WidenersLoad DataReloading EverythingTitan Reloading
RotoMetals2Inline FabricationLee PrecisionPBcastco
Repackbox MidSouth Shooters Supply
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Simmons 20x-60x On Sale For $49 at Cabela's Is No Bargain

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master

    jonp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    8,281

    Simmons 20x-60x On Sale For $49 at Cabela's Is No Bargain

    I saw the ad and wanted a cheap spotting scope for occasional use and to leave at my hunting camp to look at moose at the end of my pond so headed to Cabelas to pick one up. On sale for $59 (1/2 off) with a $10 Mail In Rebate and $25 on a gift card and the scope was about $25.

    Got it home, took it out of the foam lined hard case and tried to unscrew the lens protector. The entire lens moved in a circle and I was able to pull it out with little effort. Of course, this makes it impossible to use the magnification ring. Buy cheap, get cheap. Guess I'm doing another 1hr trip back to Cabela's in the morning.
    I Am Descended From Men Who Would Not Be Ruled

    It is not with strength one will prevail; those who oppose The Lord will be broken

  2. #2
    Boolit Master RKJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,119
    I got one of those at WM a few years back after my old one bit the dust and I remember why I don't like Simmons Optics. It's not even usable at 25 yards for me. You're right, you get what you pay for.

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by RKJ View Post
    I got one of those at WM a few years back after my old one bit the dust and I remember why I don't like Simmons Optics. It's not even usable at 25 yards for me. You're right, you get what you pay for.
    I bought one at Wally World a few months ago and it has been very good. It is clear enough to see 22 caliber holes at 200 yards no problem. It has even survived a couple of 3 foot falls onto concrete with no ill effects.
    Maybe I just got lucky.

  4. #4
    Perma-Banned



    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,712
    I bought one a few year ago, been very pleased with it. Resolution is good enough for .223 at 200yds on any target and with the right target you can see them at 300yds.
    Last edited by shoot-n-lead; 04-01-2017 at 10:43 PM.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master RKJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,119
    Maybe it's my eyes but I can't make out 22 holes at 25 yards with mine. I'll take it back out here soon and try it again, maybe I'll be surprised. (Hopefully)

  6. #6
    Boolit Master




    Scharfschuetze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    3,349

    Inexpensive Spotting Scope

    I use an inexpensive scope when shooting bullseye pistol at 25 and 50 yards, but for rifle shooting at long range it is useless. In the end, you get what you pay for. Emptor caveat comes to mind.

    One of my best spotting scopes is an old Bausch and Lomb 20x that I bought for something like $50 from an old target shooter disposing of his equipment at a gun show. Keep your eye out for something like that.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Scope B&L 20X.jpg  
    Last edited by Scharfschuetze; 04-04-2017 at 07:53 PM.
    Keep your powder dry,

    Scharf

  7. #7
    Boolit Master brassrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    conn.
    Posts
    979
    I bought a 60X, yrs ago, for 60$. Not very sharp and never use it only a $100 Tasco that ain't great either

  8. #8
    Boolit Master




    Scharfschuetze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    3,349
    You bring up a good point Brassrat.

    Scope power v. resolution is a problem that cheap spotting scopes or higher power inexpensive telescope sights have. Resolution, the ability to define details sharply, is a function of lens quality, yet many inexpensive scopes at high power just don't have the quality lenses or lens coatings to handle their power, particularly the variables on the higher settings. The higher the power, the better lenses you need.

    Manufacturers of inexpensive scopes often advertise high magnification to sell a product, but the quality just isn't there to use it. In the end, very, very, very few spotting scopes can use a full 60 power with any degree of good resolution and those that can, are usually well over a thousand dollars and outside the the OPs goal of an inexpensive scope.
    Last edited by Scharfschuetze; 04-05-2017 at 01:26 PM.
    Keep your powder dry,

    Scharf

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    I can buy a good long range rifle(Remington Long Range, Savage 10FCP-SR) and scope that lets me shoot to the limits of my ability for the same or less money than one of those high priced spotting scopes. I can get a good rifle scope in fairly high magnification (Weaver T36 $470 at Midway) for a lot less than the high priced spotting scope.
    Seems to me investing in a $1200 spotting scope is counter productive. The money could be better spent elsewhere.

  10. #10
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,612
    I guess I will disagree.
    Buy the best rest and spotter you can possible afford because they go to the range with every rifle. You can buy a Weaver T36 but you can't mount it on every rifle the same day at the range.
    The best rest will accurize every rifle and every load you have. A good spotter will enable you to spot the bullet holes for every rifle. Both are your best friends at the range.

    Quote Originally Posted by tazman View Post
    I can buy a good long range rifle(Remington Long Range, Savage 10FCP-SR) and scope that lets me shoot to the limits of my ability for the same or less money than one of those high priced spotting scopes. I can get a good rifle scope in fairly high magnification (Weaver T36 $470 at Midway) for a lot less than the high priced spotting scope.
    Seems to me investing in a $1200 spotting scope is counter productive. The money could be better spent elsewhere.
    EDG

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by EDG View Post
    I guess I will disagree.
    Buy the best rest and spotter you can possible afford because they go to the range with every rifle. You can buy a Weaver T36 but you can't mount it on every rifle the same day at the range.
    The best rest will accurize every rifle and every load you have. A good spotter will enable you to spot the bullet holes for every rifle. Both are your best friends at the range.
    I can put a T36 on all three of my long range shooters for the same money as the high dollar spotter.
    I can see 22 caliber bullet holes at 200 yards with my cheap spotting scope. I have never seen a scope capable of seeing small bullet holes at 600 yards in the black or most anywhere else on the target no matter the cost. Some of the guys at my local range have some of those high dollar spotting scopes and they don't seem to work much if any better than mine.
    The part about the rest I can agree with.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master brassrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    conn.
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by Scharfschuetze View Post
    You bring up a good point Brassrat.

    Scope power v. resolution is a problem that cheap spotting scopes or higher power inexpensive telescope sights have. Resolution, the ability to define details sharply, is a function of lens quality, yet many inexpensive scopes at high power just don't have the quality lenses or lens coatings to handle their power, particularly the variables on the higher settings. The higher the power, the better lenses you need.

    Manufacturers of inexpensive scopes often advertise high magnification to sell a product, but the quality just isn't there to use it. In the end, very, very, very few spotting scopes can use a full 60 power with any degree of good resolution and those that can, are usually well over a thousand dollars and outside the the OPs goal of an inexpensive scope.
    Mine is a variable, I just wrote 60X cause I figure some might know the model. What you said is true. Ill just say, cheap optics suck, if the glass is poor. I did just buy, on clearance, $10 Bushnell binos and they are great.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master




    Scharfschuetze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    3,349

    Spotting Scopes

    Seems to me investing in a $1200 spotting scope is counter productive. The money could be better spent elsewhere.
    Taz,

    For you and many others shooting casually that is probably the correct solution. However, that just won't work for several of the shooting sports such as National Match, Palma, NRA long range as well as the now popular sniper matches and for long range varmint hunting. Neither will it work for those of us that still shoot with iron sights. In the military and police sniping communities, the spotter using his spotting scope is the primary part of the team for finding targets and determining the wind indicators. We aren't looking for bullet holes in the above pursuits, we are looking mainly at the atmosphere for the mirage and other wind indicators that will affect the bullet's flight. The shooter and his rifle are subservient to the calls of the spotter as he has the optics for the job. A good spotting scope is really an important part of the tool box for serious shooting and doesn't hurt the casual shooter either.

    By the way, I also use my two best spotting scopes for astronomical observations at night as well as bird watching in the day time. Excellent optics are a must for this and coated lenses are de rigueur at night.

    I posted this photo just recently in another thread on spotting scopes. It is a Leuopold 20X that is fog proofed and is small and very light for its capabilities. The folding Freeland bipod and 18" rod extensions will all fit nicely into a rucksack for deployments (now it's just hunting or the range) or work nicely from the off hand position down to the prone position in formal NM or Palma competition. It's something like 30 years old now and resolves as well as ever. It's been around the world several times from the tropics to deserts. Here are two shots of the scope in use in NM competition.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Leopold 20X.jpg   Sats 07-800-70%.jpg   Sats 05-1200-90-cropped.jpg  
    Last edited by Scharfschuetze; 04-06-2017 at 03:09 AM.
    Keep your powder dry,

    Scharf

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    Scharfschuetze---- You present some good solid points. I would agree that in your situation, a really good spotting scope is a necessity for the reasons you describe. I admit that my spotting scope will not give enough resolution to see mirage clearly at long range.
    In my current situation and with what I do, it isn't needed for me. If I begin shooting the styles you mention, I expect I will need one as well. At my age I doubt I will ever be shooting competitively, or at least not on that level.

  15. #15
    In Remembrance

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,329
    Yeah, I bought a Nikon after a series of cheap ones failing to do what I wanted, and never looked back.
    ____________
    "...the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us. This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.” -N.Postman

  16. #16
    Boolit Master




    Scharfschuetze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    3,349
    I admit that my spotting scope will not give enough resolution to see mirage clearly at long range.
    Try this Taz:

    A nice trick to read mirage with a spotting scope is to adjust its focus to perhaps 50 yards in front of the target. This will allow you to see the light's refraction (mirage) in front of the target. It also allows a spotter or coach in the team matches to see the bullet's trace (supersonic disturbance of the air) accurately and know where the shooter is hitting in reference to his aiming point. For an experienced spotter, this trace is as good as a tracer bullet, but of course it is invisible to anyone but the spotter.

    As you all know, mirage is caused by ground warmed air rising through the colder air above the ground. This refracts the light photons into what look almost like waves of very clear water through the air. Up until about 12 knots or so, it gives a very useful indication of what the wind is doing between you and your target. After about 12 knots, it just lays down flat, but is still very noticeable. When I taught SOTIC Level II courses or advanced marksmanship in the Army, we spent many hours on teaching how to read it and compensate for it. Think of it as almost an invisible smoke between you and the Tango.
    Last edited by Scharfschuetze; 04-06-2017 at 12:59 PM.
    Keep your powder dry,

    Scharf

  17. #17
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,699
    That's interesting. I never thought to focus in front since I have always been trying to see the target. At closer ranges(200-300) I didn't think reading the mirage might be necessary.
    Obviously I have some things to learn and studying to do.

  18. #18
    Boolit Master




    Scharfschuetze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    3,349
    Taz,

    It's all good and that's why we enjoy shooting so much!

    a steady 10 knot full value wind at 300 yards with a 7.62 NATO round can deflect up to 2 to 3 MOA or about 6 to 9." Cast bullets are even worse!

    I was just at our annual shoot-a-thon over in Central Washington two weekends ago. On Saturday we had an almost perfect mirage to read of a generally steady 10 knot full value wind from 9:00 O'Clock. At 500 yards with my match AR15 and with a Yugo sniper rifle in 8mm Mauser I had a left windage adjustment of 4 MOAs or just over 1 mil. That's equal to roughly 20" of deflection, that's over half a yard or meter. By shooting between the higher gusts (wind gusts are usually cyclic) we were able to keep all shots into a pretty small area of a 36" square target. I spotted for several of the guys and was able to get them right into the target by watching both the mirage and the trace of their bullets.

    It's hard to have more fun than that with your clothing still on.
    Last edited by Scharfschuetze; 04-07-2017 at 11:50 AM.
    Keep your powder dry,

    Scharf

  19. #19
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    3,783
    Quote Originally Posted by tazman View Post
    That's interesting. I never thought to focus in front since I have always been trying to see the target. At closer ranges(200-300) I didn't think reading the mirage might be necessary.
    Obviously I have some things to learn and studying to do.
    Time to use a ML and Round balls at 2-300 yards. What you learn about wind and mirage will make you a better shooter with center fire rifles .

  20. #20
    Boolit Master


    David2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Baytown Texas
    Posts
    4,106
    I bought a cheap spotting scope once as well. It works at 100 yards for all size holes and .22 holes are visible at 200 as long as the power is kept down. At 300 only .260 and larger can be seen. It's useless for looking at the moon.

    I found a sale on a Celestron 80mm birding and astronomy scope with extra low dispersion glass a few years ago. It's a very sharp scope; able to resolve bolt holes on power pole hardware at 1/4 mile. It was still inexpensive compared to the name brand gun store spotting scopes at $350 and at deer camp I can show my friends and their kids some of the beauty of the night sky.

    David
    Sometimes life taps you on the shoulder and reminds you it's a one way street. Jim Morris

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check