground or replaced long before it was. Loads and load data have decreased by leaps and bounds for most cartridges for what I feel is the same reason.

  20. #80
    Boolit Buddy kfd518's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    161
    Well I switched powders on my load I went with power pro 2000 mr starting load of 60 gr and worked up to 63 gr at 2625 fps with SD of 12.5 fps. This was only a 3 shot group. I will load more of this load and see if the SD holds. Making progress now.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check