Snyders JerkyReloading EverythingRepackboxWideners
MidSouth Shooters SupplyRotoMetals2Titan ReloadingLee Precision
Inline Fabrication Load Data
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 53

Thread: Ruger quality has gone down the drain...check out their cobble job

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532

    Ruger quality has gone down the drain...check out their cobble job

    If you check out my previous post on the American 450 bushmaster on missing bluing and scratched you will see I sent the new rifle back to Ruger to have it reblued. They ended up replacing the barrel instead of bluing it and I would assume the lugs didn't match up so their repair shop must have cobbled it as it wasn't like this when I sent it in. What a joke. It looks like some kid took a dremmel tool and sloppily ground it three places around the lugs to make the bolt close.

    Dose anyone else's Ruger American have grind marks on their bolt from factory?

    Last Ruger rifle I'll own. Their workmanship and quality has gone down the drain.

    Attachment 196328Attachment 196329Attachment 196330Attachment 196331

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy


    thegatman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York State of Confusion
    Posts
    360
    Old Rugers are the best. New ones are cheaping out. Would not buy a new Ruger.

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    I googled some pics of them and there are notches on the bolt in these spots from factory but they went to town on it with a dremmel. I'll probably get out my file, 1500 grit sand paper, and some mothers polish and fix it myself. By the time I send it back a second time they'll probably screw something else up.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master

    lefty o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,187
    it is really too bad, but their quality has been on a pretty good downward slide for about 10yrs now.i honestly dont think ill ever buy another new ruger.

  5. #5
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    Well it took me about an hour of filing, then 200,220, and 1500 grit sandpaper and then mothers polish. I didn't pull out the dremmel and buff it to a shine but it looks 99 percent better. It cycles smoother now...of course.

    Attachment 196343Attachment 196344Attachment 196345

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    I guess that's what happens when you try to sell a million guns...quality goes in the toilet.

  7. #7
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    That is a bottom of the line econo gun.
    What level of fit and finish can Ruger afford on their cheapest models???
    People are buying Ruger Americans and Savage Axis guns to save money.
    The Hawkeyes I have seen look like they have a high level of fit and finish.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master

    lefty o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,187
    it sure shouldnt look like those first pictures, even if its the cheapest thing they sell.

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    Quote Originally Posted by jmort View Post
    That is a bottom of the line econo gun.
    What level of fit and finish can Ruger afford on their cheapest models???
    People are buying Ruger Americans and Savage Axis guns to save money.
    The Hawkeyes I have seen look like they have a high level of fit and finish.
    It doesn't give them a right to Half a$$ the repair job because it's their entry level rifle.
    I bought it because it's the only factory bolt gun available chambered in 450 bushmaster. I paid $500 for it. I have better quality firearms I've paid a lot less for. They now have a scout version that I would have grabbed up if I knew was available before I pulled the trigger on this one. I have couple Hawkeyes, a 77/44, Ruger carbine, vaquero, and couple p89s. Seems like all the newer Rugers have been cheapened no matter what which model it is. Sad,because I really love my older ones.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 05-27-2017 at 12:09 AM.

  10. #10
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    I have a lot of Ruger handguns. I think the 450 Bushmaster is a great round and kudos to Ruger for putting that gun out there. I have no problem with the quality of the Ruger handguns I have. New and old. I have four P89 DCs and love those guns. I have four LC9s Pros and they all are as reliable as a gun gets. Have a bunch of LCRs and love those as well. Just got a couple LCP II s and never, ever thought I would own, let alone love a .380 ACP anything. Got some Underwood 380 ACP ammo for street use and now getting set up for casting and reloading those pop guns. 250 ft lbs with a decent bullet is no joke, especially in a tiny gun. Only Ruger Long Gun I have ever owned is a 10/22. Doubt that will change.

  11. #11
    Perma-Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Tripplebeards View Post
    It doesn't give them a right to Half a$$ the repair job because it's their entry level rifle.
    I FULLY AGREE!! I own one Ruger Revolver, a GP-100 Talo exclusive, i went with the Talo version in hopes their Quality Control would be better, i am sure glad i did! This GP-100 is really nice. I have seen MANY MANY of their standard GPs, Blackhawks, Redhawks, etc. At gun shops that i would not have settled for, piss poor fit n finish, just plain rough. The old Rugers are absolutely beautiful guns, high lustre finish, very nice fit n finish. I would GLADLY pay more for a gun like they USE to make years ago! But now days I avoid Ruger. Several years ago I bought 4 brand new Ruger Revolvers the same day, 3 of them had to be returned for repairs, A GP-100 (they replaced the barrel) A Blackhawk .30 Carbine (Wrong ejector installed from the factory) the distibutor i went through checked his inventory of the .30 Carbines after my issue and had to send a PILE of them back (30-40 of them iirc?) all had the wrong ejector. And last a SBH .44 Magnum, everytime i fired it the base pin would jump forward and obviously the Cylinder would bind up, the cut was off at the cross latch, Ruger had to recut and fit it. The only keeper was single six .22-.22 Mag convertible. These were all brand new in the box guns that i had special ordered through an FFL

  12. #12
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    Quote Originally Posted by 54bore View Post
    I FULLY AGREE!! I own one Ruger Revolver, a GP-100 Talo exclusive, i went with the Talo version in hopes their Quality Control would be better, i am sure glad i did! This GP-100 is really nice. I have seen MANY MANY of their standard GPs, Blackhawks, Redhawks, etc. At gun shops that i would not have settled for, piss poor fit n finish, just plain rough. The old Rugers are absolutely beautiful guns, high lustre finish, very nice fit n finish. I would GLADLY pay more for a gun like they USE to make years ago! But now days I avoid Ruger. Several years ago I bought 4 brand new Ruger Revolvers the same day, 3 of them had to be returned for repairs, A GP-100 (they replaced the barrel) A Blackhawk .30 Carbine (Wrong ejector installed from the factory) the distibutor i went through checked his inventory of the .30 Carbines after my issue and had to send a PILE of them back (30-40 of them iirc?) all had the wrong ejector. And last a SBH .44 Magnum, everytime i fired it the base pin would jump forward and obviously the Cylinder would bind up, the cut was off at the cross latch, Ruger had to recut and fit it. The only keeper was single six .22-.22 Mag convertible. These were all brand new in the box guns that i had special ordered through an FFL

    My dad bought a New RedHawk last year that the cylinder blinded. I ground when the cylinder rotated and cylinder wouldn't line up with the barrel. If He would have fired it, it would have blown up in his hand. He took it back and traded it for a new vaquero. The vaqueros finish wasn't finished by the front sight and handle didn't fit correct and was hanging off one side on the vaquero. He accepted it in trade. I will get a talo next time around. I will have to get around to polishing it for him and replacing the grips.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 05-27-2017 at 07:18 AM.

  13. #13
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,402
    That's shoddy work on Rugers part. Looks like you cleaned it up but my gosh- you shouldn't have to. Well I hope it redeems itself in the shooting dept!
    Best, Thomas.

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    Attachment 196350Attachment 196351Attachment 196352

    Here are some better photos after I worked on it. Not perfect but a lot cleaner look. I might get out the dremmel a polish it along with the bolt to get rid of bolt friction noise when cycling as well. I figured I'd do it myself instead of having to send it back and forth a second time. But Bluing I can't do.
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 05-27-2017 at 08:06 AM.

  15. #15
    Boolit Buddy ikarus1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by jmort View Post
    That is a bottom of the line econo gun.
    What level of fit and finish can Ruger afford on their cheapest models???
    People are buying Ruger Americans and Savage Axis guns to save money.
    The Hawkeyes I have seen look like they have a high level of fit and finish.
    Right here is the truth. $399 gun gets high volume low effort. However when you sent it back that shouldve been addressed.

  16. #16
    Boolit Master Jedman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Lenawee County , MI
    Posts
    1,330
    That's a lot of grinding ! It should not have taken that much to make it work right.
    Ruger makes most of its parts like the bolts from investment castings and should be made to fit without any additional grinding.
    That would be unexceptable to me but I don't know what you could do to get them to replace the bolt or give you a new rifle that's not cobbled up ?
    I too once thought Rugers were great guns but have changed my mind over the past 20 years as I know of plenty of new Rugers that don't shoot worth a darn and you can waste a fortune in trying to get them to like something that will group well.
    Sorry for your loss.

    Jedman

  17. #17
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    So I figured I'd continue on project now that I'm home from work. I felt the trigger grind when testing it. The trigger release has deep scratches in it causing it to bind when pulled.
    It catches on the inside of the trigger and makes a grinding noise when pulling it. If ruger doesn't send me one ill guess I just have to sand and polish it too. It just keeps getting better.

    Attachment 196385

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,532
    Well I filed,sanded,and polished the trigger release and since I had the trigger out( and I felt a little creep besides the grinding) I polished it as well.

    Attachment 196409Attachment 196419

    So I then reassembled it and the release was still grinding against the side of the trigger. The pin that holds it in place is way too small in diameter. I remembered using one of my punches as a pin to take the slop out of my 77/44's trigger a few months back. I grabbed my punch set and found the correct diameter that fit tight. I cut it off and reassembled again.

    Attachment 196420Attachment 196421

    Much better but as you can see there is too much slop between the release and the inside of the trigger housing giving it room to wiggle back and forth when squeezing it. It is still is rubbing against the inside trigger housing just not as much. I know there is a guy who sells bolt shims for the 77/44 and also sells smaller ones that would work in this. You can see the gap I'm referring to that is causing it to shift side to side...

    Attachment 196422

    Well, I have no shims so I put it back together and once aligned in the gun I was pulling the trigger straight back...the grinding and rubbing gone and the trigger is awesome! It is crisp as crisp can get. I don't have a scale but it's at or under 3lbs. I slammed the bolt a dozen times as hard as I could to make sure it would not slam fire. Problem solved and I can live with a shiny trigger release.

    Attachment 196423
    Last edited by Tripplebeards; 05-27-2017 at 11:11 PM.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SE Iowa
    Posts
    679
    Ruger and quality can not be used in the same quote

  20. #20
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Blanket View Post
    "Ruger and quality can not be used in the same quote"
    Are you sure about that???

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check