Inline FabricationWisconsin TriggerGraf & SonsTitan Reloading
MidSouth Shooters SupplyLee PrecisionStainLess Steel MediaRotoMetals2

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Alloy for deer hunting

  1. #1
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    117

    Alloy for deer hunting

    44 mag, 265 grain with gas check - is 50/50 a good alloy for deer?

    45-70 - 330 grain HP, what recommendation do you have?

    Or am I over thinking this and is simply a case of if it's accurate and doesn't lead the barrel, you're good to go?

    Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Boolit Master

    Hickory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Great Black Swamp of Northwest Ohio
    Posts
    6,622
    Quote Originally Posted by Area Man View Post
    44 mag, 265 grain with gas check - is 50/50 a good alloy for deer?

    45-70 - 330 grain HP, what recommendation do you have?
    50/50 is about as good as you can get in the 44 mag for deer, I'd add a little tin for it to fill out and hold together when expanding.
    Last edited by Hickory; 03-20-2017 at 12:24 PM.
    Political correctness is a national suicide pact.

    I am a sovereign individual, accountable
    only to God and my own conscience.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ala.
    Posts
    376
    If that 44 boolit has a wide meplat, I wouldn't care whether it expanded or not. I would shoot the most accurate alloy (I hunt with COWW + tin for 44 and 45 colt). For the 45/70 hp, I have, I suspect, the same boolit and I shoot the same alloy and have killed several deer with it.I don't really know how much expansion I'm getting 'cause I've not recovered one but they work. Guess a softer alloy might open up more? I want to be sure of complete penetration tho.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    15,393
    I've used 50/50 (COWWs + 2% tin then mix 50/50 with lead) in both the 429244 (solid and HP'd) and the 429640HP in the 44 magnum in revolvers, a Contender and rifles from 1350 to 1675 fps. While the 50/50 does work well I've found a 16 - 1 (lead to tin) alloy is just as accurate and expands better with better weight retention. I have found the same in my 45/70 TDs with 300 gr GC'd RCBS bullets (solid and HP'd). I also cast my 50 cal Maxi-Balls now of 16 - 1 alloy for use at 1575 fps out of my TC Blk Mtn Magnum.

    Basically for velocities below 1600 fps now I use 16 - 1 alloy exclusively for hunting. However, for velocities above that (upwards of 2400 fps) I still use the 50/50 alloy for hunting.

    Larry Gibson

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Deary, Ideeeeeeho
    Posts
    2,268
    Area Man,

    I really believe that bullet shape is more important then alloy! That is, providing a reasonable alloy is being used to begin with.

    As T-Bird indicates the large meplat is going to do the work in the larger calibers.

    Now as to expansion ----------- Because there is NO controlling factor such as a jacket on a cast bullet it is and forever will be a factor of velocity and alloy at impact which dictates how much if any expansion will occur.

    An alloy that may expand wonderfully and classically at a given velocity at 50yds will likely have little to no expansion at 100yds. But should that same bullet/alloy be given enough velocity to give that classic expansion at 100yds, it is very likely going to over expand or disintegrate at the shorter distance.

    This is the reason that those bullets with large meplats, many times called bullets with a Wide Flat Nose are so greatly effective on game. No expansion needed. If it happens so be it, but there is no need to depend on it.

    So, forget Hollow Point bullets, as simply using a cast bullet with the large meplat/Wide Flat Nose is greatly more reliable and predictable!

    I wonder why the choice of a 330gr cast bullet for the 45/70, considering that typically bullets of 400+grains many times are a much better choice in this rifle. You don't need high for this cartridge velocity so why go with the light for caliber bullet?

    During my early days with the 45/70 and cast bullets I was working with the mind set brought about from years of shooting, loading for and hunting with typical high velocity jacketed/controlled expansion bullet cartridges.

    For that reason, I first chose a 355gr WFN bullet which I cast from an LBT (Lead Bullet Technology) mold and worked up/developed loads in the 2000fps + velocity range, testing as high as just over 2500fps. Hunting the first season at 2300fps. POOR CHOICE! In SPADES!

    The WFN bullet profile with a load that left the muzzle at 2300fps was overly destructive leaving a huge wound channel in a 100yd deer! NEVER WANT TO SEE THAT AGAIN!

    Thankfully that bullet gave me neither the accuracy or consistency I desired and my research lead me to a WFN cast bullet of 465gr which I put out the barrel at 1650fps. AWESOME on a growing pile of deer and 3 elk at this point.

    My alloy for the 465gr WFN, as recommended by the mold maker, is a 50/50 alloy made up of clip on wheel weights and lead. These bullets are water quenched as they fall from the hot mold.

    For my RUGER 77/44 carbine I am developing loads which I have tested in the 1600 - 1900fps range using bullets cast of just Wheel Weights. However this 275gr cast bullet is again of the Wide Flat Nose profile, this time from an Accurate Molds mold.

    As per recoil, the 355gr cast in the 45/70, fired at 2300 - 2500fps was MUCH worse then the 465gr at 1650fps.

    My 2016 elk was taken at 161yds with the WFN 465gr. and it as every critter taken with this rifle was a one shot kill.

    Good molds with proper casting will cast great bullets of just plain old WW, and the addition of tin is for the most part wasted money and won't make them kill any better.

    AS per the Lyman cast bullet manual, the nominal percentage of tin in WW is .5%. So, with my 465gr bullet being cast of a 50/50 - WW/lead - alloy they cast great even with the much lower percentage of tin, Plus they are ever so deadly on the deer and elk.

    Crusty Deary Ol'Coot

  6. #6
    Boolit Master pmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    East Central Minn.
    Posts
    1,327
    Air cooled 50/50 in the 45-70 works great on hogs too. I used a 405 grain with .325 meplat and it made a mess on both sides of the rib cage. The exit went between the ribs and made approximately a thumb sized hole and made me think the boolit held up good. This Russian boar was about 25 yards out and this is the entrance side, used 50.0 of IMR3031 in a Marlin. I really like this powder in the 45-70 because the recoil seems a lot easier too deal with than re7, 4198 and 2400.

    Water dropped WW would be better for bigger or more dangerous game I'd imagine.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20170314_175612.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	87.2 KB 
ID:	191278  
    Recent cast boolit hunts:
    prairie dog out west with a 1911 and a 200 grain LSWC
    4 pointer, 12 ga. rifled slug factory ammo
    doe, Accurate Molds 45-300G in a 50 cal. muzzle loader
    buck & doe, Accurate Molds 36-225AG Model 94AE

  7. #7
    Boolit Master

    DougGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    just above Raleigh North Carolina
    Posts
    4,978
    Air cooled 50/50+2% with soft lube over a gas check is as near perfect a deer hunting alloy as you could want for the 44 magnum. No HP needed, just wide meplat.
    Got a .22 .32 .357 .38 .40 .41 .44 .45 .480 or .500 S&W cylinder that needs throat reaming? 9mm, 10mm/40S&W, 45 ACP pistol barrel that won't "plunk" your handloads? Shoot me a PM! Also on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cylin...56429174391912

    Je suis Charlie

  8. #8
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    117
    Ok, I had already ordered a 265 grain WFN from NOE for my 44 mag. 50/50 with a bit of tins seems like the way to go for that one.

    For the 45-70 I had bought the hollow point mod because in my mind HP = hunting. I've got a Lee 90374 that's got a decent sized meplat. I'll go with 16-1 or 20-1 depending on accuracy.

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    West Kootenays, British Columbia
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusty Deary Ol'Coot View Post
    Area Man,

    I really believe that bullet shape is more important then alloy! That is, providing a reasonable alloy is being used to begin with.

    As T-Bird indicates the large meplat is going to do the work in the larger calibers.

    Now as to expansion ----------- Because there is NO controlling factor such as a jacket on a cast bullet it is and forever will be a factor of velocity and alloy at impact which dictates how much if any expansion will occur.

    An alloy that may expand wonderfully and classically at a given velocity at 50yds will likely have little to no expansion at 100yds. But should that same bullet/alloy be given enough velocity to give that classic expansion at 100yds, it is very likely going to over expand or disintegrate at the shorter distance.

    This is the reason that those bullets with large meplats, many times called bullets with a Wide Flat Nose are so greatly effective on game. No expansion needed. If it happens so be it, but there is no need to depend on it.

    So, forget Hollow Point bullets, as simply using a cast bullet with the large meplat/Wide Flat Nose is greatly more reliable and predictable!

    I wonder why the choice of a 330gr cast bullet for the 45/70, considering that typically bullets of 400+grains many times are a much better choice in this rifle. You don't need high for this cartridge velocity so why go with the light for caliber bullet?

    During my early days with the 45/70 and cast bullets I was working with the mind set brought about from years of shooting, loading for and hunting with typical high velocity jacketed/controlled expansion bullet cartridges.

    For that reason, I first chose a 355gr WFN bullet which I cast from an LBT (Lead Bullet Technology) mold and worked up/developed loads in the 2000fps + velocity range, testing as high as just over 2500fps. Hunting the first season at 2300fps. POOR CHOICE! In SPADES!

    The WFN bullet profile with a load that left the muzzle at 2300fps was overly destructive leaving a huge wound channel in a 100yd deer! NEVER WANT TO SEE THAT AGAIN!

    Thankfully that bullet gave me neither the accuracy or consistency I desired and my research lead me to a WFN cast bullet of 465gr which I put out the barrel at 1650fps. AWESOME on a growing pile of deer and 3 elk at this point.

    My alloy for the 465gr WFN, as recommended by the mold maker, is a 50/50 alloy made up of clip on wheel weights and lead. These bullets are water quenched as they fall from the hot mold.

    For my RUGER 77/44 carbine I am developing loads which I have tested in the 1600 - 1900fps range using bullets cast of just Wheel Weights. However this 275gr cast bullet is again of the Wide Flat Nose profile, this time from an Accurate Molds mold.

    As per recoil, the 355gr cast in the 45/70, fired at 2300 - 2500fps was MUCH worse then the 465gr at 1650fps.

    My 2016 elk was taken at 161yds with the WFN 465gr. and it as every critter taken with this rifle was a one shot kill.

    Good molds with proper casting will cast great bullets of just plain old WW, and the addition of tin is for the most part wasted money and won't make them kill any better.

    AS per the Lyman cast bullet manual, the nominal percentage of tin in WW is .5%. So, with my 465gr bullet being cast of a 50/50 - WW/lead - alloy they cast great even with the much lower percentage of tin, Plus they are ever so deadly on the deer and elk.

    Crusty Deary Ol'Coot
    Probably one of the best explanations I have ever read on bullet weights, meplats, and bullet performance. Thanks Crusty......can't wait to read more about the 77/44 loads. I managed to find one last year and will be casting for it this year.....a dual cavity mold from Accurate 280 and 300 grain wide flat nose's

    Is this the 465 grn boolit you are referring to?

    http://www.accuratemolds.com/bullet_...46-465BG-D.png
    Last edited by 35Whelen; 03-21-2017 at 11:09 AM.

  10. #10
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Southern VA
    Posts
    20
    Rarely does one say, YEA CRUSTY. Thanks CDOC!

  11. #11
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Deary, Ideeeeeeho
    Posts
    2,268
    35Whelen,

    While the Accurate mold you show is close, the mold I have is a 4 cavity mold made by Bruce (BABore) over on the Cast Boolits Forum when he was still making molds. Wish he still made his quality molds, but I have a number of molds from Accurate Molds in Utah and I think Tom makes an equally good product.

    I'll attach a before and after of my bullet. The "after" weighing 327.9gr was found after a quartering shot in a big cow elk. Never expected to find one of these! It took out the BIG/HEAVY upper front leg bone which is where I think it lost it's nose and still went about another 30" taking out a rib, through the lungs, a BIG heavy paunch, some guts and stopped just inside the hide in front of the off side ham.

    Second image is of my 2016 elk. side to side at 161yds.

    Crusty Deary Ol'Coot

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	005.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	22.9 KB 
ID:	191316Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN0732.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	136.3 KB 
ID:	191317
    Last edited by Crusty Deary Ol'Coot; 03-21-2017 at 12:31 PM.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Deary, Ideeeeeeho
    Posts
    2,268
    Area Man,

    Forget that H.P. It is simply not needed and not controllable in a cast bullet considering that range and impact velocities are variable.

    I did a lot of reading before starting down the cast bullet hunting road, and in truth it took a bit of faith to believe what I was reading about the results of a Wide Flat Nose cast bullet. The in field results have been nothing short of awesome on deer and elk and what I read was true in SPADES!

    After seeing what a 355gr WFN did on a 100yd deer with a muzzle velocity of 2300fps, there is no way in this world I'd want a H.P. bullet. Just how big do you want that wound channel?

    Crusty Deary Ol'Coot

  13. #13
    Boolit Master
    white eagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    from the land of sky blue waters
    Posts
    4,488
    Or am I over thinking this and is simply a case of if it's accurate and doesn't lead the barrel, you're good to go?


    pretty much sums it up
    for deer pretty much anything will work
    as long as you hit em where you need to
    Hit em'hard
    hit em'often

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check