RepackboxTitan ReloadingInline FabricationMidSouth Shooters Supply
Reloading EverythingRotoMetals2Lee PrecisionWideners
Load Data
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Unexpected result using magnum primer

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    144

    Unexpected result using magnum primer

    .350 Rem., Lyman 350447 (250 gr.), paper patched w/ green bar printer paper, ~21.3 gr H-4198. Mild midrange load, about 1200 fps. Some of my other loads about like this (but with a lighter bullet) were burning a little dirty, so I wondered if using a magnum primer might clean things up a bit. As it happens, this load was pretty clean either way, but ...

    Same day, same time, same rifle, same old Oehler 35 gun club chrono --

    • standard primer, 3 rounds: 1254, 1228, 1238 (avg. 1240 fps)
    • magnum primer, 3 rounds: 1169, 1219, 1214 (avg. 1201 fps)

    Not a typo. The same load with a magnum primer was slower than with a standard primer.

    How about that.

  2. #2
    Boolit Master




    Scharfschuetze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    3,349
    That's not uncommon. I've had it happen a few times when developing various loads. Goes against one's intuition.
    Keep your powder dry,

    Scharf

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Casa Grande, AZ
    Posts
    5,526
    I was always taught to lower the load by 1 gr when using a magnum primer in place of a standard primer. I guess there are all kinds of myths.

  4. #4
    Boolit Buddy tranders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    229
    I would like to hear some more theories on this.

  5. #5
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    The magnum primer is supposed to give better/hotter ignition. It may cause the powder charge to act as a slightly faster burn rate powder. This would give slightly higher pressure with slightly lower velocities.

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master OS OK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    El Dorado County, N. Ca.
    Posts
    6,234
    Never have seen anything like this...have seen where a magnum primer would increase FPS only marginally but didn't give it much thought after that.

    My first reaction would have been..."How the heck did I mix up the primers, I obviously screwed up somehow!"
    a m e r i c a n p r a v d a

    Be a Patriot . . . expose their lies!

    “In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” G. Orwell

  7. #7
    Boolit Grand Master
    rintinglen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Orange, VA NOW
    Posts
    6,490
    One of anything proves nothing: Jesus rose from the dead but that is not the statistical average. Three shots don't tell us much more than one.

    With only a three shot average, there is not enough difference between the two to definitively state one way or the other. Off the top of my head and without recourse to a TI-83, I think you would need a difference of at least 50 before it becomes significant.

    But it still is pretty odd.
    _________________________________________________It's not that I can't spell: it is that I can't type.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, NY 14808
    Posts
    2,163
    Throw out the first result for each string and they are a lot closer.
    Micah 6:8
    He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?

    "I don't have hobbies - I'm developing a robust post-apocalyptic skill set"
    I may be discharged and retired but I'm sure I did not renounce the oath that I solemnly swore!

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master


    swheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,471
    I would guess the magnum primer is moving the bullet forward enough to increase the combustion chamber size at ignition, lowering pressure slightly.
    Charter Member #148

  10. #10
    Boolit Buddy tranders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by swheeler View Post
    I would guess the magnum primer is moving the bullet forward enough to increase the combustion chamber size at ignition, lowering pressure slightly.
    That makes sense. Some of the inline muzzleloader guys found this out with standard 209 primers.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,911
    So basically, magnum primers make slow powers faster

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master

    Wayne Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hampton Roads, Virginia
    Posts
    13,617
    Some possible light on the matter - from John Haviland, Rifle, March 2006 article on the 30-06:

    In the past riflemaker Charlie Sisk also thought the problem was a bad scope or a poor barrel. "I can't tell you haw many barrels I've changed over the years when the wrong primer was probably to blame all along for the inaccuracy," he said.

    The first sign that primers may be causing the a problem with accuracy is a group looks like two distinct groups with a vertical spread between them. Sisk discovered that when he started using pressure-testing equipment a couple of years ago. A customer's new rifle clustered bullets high and low on a target. Sisk hooked the rifle up to his pressure equipment and found the loads varied up to 12,000 psi in pressure.

    "After awhile a pattern emerged and you could predit if a round's pressure was high or low by where a bullet landed on the target or where a bullet hit on the target by looking at the pressure reading", he said. Bullets hit low from loads that developed the highest pressure, while low pressure loads threw their bullets high. Sisk said that there was little difference in velocity between the cartridges that developed high and low pressure. So looking at only the chronograph results indicated the load was a good one, although it's accuracy was dismal. "Those swings in pressure probably changed something in the barrel vibration and caused the inaccuracy", he said.
    Wayne the Shrink

    There is no 'right' that requires me to work for you or you to work for me!

  13. #13
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,300
    gunwonk

    What exactly were the Mke/numbers of the primers used?
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  14. #14
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    What exactly were the Mke/numbers of the primers used?
    Standard primer was Winchester WLR.
    Magnum primer was Remington 9 1/2 M.

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,300
    Quote Originally Posted by gunwonk View Post
    Standard primer was Winchester WLR.
    Magnum primer was Remington 9 1/2 M.
    There in is the probable difference.......

    Magnum primers were made to have a higher "brissance" to ignite ball powders and large volume of very slow burning extruded powders. They have harder to ignite retardents on them. The Winchester WLR, while not listed as a magnum prmer, is considered ny many, myself included, to be a magnum level primer as it was developed with a high brissence to ignite Winchesters BR748, BR760 and BR780 ball powders. Thus it is not surprising that it gave higher ignition than the Remington 9 1/2M. I find the WLR to be even a bit hotter than the CCI 250. The Winchester WLRM ranks right up there with Federal's 215M primer. A comparison between the WLR and WLRM or the Remington 9 1/2 and the 9 1/2M would have probably given the results expected.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  16. #16
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Near the Keg
    Posts
    242
    Been using Federal Magnum SPP and Federal SPP primers in 9mm for USPSA (heavy 147gr and fast powders). Shooting through my CZ Accushadow, I notice no difference in practical accuracy, a nominal 15-20fps velocity gain, but I notice that the Magnum primers always give me a lower standard deviation over the chronograph. Whatever Federal I can find is what I use. My 2 cents.
    Alcohol Inventory Reduction Specialist (Journeyman Level)

  17. #17
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    The Winchester WLR, while not listed as a magnum prmer, is considered ny many, myself included, to be a magnum level primer as it was developed with a high brissence to ignite Winchesters BR748, BR760 and BR780 ball powders. Thus it is not surprising that it gave higher ignition than the Remington 9 1/2M. I find the WLR to be even a bit hotter than the CCI 250. The Winchester WLRM ranks right up there with Federal's 215M primer. A comparison between the WLR and WLRM or the Remington 9 1/2 and the 9 1/2M would have probably given the results expected.
    Interesting. Thanks!

    Dunno whether this has appeared here before, but I once ran across the following table of energy content for CCI primers (might be a pic from a Speer reloading manual):
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CCI-primer-energy-1280x854.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	49.4 KB 
ID:	202191
    Do you know of any similar hard information available for other primers?

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N edge of D/FW Metromess
    Posts
    10,502
    FWIW the standard primer seems to give the lower ES in your small sample.
    Endowment Life Member NRA, Life Member TSRA, Member WACA, NRA Whittington Center, BBHC
    Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
    I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
    Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master


    swheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,471
    Primer Testing Reference

    This testing was done to try and rank primers by power (brisance).

    Primer tester1.JPG (43461 bytes) This is the home made tester. The shot is fired against a weight which in turn moves a pointer. The pointer remains at the highest point of the shot.

    Primer tester2.JPG (37043 bytes) This shows the pointer after a shot has been fired. In this case, it was a Federal large rifle magnum

    NOTE: This data is reference only. This is on a DMS (don't mean squat) scale. It is relative to this set of tests and this tester. Take them with a grain of salt and as a guide only. Most of the tests were of 100 or more primers. A few were of 50 when limited amounts were available.

    Ranked in order of power

    Large Rifle = LR, Large Rifle Magnum = LRM, Large pistol =LP,

    Brand/type Power Average Range Std. Dev

    1 Fed Match GM215M 6.12 5.23-6.8 .351

    2 Federal 215 LRM 5.69 5.2-6.5 .4437

    3 CCI 250 LRM 5.66 4.5-7.4 .4832

    4 Winchester WLRM 5.45 5.1-6.0 .2046

    5 Remington 9 1/2 LRM 5.09 3.5-6.75 .6641

    6 Winchester WLR 4.8 4.1-6.0 .4300

    7 Remington 9 1/2 LR 4.75 3.7-6.25 .5679

    8 Fed Match GM210M 4.64 4.0-5.6 .3296

    9 Federal 210 LR 4.62 3.7-5.5 .3997

    10 CCI BR2 4.37 4.0-5.0 .2460

    11 CCI 200 LR 4.28 3.8-4.8 .3218

    12 KVB 7 LR Russian 4.27 3.8-4.8 .2213

    13 Rem 91/2 (30 yrs old) 4.16 3.8-4.8 .3427

    Pistol primers

    14 Rem LP 4.47 3.2-5.6 .5171

    15 KVB 45 LP Russian 3.89 3.3-4.2 .2232

    16 CCI 300 LP 3.18 2.7-3.5 .2406

    17 Federal 150 LP 3.11 2.6-3.5 .2090

    18 Fed Match GM150M 3.05 2.6-3.7 .2299
    Charter Member #148

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master


    swheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    5,471
    I still think the higher brissance of the Rem 9.5 primer is moving the bullet forward at ignition. "Most of the tests were of 100 or more primers." I would think this should be a very good indicator of brisance of the various brands, looking at deviation I understand why I don't use Remington primers, like a box of choclates!
    Charter Member #148

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check