Inline FabricationMidSouth Shooters SupplyLoad DataRepackbox
WidenersRotoMetals2Titan ReloadingReloading Everything
Lee Precision Snyders Jerky
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: Arisaka acquisition

  1. #1
    Boolit Master



    NavyVet1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    409 area code -- Texas, ya'll
    Posts
    3,775

    Arisaka acquisition

    I acquired an Arisaka Type 99 (7.7x58) about 5 months ago that had been "sporterized". It wasn't exactly Bubba-ized, but I've definitely seen better jobs at sporterizing one. Still, it only cost $100 and the bore looked good and the wood looked good while still having a bit of character to it.

    The firing pin would not fire, but disassembling the bolt and a bit of cleaning fixed that. The original front and rear sights are missing and the barrel was apparently cut and recrowned to remove the front sight. The new front sight is shorter than the original, so replacing the original rear sight would not help.

    Also need to replace the buttplate. It is just not the right size -- a bit too long in one dimension and too short in another. Since it's not a cutdown version of the original Arisaka stock, I can't just use find an original steel buttplate and install it on there. That's a minor issue though.

    Just finally got the dies for it and the case trimming guide for converting .30-06 brass to 7.7x58 about a week ago. My first load was 5.2 gr of Red Dot to test it out with since that was what my powder measure was already setup to drop for .45 ACP loads and I figured it would be a good test since I was shooting it in my garage. I recently loaned my chrony to my nephew, so I have no idea what the velocity might be, but it fired and didn't blow up in my face, so I'm happy.

    Since I only ended up paying $100 for the rifle, I don't want to put too much into it. Someone along the way tapped the gas escape hole forward of the bolt opening for a scope along with adding another hole at the rear of the bolt opening to apparently mount a scope on it at some point. Of course, they are different sized screw holes. There are also two screw holes on the right side of the rear of the receiver, so I'm thinking that it might have at one point in its life had a side mounted aperture sight put on it.

    I took the rifle to a gunsmith to see what he might have for a mount, but he could not determine the size of the existing screw threads. He also said that they don't keep much in stock anymore since most people that come in have ARs or something that need work on and not that many people that they deal with have bolt action rifles. Apparently, the old machinist type gunsmith is not that common anymore.

    I tried making a rear sight drilling an aperture hole in a small pieces of lead that would screw into the hole to see if the eye distance was close enough to place a sight there. As a proof of concept, it worked, so I figured that I just needed to find the right screw size(s) for the screw(s) and work from there. As I was looking for something else in my reloading room last night, I stumbled across a slotted hex head machine screw that seemed to have a pretty fine thread on it, so just for curiosity's sake, I tried it out. Surprisingly, it worked in the screw hole that had been tapped into the vent hole. I think that the machine screw was from a computer motherboard or hard drive mount or something. I took the screw up to Sears Hardware to see if I could find a nut for it to see what size it was. Turned out that it was a #10-32. That got my hopes up since I figured that Bubba-smith had just used whatever standard screw thread taps that he had handy. So, I then bought 4 sets of machine screws and nuts -- #10-32, #8-32, #6-32, and #4-40 to take back to house to give it a try. I got the nuts so that in a pinch I could use them as a lock nut on the screw and use the slot in the screw as the rear sight for testing. I bought brass screws and nuts so that in a pinch, if it wasn't the exact correct thread, the steel of the receiver could cut the new threads in the brass machine screws.

    Well, I lucked out pretty good. The #8-32 perfectly fit the hole on the rear of the receiver aft of the chamber opening. The #6-32 appeared to be the right diameter for the two side holes, but the wrong pitch. I suspect that with the soft brass, I could force it and make new threads on the machine screw if needed. The #4-40 was definitely too small for the threaded holes. So, I'm thinking a #6-40 might be a good candidate for those holes. So, back to Sears Hardware or Ace Hardware today to see if I can find that size.

    The mold I'm using for this is the Lee C312-155-2R. It's the same mold that I use for the .300AAC -- the only difference is that I will not be resizing the bullets. For testing, I'm just hand dipping the bullets in molten pan lube wax and setting them aside to cool. I'll work my way up to around 13gr of Red Dot to see how it works for plinking before considering full power loads. I also have a Lee C309-113-F that I might try unsized to see if it will work. I had originally bought it for the an AR in .300AAC, but the bullets would not feed (probably just too short and not pointy enough).
    Last edited by NavyVet1959; 01-06-2016 at 02:44 AM.

  2. #2
    Moderator


    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Way up in the Cascades
    Posts
    8,186
    You mentioned 6-40 as being a good possibility. 6-48 is a very common size thread used by gunsmiths in mounting scopes. Sounds like you've already derived $100 worth of fun from your investment. I'd enjoy seeing some photos, including the holes.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master



    NavyVet1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    409 area code -- Texas, ya'll
    Posts
    3,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Gebirgsjager View Post
    You mentioned 6-40 as being a good possibility. 6-48 is a very common size thread used by gunsmiths in mounting scopes. Sounds like you've already derived $100 worth of fun from your investment. I'd enjoy seeing some photos, including the holes.
    Which probably means that it is NOT 6-48... I don't think Bubba-smith would have had gunsmith tap and dies.

    Besides, if it had been a normal gunsmith thread, the gunsmith I took it to would have probably had the right size machine screw. He thought it might be metric, but I'm thinking that it was more likely a non-firearm thread.

    At worst, it's cost me $0.25 to try out a #6-40.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    533
    Japs rifles are very strong action but bore size can run from 310 to 317 a lot of chamber are a bit oversize that were the problem is using 30-06 cases to fit the japs chamber but that only for high pressure rounds. Cast bullets are good low pressure round to use. I never seen a bad jap barrel because all the ones i seen were chrome line bores. The later war Jap rifles are very crudely made so be carefull on their use The ones from 1939 till about 1943 are the good ones

  5. #5
    Boolit Master



    NavyVet1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    409 area code -- Texas, ya'll
    Posts
    3,775
    Quote Originally Posted by bouncer50 View Post
    Japs rifles are very strong action but bore size can run from 310 to 317 a lot of chamber are a bit oversize that were the problem is using 30-06 cases to fit the japs chamber but that only for high pressure rounds. Cast bullets are good low pressure round to use. I never seen a bad jap barrel because all the ones i seen were chrome line bores. The later war Jap rifles are very crudely made so be carefull on their use The ones from 1939 till about 1943 are the good ones
    It's a series 22 from the Kokura plant, which would put it somewhere in the late 1942 or first half of 1943 timeframe. Since the serial number is 69xxx, I would say more likely in the first half of 1943.

  6. #6
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by bouncer50 View Post
    Japs rifles are very strong action but bore size can run from 310 to 317 a lot of chamber are a bit oversize that were the problem is using 30-06 cases to fit the japs chamber but that only for high pressure rounds. Cast bullets are good low pressure round to use. I never seen a bad jap barrel because all the ones i seen were chrome line bores. The later war Jap rifles are very crudely made so be carefull on their use The ones from 1939 till about 1943 are the good ones
    I've read that the later Jap rifles and especially the "last ditch" rifles were unsafe, BUT that is a myth. Yes they were crude in manufacture to expedite rifles faster, but the steel was same as the earlier rifles. As usual it's always wise to take things easy at first and also examine what you have very close..

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,035
    See if a Lyman 57smet sight fits?

  8. #8
    Boolit Master



    NavyVet1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    409 area code -- Texas, ya'll
    Posts
    3,775
    Well, my experiments today seem to indicate that those two side screws are probably a #6-40, but a tapered thread. The gunsmith said that he thought they might be tapered.

    I bought a picatinny rail for about $10 today at Academy. It was originally for a Thompson Encore / Contender, but I thought that I could make it work. I drilled a new hole at the far end of it to match up with the gas port that had been tapped and then enlarged the forward hole to fit a #10-32 and the rear hole to fit a #8-32. Tightened them up and they feel pretty secure. Probably can't use a stripper clip to load ammo in the mag anymore, but since I don't have a stripper clip, that's not a big deal. The rounds can be loaded one at a time and they eject without hitting anything, so it seems like it might work acceptably. Didn't have my allen wrench to move the scope mounts on my scope, so could not test out the scope on the rifle.

    If the plugged gas port hole is that big of a deal, I could try drilling a 1/16" hole down the center of the #10-32 screw. That might be a bit tricky though.

    Here's what it looks like so far:



    Full resolution:
    http://images.spambob.net/navy-vet-1959/arisaka-01.jpg
    Last edited by NavyVet1959; 08-18-2016 at 11:10 PM.

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    4,677
    That is not too bad for a $100.00 rifle.
    And you are right.
    There are few gunsmiths that are willing to make their own parts now for a customers rifle.
    If they cant order it, then it cant be fixed, is what they tell their Clients.
    I pick up a lot of guns, and mostly for Free that people said, " I have taken it to Five Gunsmiths, and they all tell me the same thing".
    "You cant find the parts, and it would cost more than the gun is worth to make or Fix the existing part".
    So , they just give me the gun.
    Most times I have it shooting in a week or less.
    I guess it might be related to Liability, and are afraid of someone filing a law suite against them if they make a part and someone gets hurt for any reason, even if it is not related to the work or part they made.

  10. #10
    Boolit Master



    NavyVet1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    409 area code -- Texas, ya'll
    Posts
    3,775
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGS View Post
    That is not too bad for a $100.00 rifle.
    And you are right.
    There are few gunsmiths that are willing to make their own parts now for a customers rifle.
    If they cant order it, then it cant be fixed, is what they tell their Clients.
    We've become a "throw away" society. Same with electronics. Used to be, you had electronics technicians who could troubleshoot things down the the component and just replace that. These days, the best you can hope for is for the technician to trace it down to the board that is bad and he'll replace the entire board. Or more likely, with many consumer electronics, if it quits working, you just throw it away and get a new one. Labor costs have just gotten so high and electronics so cheap that it doesn't make sense to pay someone to fix the item.

    I had figured that at worse, this rifle would just end up as a wall hanger. Surprisingly, I was able to get it shooting with very little effort. Now that I can put a scope on it, I might be surprised and it end up being worth shooting at distance. Now, considering how thick the brush around here is, "distance" might only mean 100 yards.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master Bad Ass Wallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,967
    I like the Arisaka. This is my sporter in 270 Savage

    Hold Still Varmint; while I plugs Yer!

  12. #12
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    533
    Quote Originally Posted by vzerone View Post
    I've read that the later Jap rifles and especially the "last ditch" rifles were unsafe, BUT that is a myth. Yes they were crude in manufacture to expedite rifles faster, but the steel was same as the earlier rifles. As usual it's always wise to take things easy at first and also examine what you have very close..
    If seen a quite a few last ditch jap rifles over the years. Back in the late 60s early 70s 10 bucks was a common price for them. If you ever see one in person i think you would not take a chance to fired one.

  13. #13
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    north of Houston, Tx
    Posts
    126
    I too agree, looks like a nice rifle for $100.

    Few years ago, a range member showed up to shoot a decent looking sporterized/scoped type 99 Arisaka for the first time that he too had paid a $100 for at some pawnshop. I happen to walk past his shooting bench when he was setting up and noticed the Arisaka and next to it was a box of 30-06 Remington ammo. I stopped to chat as I noticed the barrel on his rifles appeared to be the original military 7.7 barrel.....which it was. But stamped near the chamber was 30-06. So, as popular back in the day, it'd been rechambered to 30-06. Basically told him he had a .308 bullet going down a worn bore and that the 7.7 bore used a .311-313 bullet.....so, good luck with its accuracy. Guy would shoot the box of 30-06 and then find me on the firing line to show me his target, saying "I think this one is a keeper." After checking the zero on scope at 25 yds, he'd moved target back to 100 yds. LOL, his target had nothing but three shot cloverleafs on it.

  14. #14
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by bouncer50 View Post
    If seen a quite a few last ditch jap rifles over the years. Back in the late 60s early 70s 10 bucks was a common price for them. If you ever see one in person i think you would not take a chance to fired one.
    I am very familiar with the last ditch rifles. Yes they are crude in appearance. They aren't the only country to field a last ditch rifle. Have you ever seen a German 98 Mauser last ditch rifle? They aren't nearly as crude as an Arisaka.

  15. #15
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,481
    Quote Originally Posted by Huffmanite View Post
    I too agree, looks like a nice rifle for $100.

    Few years ago, a range member showed up to shoot a decent looking sporterized/scoped type 99 Arisaka for the first time that he too had paid a $100 for at some pawnshop. I happen to walk past his shooting bench when he was setting up and noticed the Arisaka and next to it was a box of 30-06 Remington ammo. I stopped to chat as I noticed the barrel on his rifles appeared to be the original military 7.7 barrel.....which it was. But stamped near the chamber was 30-06. So, as popular back in the day, it'd been rechambered to 30-06. Basically told him he had a .308 bullet going down a worn bore and that the 7.7 bore used a .311-313 bullet.....so, good luck with its accuracy. Guy would shoot the box of 30-06 and then find me on the firing line to show me his target, saying "I think this one is a keeper." After checking the zero on scope at 25 yds, he'd moved target back to 100 yds. LOL, his target had nothing but three shot cloverleafs on it.
    If you take in account the diameter of the bore (not the groove) you will find that the top portion of the lands do cut into and grip the bullets. J-words have the ability to center the bore much better then cast so undersized bullets can be surprising sometimes. Depending on the load (pressure) and type of J-word bullets, some of them do bump up and obturate to the bore/grooves. Of course in that gentleman's rifle the correct size bullets would have been better in accuracy and velocity considering no doubt that much gas went around his undersized bullets.

  16. #16
    Moderator


    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Way up in the Cascades
    Posts
    8,186
    Not getting into the "last ditch" argument, but I remember a gun shop in (I think...) El Sobrante, CA, back in the early 1980s that had two of the last of the last ditch rifles welded onto their double entrance doors for handles. You had to wrap your fingers around the barrel and pull to gain access. I purchased a 7.7 mm rifle in that store that someone had already sporterized. Still in the cut down original stock, but the bolt handle had been bent and the sights replaced. The clerk commented to me that he knew the former owner, "He's been shooting it and he's still alive!" I bought a nice stock from Bishop, but have never done a thing with it including shoot it. The firing pins for these seem to come and go in availability, and I kind of got bamboozled on the one in this rifle when a guy from Idaho visiting his parents in Oregon called up my shop and asked if I had one, claiming that he had been shooting his 7.7 and the firing pin broke. "Sure, come on over." I replaced the part and he went outside and test fired it (last ditch, and he also survived) and went away happy. I wasn't too happy when I attempted to replace the one I had sold and found out they were about as scarce as lips on chickens. Eventually, several years later, somebody made some more and I got it working again, but never have fired it. You can bet that I bought a second one and put it in the parts drawer. Meanwhile, I added two as-issued specimens to my collection, one pretty ordinary, but the other has little brass plates with Japanese characters on each side of the butt. The plates are different sizes and shaped differently but appear to say the same thing. I've never gotten a satisfactory translation for them. It has a wooden butt plate, but is otherwise not very last ditch, although perhaps not as well finished as the early models. Anyone here read Japanese? Oh yeah--you gotta watch out for those Idaho guys.....

  17. #17
    Boolit Master



    NavyVet1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    409 area code -- Texas, ya'll
    Posts
    3,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Gebirgsjager View Post
    Meanwhile, I added two as-issued specimens to my collection, one pretty ordinary, but the other has little brass plates with Japanese characters on each side of the butt. The plates are different sizes and shaped differently but appear to say the same thing. I've never gotten a satisfactory translation for them. It has a wooden butt plate, but is otherwise not very last ditch, although perhaps not as well finished as the early models. Anyone here read Japanese?
    Post a photo of the characters in this thread. I might have someone who can help...

  18. #18
    Moderator


    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Way up in the Cascades
    Posts
    8,186
    Thanks! I shall get it out and take some photos.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    6,213
    I think it was Thailand that had the captured Jap rifles rechambered to 30-06. We were supporting them with ammo and other things after WWII.
    I have 3 Type 99s and 1 Type 38. I use 8X57 in the Type 99s as one pass thru the full length sizing die and it is ready to load. The shoulder is farther forward on 8 X 57 versus 7 X 57.

  20. #20
    Moderator


    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Way up in the Cascades
    Posts
    8,186
    Attachment 157247Attachment 157248Attachment 157250Attachment 157251Attachment 157252Attachment 157253

    Here it is. About all I think I know about it is that it was apparently made at the Kokura Arsenal. I believe it you click on the photos they will enlarge, and perhaps your friend can read the plates. Thanks.

    Leadman--I don't know about Thailand, but the South Koreans used them in the beginning of the Korean War until rearmed with U.S. weapons.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check